hiyori said:
okay, first, his continuous advocating for a lynch. and look where that got us. i am being stubborn about this and maybe i shouldn't be influenced by town of Salem that much, but in TOS it's ALWAYS recommended to do a no lynch d1/d2, and random (although in our case it was more of a shaky/unsure/last minute/not totally agreed on/etc lynch) lynches are almost always called by 1. criminals or 2. mafia. the only reason I voted tardis instead of my no lynch vote was because curry encouraged it so strongly and I thought I should listen (Liam did too but honestly there's no way I'd follow what he said srry rofl) when in actuality I just did not know who to vote and I really shouldn't have voted without being more confident.
I did advocate for it very strongly and I would absolutely do it again. We've never no lynched in a game that I've played and look where no lynching got you guys last game. No lynch never gives you more info than a lynch does and when you have a larger game, you have more margin for error. I said Tardis wasn't a good enough vote and his lynch is not on my hands so don't blame me for this mislynch when people thought Tardis did something scummy when I wasn't convinced he was scum. Vote patterns are crucial information, and it's one of the things that made me suspicious of Alexi in AoT. So yes, I advocated lynching, but do not blame me for a lynch that I never said was a good idea and never voted for.
hiyori said:
then when he addresses me and asks me some questions (that I feel were unnecessary, mainly the one about how many games I played) about a few of my posts, it just doesn't seem like good reasoning to me and more of a "grabbing at straws" type of thing. another example of taking normal responses and twisting them into something different is when he said this (I'm struggling to quote on mobile so forgive me for just copying and pasting):
"-So? Because Nightmares sounds the same that immediately means she's town? I hate this whole idea people use of "I'm sounding like/not sounding like x game I was in, therefore I am y role." Both people who have used that excuse against me when I brought up a case against them turned out to be mafia. Alexi in AoT and Panda in Trump. They both told me I had no base and the point that they were sounding just like they played in x game where they were town. This is one of the biggest reasons I scum read people is when they use excuses like that."
- I strongly townread Nightmares
- Alexi and Panda SCUMread Curry (?)
- Both were based on the same reasoning (the same behavior in previous games)
- No correlation ???
* not to mention for some reason curry was saying you can't read anyone based on their behavior from past games. but then he goes on to remind me that we have played games together?
as for this quote though I will admit I don't understand if what I think he's saying is what he is saying since it doesn't really have much to do what I said so I'm just assuming this is the interpretation that made the most sense...i think I already said this though so if you could explain it differently that would help thanks.
I brought up the games because it's false information and I called you out on it. You'd played more than that and cancelled or not, that is mafia experience you have, which is important.
For your bullets:
-As you'll see below, you're biggest reason for town reading Nightmares sounds like you saying, "she doesn't sound like I did in Double Cop" with no examples from this game and calling them town for it. I don't like that mentality. "They sounded like/don't sound this, they/I am this."
-You're scum reading me.
-Not sure what this means.
-I have never said you can't read someone from their past games, I've said you can't just use meta as your only reason for reading someone as a town read or mafia read. Meta and information from past games can be extremely useful tools, but it shouldn't be the only factor in why you scum read or town read someone. See my point against Alexi in AoT:
ClamEatsCurry said:
Hence one of your favorite your defenses is "if people would look into my meta they would see that I'm following it and I'm always scum read each game!" Meta isn't the entirety of mafia and this game matters more than what people did in the past. Look at Cad, Jacob, entropy, and probably more who all said they wanted to change meta. Meta can be helpful at times, but when it's your strongest reason for sus'ing someone and your best defense, it doesn't hold weight.
You can absolutely use someone's past actions as reasoning for or against them. It can not be your entire case though. Notice how I didn't full town read Tardis, because I said the way he acted in the past proved townie but that wasn't enough for me to just call him townie. I did say I wish I had town read him so I could've defended against his lynch more since I thought it was a bad idea, but I never called him town because of the Tom thing. I said the last time he did something similar, he was town. With that being my only reasoning, I didn't put him down as town.
As for you, you've been in other games with me where info exists and I mentioned it. I've brought up stuff from this game though that I feel could be scummy. I'm not even full on convinced you're scum, but you are a candidate and I'll push you for answers just like I will for Liam and just like I will for Discord and Fleshy in the near future.
hiyori said:
and I didn't notice this in your post, but alexi and the other person were using that excuse to read you as /scum/ and not town (from my understanding). which is not what I'm doing. that sounds like twisting things to make me look scummy haha
They were, but my point was you were saying "I sounded like this in x game, and they don't, so they're town." which is a poor excuse to read someone as town. Just as a note, when I say this, I'm referring to this post by you:
hiyori said:
Well, I dunno, I'm not seeing her as scum. And this is coming from someone who had to observe what she said closely last game when I was mafia.
Last
hiyori said:
lastly, as I've mentioned many times before,
1. He calls me out for being wrong about him being scum in another game once
2. I call him out for misinterpreting my tone once in a game and again in this game
Why should his claim be anymore valid than mine?
and adding onto that, someone else also thought he was sus. but he only pressed me for my explanation. so :^)
It's different because you thought I was scum, I thought you were angry on a post. That's a huge difference. No one else said they'd elaborate, you did, so I asked you to elaborate. If someone else thinks I'm scum and wants to make a case, I'd love to hear it.