Ask Zulehan stuff

Favorite TV show?
Although hard to choose just one, there are many I do not mind naming a favorite: Boy Meets World was excellent for being a years-long emotional roller coaster. I loved growing up with the cast, seeing the characters and their actors fuse into one so that you saw that when the characters were laughing, you know the cast was having so much fun, and when they were distressed, you know that when the cameras went off they did not just suddenly snap back to being happy as if nothing happened.

This belief was reinforced by the outtakes I saw, which showed the characters in more and more heartening and hilarious scenes, such as when Shawn and Angela made up and were sitting on a couch, only to discover Erik hid himself inside the cushions the whole time, and now, barely holding back his laughter while Angela looked at him in shock, told Shawn and Angela 'You need to get off me, man' (not scripted).

The show covered so much about what it means to be a productive person but also a good citizen and proud of and to love yourself, your family, your teachers, and everyone around you, without ever feeling overbearing. The writers knew how to cover 'heavy' topics without ever losing sight of their humor.

Oh, and it is about a boy 'discovering' 'the world' and all that entails: falling in love, going to school, becoming independent, being there for friends and family, going to the prom, getting in trouble for stupid things, feeling anxious over the idea that there is something intrinsically wrong with you and somehow finding the strength to overcome that, etc.

Yes, it viewed society through an upper-middle class lens, but as someone from a lower class background and currently living a lower-middle class lifestyle, I never felt that the show never considered the nuances, the trauma, and the heart of all walks of American life. Along those lines, Cory, the 'boy' who 'meets' 'the world' as the title implies, but who is part of an ensemble cast, had a best friend named Shawn, a 'trailer trash' kid (i.e., someone who grew up in a trailer park and was lower class, the label 'trailer trash' implying that you are full of 'bad' qualities and are a menace to society), but who was such a well-developed, heartening, and I would even say beautiful character, who plenty of times 'stole the scene' in some of the most heart-wrenching, heart-warming, and exciting moments of the show. Shawn was a good guy, if a troubled guy.

I identified with Shawn quite a bit, especially when that character questioned his ability to be in a meaningful relationship, and when confronting his wayward father. He may have been the character I most needed at the time.

Also: Is Pikachu cute because he is the mascot of the Pok?mon Company or is Pikachu the mascot of the Pok?mon Company because he is cute?
The way I see it? Both. He was made to be a 'title' character. Since the effort worked out, he officially became and remained the mascot. Of course, I am speaking as someone who has not actually read the history of Pok?mon, and who has a limited experience watching the show and playing the games.

Finally: Your opinion on Pikachu (assuming you have one)?
Mm, only in the most recent Pok?mon game. Do not much care for Pikachu. Bigger fan of Charmander, Golem, and Maractus, though I have never used them competitively (I am the kind of player who just enjoys single player and trades).

Thank you so much for the questions!
 
Last edited:
^ That was so interesting, because I never watched that show before. I'm not really into a lot of TV shows, so it's always nice to hear from one I only knew by name (took me some time to remember the French title though)!

Always nice to read from you, I really like your writing style and it is a lot different than what I usually read. So you're really welcome for the questions, because I enjoy reading the answers very much!
 
^ That was so interesting, because I never watched that show before. I'm not really into a lot of TV shows, so it's always nice to hear from one I only knew by name (took me some time to remember the French title though)!

Always nice to read from you, I really like your writing style and it is a lot different than what I usually read. So you're really welcome for the questions, because I enjoy reading the answers very much!
Just curious: what is the title in French?

Also, thank ye kindly; never thought of my writing as being notably different. As a writer, that is particularly encouraging, heh; I really do not want to be the guy who follows writing conventions to make a story that follows the rules but is otherwise meh.
 
Just curious: what is the title in French?

Also, thank ye kindly; never thought of my writing as being notably different. As a writer, that is particularly encouraging, heh; I really do not want to be the guy who follows writing conventions to make a story that follows the rules but is otherwise meh.

It's called 'Incorrigible Cory'... no need to translate x) 'Boy Meets World' sounds way better. I hate how we often translate titles in France so it may attract more people, we just put the main character's name with a random adjective... But I guess plain translation is sometimes a little boring.

Another example that comes to my mind is the movie 'The Purge' which in France is called 'American Nightmare' (more explicit, I guess). I like to compare original titles and their translations in several languages, it may sound very boring but I think that's quite interesting.

Oh and I didn't know you were a writer! Although I believe I saw you mentionning it in another post. I write a lot myself. Of course, my vocabulary is a lot more complex and rich in my native language, hehe (it would have been sad if it wasn't the case).
 
