I actually kind of love this idea, especially for the people who miss having event restocks! Imagine the hype if a Star Wand popped up in the shopI think something could be done about the shop, since the tbt / event currency that goes into it just gets sent to the void. It would be cool if all items could be sold back and their stock would increase by that many, if that makes sense. That way there would still be plenty of common / low tier collectibles available for people to buy and we wouldn't have as much trouble getting rid of them. I'm not entirely sure how the collectible sellback values would be determined, though, especially since their current values are subjective...
I don't know how the TBT is generated on the backend or how the economy is maintained, but since we've had Bell Booms as part of a number of recent forum events, what if the amount we earn per post is increased permanently from its current state? Raise how much we earn per post and then future Bell Booms can be even boomier.
I don't have much to add to this discussion other than to echo these two points..I wouldn’t mind seeing the amount of tbt you earn for posting get a buff. Also just my personal opinion but I feel like too many areas of the forum don’t award bells for posting in (doesn’t help that these tend to be the areas/threads I post in most frequently, hahaha)
we might be thinking about two different situations but knowingly offering to buy a collectible for less than it's worth with the intent to flip it for profit is by definition bad faith trading. it's not like neopets or flight rising or somewhere with an anonymous mass-selling system where you put your item up for grabs to the void, on tbt you have to have a (virtual) face to face interaction with someone to buy their collectibles - you have to ask. to turn around and resell what you just bought for a profit is scalping and it's scummy.If users successfully managed to purchase a collectible and resell it for a higher price, then that’s just good business sense. Outwardly, it may appear to be an easy scam, but being able to interpret sales trends and monitor price fluctuations are skills in themselves.
Why don't we get Nookipedia involved?I have another idea. Have an Animal Crossing wiki attached to this site, which includes pages on Animal Crossing fansites. You can earn TBT Bells by making contributions to the wiki, with 100 TBT for new pages, 50 TBT for new media, 10 TBT for new edits, and 5 TBT for changed or removed edits. However, it will have to be submission-based, so people don’t abuse the system. Maybe early on, we could make it free to edit, but as the wiki develops further, it will have to be restricted. This isn’t the first time I thought of this idea.
Because they’re from a different system (Nintendo Independent Wiki Alliance). Notice that Serebii and ZeldaDungeon aren’t part of NIWA or Fandom, but they are popular wikis. Nookipedia is already part of NIWA, and Animal Crossing Wiki is part of Fandom. TBT’s Animal Crossing Wiki would have to be independent from both Fandom and NIWA.Why don't we get Nookipedia involved?
Oh, OK! I typed out my response to your idea on impulse so I didn't think about it for a moment.Because they’re from a different system (Nintendo Independent Wiki Alliance). Notice that Serebii and ZeldaDungeon aren’t part of NIWA or Fandom, but they are popular wikis. Nookipedia is already part of NIWA, and Animal Crossing Wiki is part of Fandom. TBT’s Animal Crossing Wiki would have to be independent from both Fandom and NIWA.
I don’t disagree here, but I do think it comes down to the person selling. Personally, I’ve never had to barter. On the rare occasion I actively try to sell something, I get what I’ve asked for…so I look at it as both the buyer and the seller leaving the transaction satisfied.we might be thinking about two different situations but knowingly offering to buy a collectible for less than it's worth with the intent to flip it for profit is by definition bad faith trading. it's not like neopets or flight rising or somewhere with an anonymous mass-selling system where you put your item up for grabs to the void, on tbt you have to have a (virtual) face to face interaction with someone to buy their collectibles - you have to ask. to turn around and resell what you just bought for a profit is scalping and it's scummy.
There are three wikis on Pokémon. One on Fandom, one NIWA wiki, and one as part of Serebii. I’m sure we can benefit with three wikis on Animal Crossing. Besides, Fandom is already dead, and Nookipedia has a couple errors (like it once said that Woolio is a lazy villager even though he is a jock villager) that makes Animal Crossing Wiki a more factual wiki.Oh, OK! I typed out my response to your idea on impulse so I didn't think about it for a moment.
For my two cents on this idea (), we already have two Animal Crossing wikis. I don't think we need another one if the sole purpose of its existence is to help people make more TBT. Also, I don't see any people here who are good at wiki editing, and those people are needed to maintain the wiki.
Although I don’t mind selling for less, it also has to be reasonable. The collectible usually asks for 4,000 to 6,000 TBT. 2,000 TBT may be low, but it’s still reasonable. But 400 TBT for a Planet Wand is still too low, even for someone who doesn’t rely on the tier lists like me. In fact, glow wands have rarely sold for less than 2,000 TBT ever since their introduction back in 2016.Apples, I offered you 400 for the planet wand. You could have made a sale. Why are you having trouble selling a collectible for a lower price?
Actually this wouldn't be a bad idea. Once upon a time TBT offered birthday bells- basically you got a couple hundred (maybe it was only 100?) TBT every year on your birthday. The admins could bring this back if they're too scared to implement a permanent bell boom. Or like someone mentioned, offer more TBT as rewards instead of collectibles during events since I think at this point there's more than enough pixel squares to go around anyways.I got it. TBT should send out stimulus checks.
They’d have to have a staff member sat going through every submission, reading it all, fact checking it all and confirming and denying it all. People sending CTS threads moaning their page didn’t get accepted. That sounds horrible tbhI have another idea. Have an Animal Crossing wiki attached to this site, which includes pages on Animal Crossing fansites. You can earn TBT Bells by making contributions to the wiki, with 100 TBT for new pages, 50 TBT for new media, 10 TBT for new edits, and 5 TBT for changed or removed edits. However, it will have to be submission-based, so people don’t abuse the system. Maybe early on, we could make it free to edit, but as the wiki develops further, it will have to be restricted. This isn’t the first time I thought of this idea.