It's called 'Incorrigible Cory'... no need to translate x) 'Boy Meets World' sounds way better. I hate how we often translate titles in France so it may attract more people, we just put the main character's name with a random adjective... But I guess plain translation is sometimes a little boring.
I did a Google search for 'Boy Meets World French' and Incorrigible Cory was the first result, but since it needed no translation I thought, 'That cannot be right; I will just ask Delphine.'

In any case, interesting practice.

Oh and I didn't know you were a writer! Although I believe I saw you mentionning it in another post. I write a lot myself. Of course, my vocabulary is a lot more complex and rich in my native language, hehe (it would have been sad if it wasn't the case).
You already sound intellectual to me, but I bet in French you would sound overwhelmingly so.

Relatedly, my mom is a native Ilonggo speaker, and since I can still understand the language I see a big difference between her speech in English and Ilonggo: she is far more comfortable in the latter. And I get annoyed when, as she speaks in English to people here in the States, they sometimes look down at her as if she is a dead-end illiterate, rather than the driven spirit who outperformed nearly everyone in school, a college graduate who crawled out of insuperable poverty in the Third World to land in the middle class in a First World country.

Glad to see another writer who actually writes, heh. A lot of people tell me they are writers but say they have not written for months or years.

I am sad because my story, 'The Mapmakers,' wants to be a novel, but I was so caught up trying to make it into a short story for submission into a literary magazine. Three thousand character limit, the editor said, which led to me putting in too much exposition at the cost of narrative. Fortunately, now that I am done worrying about submission, I can flesh out the story, and put in a lot of the scenes I took out.
 
Last edited:
I did a Google search for 'Boy Meets World French' and Incorrigible Cory was the first result, but since it needed no translation I thought, 'That cannot be right; I will just ask Delphine.'

In any case, interesting practice.

Good way to know is to just open the Wikipedia page and then change the language (I do that very often).

You already sound intellectual to me, but I bet in French you would sound overwhelmingly so.

Many thanks :blush:

Relatedly, my mom is a native Ilonggo speaker, and since I can still understand the language I see a big difference between her speech in English and Ilonggo: she is far more comfortable in the latter. And I get annoyed when, as she speaks in English to people here in the States, they sometimes look down at her as if she is a dead-end illiterate, rather than the driven spirit who outperformed nearly everyone in school, a college graduate who crawled out of insuperable poverty in the Third World to land in the middle class in a First World country.

I wonder if intolerance and racism come from a lack of imagination. It is very hard for a lot of people to just put themselves in someone else's shoes, and try to imagine how others live and what they must have been through during their lifetime. I wish people knew that there is no need to try to make others feel ashamed for not speaking English as well as they speak their mother tongues. When someone settles in a new country and has trouble integrating in the society they arrived in, the native inhabitants often blame the new comer for not trying hard enough... But the older you are, the harder it is to learn a new language, or just to improve yourself with that language, and if you can't communicate it just makes everything harder...
I found your mother's story very inspiring, and it made me happy to read about such a strong woman's achievement (if I may say so).

Glad to see another writer who actually writes, heh. A lot of people tell me they are writers but say they have not written for months or years.

Didn't get the chance to write a lot this summer, but I did work a lot on my project (a scenario I have been working on for over two years). We had to take the car a lot this summer when we visited Scotland so I had plenty of time to dream about it. And if inspiration came out of nowhere, I always had something to write on with me.

I am sad because my story, 'The Mapmakers,' wants to be a novel, but I was so caught up trying to make it into a short story for submission into a literary magazine. Three thousand character limit, the editor said, which led to me putting in too much exposition at the cost of narrative. Fortunately, now that I am done worrying about submission, I can flesh out the story, and put in a lot of the scenes I took out.

Getting published is quite hard, I imagine. And a 'size limitation' must be very frustrating. Maybe it's for the best that you added back the scenes, and hopefully one day you'll find a good editor. Would be nice to read your novel, the title is very nice (I have been having a lot of trouble finding one for my own project, and just gave it a temporary title) and mysterious.

Ever thought about posting on a 'fiction site' (not sure what they're called)? Although I personally don't hang out on this kind of websites.
 
I would love for you to have heard of The Fray. A very talented band if you ask me. The Fray is a band that has lot's of meaning in their song's, unlike all those sexist rapper's who only care about sex.

(I said sex to much and now I feel like a pervert...)
 
Good way to know is to just open the Wikipedia page and then change the language (I do that very often).
Ah. Thanks for that.

I wonder if intolerance and racism come from a lack of imagination. It is very hard for a lot of people to just put themselves in someone else's shoes, and try to imagine how others live and what they must have been through during their lifetime. I wish people knew that there is no need to try to make others feel ashamed for not speaking English as well as they speak their mother tongues. When someone settles in a new country and has trouble integrating in the society they arrived in, the native inhabitants often blame the new comer for not trying hard enough... But the older you are, the harder it is to learn a new language, or just to improve yourself with that language, and if you can't communicate it just makes everything harder...
I found your mother's story very inspiring, and it made me happy to read about such a strong woman's achievement (if I may say so).
Yes, it is hard enough trying to imagine the situation from an outlook most unlike our own, as it is uncomfortable, especially as it requires much thought and reflection. I think what makes the exercise even harder is that racism, intolerance, and all forms of fallacies, hatreds, impatiences, etc., can easily be 'segmented' even in the most formidable minds.

For instance, you can be patient, good, considerate, and thoughtful toward certain people, then turn around and be impatient, bad, inconsiderate, and thoughtless to someone else, depending on whether you believe they are worth the time. In another way, someone can be a great thinker when it comes to physics, but when it comes to social policy she may seem the most callous person on earth.

And when it comes to language, it is especially hard to sympathize with people of other languages when that person has not given much thought to language. I think herein lies the true importance of having people become versed in another language: it is not merely that you can talk to people who speak that language, but that your perspective changes. In other words, learning another language affects the way you perceive issues because it is not only a communication tool but a machine for thinking, and that machine carries with it cultural baggage.

A lot of examples come to mind, one of which is Amy Tan's essay 'Mother Tongue,' which details how English encourages the communicator to get to the point, whereas Mandarin encourages a communicator to take her time. And when citing Tamil and English speaker Hari Shanker in my forum topic, 'Bilingualism, ideas, and the urge to write,' there was reiteration on the point that different languages affect how issues are viewed, and that those differences are not necessarily all 'better' but more complimentary. Especially when Shanker brings up the point about how 'Some languages are inherently superior in certain areas of human knowledge,' I am brought to mind of linguists Daniel Nettle and Suzanne Romaine's Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of the World's Languages, especially the part where it mentions (on page 70, hardcover edition)

A cover story for Time magazine entitled 'Lost Tribes, Lost Knowledge' in 1991 claimed that when native cultures disappear, so does a trove of scientific and medical wisdom. Despite the convincing case made for the loss of knowledge entailed by the loss of traditional cultures all over the world, the role of human languages as the main agents of cultural transmission was barely acknowledge.
If even the death of the languages of 'small' communities engenders a great loss for the sum total of human knowledge, then how about the languages of 'great' civilizations? If the baggage languages carry include a lot of 'first order' and 'second order' knowledge (i.e., practical knowledge, such as that mentioned in the quotation above, but also how such knowledge is interpreted, which carries additional value), then certainly there is value outside of a single language.

And so when an English speaker considers my mom inferior because she is 'only' a great Ilonggo speaker, perhaps he needs to rethink that way of assessing a person as possibly naive.

Glad my mom's story was inspiring, and thank you so much for the commentary.

And sorry for my rushed reply. I feel like the above deserves a lot of editing, considering the seriousness and breadth of the topic.

Didn't get the chance to write a lot this summer, but I did work a lot on my project (a scenario I have been working on for over two years). We had to take the car a lot this summer when we visited Scotland so I had plenty of time to dream about it. And if inspiration came out of nowhere, I always had something to write on with me.
Ooh, sounded like a good time. I would like to visit Scotland one day. And relatedly, my time on the plane on route to the Philippines tended to be occupied by book reading and poetry writing, heh. Indeed, a lot of what I said above was from what I recalled reading on my most recent plane ride.

Getting published is quite hard, I imagine. And a 'size limitation' must be very frustrating. Maybe it's for the best that you added back the scenes, and hopefully one day you'll find a good editor. Would be nice to read your novel, the title is very nice (I have been having a lot of trouble finding one for my own project, and just gave it a temporary title) and mysterious.
That would be quite an achievement, getting a novel done. I hope to do that one day. I find writing short stories quite rewarding, if more daunting, than poems. And I wish you well with your work, too. Maybe one day I will buy a novel that catches my eye from Amazon without realizing it is yours, assuming you do not already have a novel there.

Ever thought about posting on a 'fiction site' (not sure what they're called)? Although I personally don't hang out on this kind of websites.
Thought about it. I have registered to a few literature forums, but never stayed active on any. I was thinking of rejoining the writing club at school, but the recent requirement to read ten short stories and take notes made my lazy self say, 'nah.'

Thank you for the reply, as always!

I would love for you to have heard of The Fray. A very talented band if you ask me. The Fray is a band that has lot's of meaning in their song's, unlike all those sexist rapper's who only care about sex.

(I said sex to much and now I feel like a pervert...)
The Fray did not ring a bell until you mentioned them here and I looked them up on Google. When playing 'You Found Me' on YouTube, I immediately recognized the sound. Yeah, I like that song, and now that you reminded me of the band I will check out their other songs.

As for rappers, the ones you refer to seem not so much about sex as a definition of power that relates to their idea of machismo, which talks a lot about getting the girls, the cars, the money, etc., but never speaks of civic responsibility or responsibility to the community, or even taking responsibility for yourself. In regards to the latter sense of power, or empowering yourself and your community, there are plenty of rappers or hip-hop artists who speak on that, and they are the variety I listen to. Examples: Common, Talib Kweli, 2Pac, Immortal Technique, Mos Def, KRS-One.


Of course, rappers that avoid the misogyny and other forms of hatred do not have to be well-known as fixating on social issues, and they do not need to avoid love and sex entirely (after all, there is a way to talk about it without being hateful toward either gender or unrealistic about love relationships).

Thanks for the question!
 
Last edited:
@Zulehan: Reading what you write is always a blessing. Please never stop writing. Except if your fingers hurt too bad...
 
@Zulehan: Reading what you write is always a blessing. Please never stop writing. Except if your fingers hurt too bad...
Thank you. And thank you for being cool.

Yes, always a good idea to take a break at some point when writing, so that the hands do not fall off. Unless you are writing a true to life horror story.
 
Aw thank you :blush:

What are your thoughts on veganism, if you have any?
I had to look up the differences between vegetarianism to veganism. From what I read, seems the latter is a more 'purist' form of vegetarianism. As for me, though I do not practice either, I am not actively or at least consciously opposed to it. I do not have a well thought out philosophy regarding what it is appropriate to eat rather than the belief that we are naturally omnivores (though obviously what is natural is not necessarily ideal), can eat meat but should probably mostly eat vegetables, should avoid high sugar content, should make a social event out of eating and try to eat slowly and just enough to be satisfied.

Mm, actually, I have been influenced quite a bit by scholarly works about food, though much of it does not particularly have to do with vegetarianism or veganism. For instance, I have read books like Michael Pollan's The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals and Eric Schlosser's Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal, have watched films such as Jean-Paul Jaud's Food Beware: The French Organic Revolution, have read expos?s such as 'Big Sugar's Sweet Little Lies:
How the industry kept scientists from asking: Does sugar kill?
,' etc.

Relatedly, a recent article, Cat Li Stevenson's '3 Secrets to Mindful Eating' encouraged me to eat more slowly and to give more thought to portioning.

Also in regards to veganism, I know quite a few people think that anyone to adhere to such a viewpoint is necessarily an extremist, but one of those 'walking in other people's shoe' moments came to mind when scholar Norman Finkelstein made a point about how Mahatma Gandhi was a vegetarian, but never pushed that belief despite being a strong-willed individual. Here is the lesson Mr. Finkelstein took from that (emphasis mine):

Well, Gandhi was a man of action. That was what he said. Gandhi's view was that there are ten thousand things out there that everybody already knows are wrong and so then the sensible thing for politics is that if you want to have a practical impact on the world then you focus on subjects, matters and issues where people already agree are wrong and then get them to act on what they already agree with you on. I know and you know that virtually everybody from when they wake up in the morning they look around themselves and they say 'that's wrong, that's not right. That shouldn't be. That's unfair. That's unjust'. We are constantly making judgments of that sort. The problem as Gandhi put it is that we have vented an awful lot and done very little. And so he said the sensible thing if you are a political actor is not to try to raise consciousness but to try to get people to act on what they already know is wrong.

Now Gandhi was a very opinionated person and highly judgmental and had what by our standards would be very eccentric opinions. So you mentioned the vegetarianism, yes he was a vegetarian. He was also a Brahmachari, which meant absolute sexual abstinence. All through his writings he had an opinion on everything. He thought movies were a sin and he thought wearing underwear was sinful. He had opinions on everything. But Gandhi restricted the practice of his opinions on those subjects to himself and like-minded members of his cult, or what you would call an ashram. I would call it a cult but he called it an ashram and in the privacy of these ashrams he practiced these beliefs of vegetarianism, Brahmachari and so forth. Gandhi made no distinction between politics in the personal but he did make a distinction between what you'd call a personal ethic, which he practiced in an ashram, and politics as a broad mass movement.
I believe this is an interesting point for Mr. Finkelstein to make, since he has been the gadfly on Israeli politics, the subject he focuses on. But this reminds me of how a reformist like Martin Luther King Jr., who followed the examples of Mahatma Gandhi, believed that a great many were on his side, but only had to be roused into fighting for what they already believed deep down was right, no matter how much they tried to look the other way.

But let me stop there before I get even more off topic.

Thank you for the question!
 
Last edited:
I'm going to be 100% honest here: I'm so tired I don't get the subtleties of everything you wrote. I've read it twice and I think that the fact that's it's 3am right now isn't helping. I shall read it properly tomorrow, and try to give you a decent reply, after I got some rest!
 
I'm going to be 100% honest here: I'm so tired I don't get the subtleties of everything you wrote. I've read it twice and I think that the fact that's it's 3am right now isn't helping. I shall read it properly tomorrow, and try to give you a decent reply, after I got some rest!
Oh, my, that is late. Sleep well.
 
Your thoughts on collectibles, and how greedy the sellers can be? Why do you think they are so adictive?

And... if you were a cup of tea, what would your shape be?
 
Your thoughts on collectibles, and how greedy the sellers can be? Why do you think they are so addictive?
I find a few of them pleasing to look at, and I like showing them off. I do not care to sell for profit. I sold 10 light blue letter houses for 100 TBT each. (Interestingly, one member who bought a light blue letter house from me at that price then turned around and told another seller that he got the collectible for only 100 TBT, so certainly 100 TBT would be a fairer price, apparently either ignoring or intentionally overlooking the fact I was consciously selling well undervalue so that everyone got a chance to get that collectible, rather than only 'rich' members.) In the last few weeks, I gifted at least half a dozen collectibles valued at at least 1k, and I used several green letter house and easter egg collectibles to obtain the dark blue letter house and the party popper. The light green letter house, dark green letter house, classic easter egg, and Togepi easter egg was gifted to me, so it is only natural I would have a gifting attitude when it comes to collectibles.

In regards to the collectibles trade, I think there are an elite few who are purely business and more dedicated than I care to be. I believe some of the methods used for obtaining collectibles to be beyond my level of comfort, such as encouraging people to spend their TBT for 'entries' in a collectibles giveaway, or buying collectibles well under 'market value' to turn around and sell them well above. Even more, I know some people are fortunate enough to grab a notable percentage of collectibles during restock for the express purpose of squeezing as much profit as possible from them.

But I am not sure anything needs to be changed about the collectibles market, and I feel there is such uncertainty in the staff ranks of this forum, too. Along those lines, I think the controversy only helps to fuel the 'attractiveness' of the collectibles market, so that more and more people want to get involved, despite all the talk about how the collectibles market currently alienates too many people. If it alienated too many people, it would not be thriving and garnering many popular topics of discussion about it in the TBT Marketplace and Bell Tree HQ.

Moreover, though collectibles have sentimental value, even in this case they are a status symbol, even if just subconsciously: e.g., I was here for these events, and these collectibles signify it, make it so that everyone knows. As the TBT Marketplace grows in prominence as a 'feature' of this forum, so collectibles become the physical manifestation of 'accomplishment' in involvement in the TBT Marketplace. The only people the collectibles matter to in this context are other collectible-hungry people, and that is the point. An elite few show off to an elite few, and in this arms race they keep trying to one-up each other as being the elitist of the elite. Even in similar topics in forums like Brewster's Caf?, you might get a member saying collectibles do not really matter to me, by the way check out all these Pok?balls I have collected.

And some people love to collect for the sake of collecting, much as we collect furniture for our houses in New Leaf. We know it has no significance to our lives, but we will be damned if we let our virtual houses go unfurnished. The space below the avatar is like your personal space, similar to your signature space, and the collectibles are a means to furnish, to truly make it your own space.

Enough of my theories and ramblings.

And... if you were a cup of tea, what would your shape be?
I like drinking tea from a short, handle-less latte glass. And I know it is irrelevant, but since you mentioned tea: I like to brew tea that comes bag-less in cannisters, as most bagged brands dilute the flavor too much. I like tea enough that I even bought a tea maker from Adagio Teas. My favorite tea is probably rooibos vanilla and white peach.

As always, thank you for the questions!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top