[ Bit's Gallery ]

[Sab]

put the black brushing at a lower opacity. it makes the lighting too abrupt how u have it now. some sharpening and blurring could help ur tags a lot

 

[bittermeat]

Just a pretty simple one, I was bored. It's nothing spectacular or anything. It was pretty hard to render her though.

 

[kalinn]

i like this one
its so like clear? like its really high quality or something
lol idk how to explain it but i like it.
just kinda feels like its missing something tho.
8.5/10

 

[bittermeat]

i like this one
its so like clear? like its really high quality or something
lol idk how to explain it but i like it.
just kinda feels like its missing something tho.
8.5/10

Haha, thanks. I know, I don't know what to do about my signatures, they always turn out undone in my opinion. I need more ideas on little effects to add on.

 

[NikoKing]

i like this one
its so like clear? like its really high quality or something
lol idk how to explain it but i like it.
just kinda feels like its missing something tho.
8.5/10

The thing that's missing is some detail, but that's alright to not have sometimes, overall 8/10 for the signature. Also, (note this is just a guess) bitter must have increased lighting, or do some white overlay brushing to make it have a glossy, clean effect.

 

[bittermeat]

Thanks, Niko.

 

[gandalfail]

i love the sigs... really nice... especially walrein

 

[bittermeat]

New: this one turned out how I wanted it to.

CC?

 

[NikoKing]

New: this one turned out how I wanted it to.

CC?

Not bad, but the flow is really messy. Just keep the flow in one simple beam, not crazy brushing. The depth is meh. There's a bit messy areas on the focal point (Possibly from gradient or brushing), overall 7/10. Not bad, but not amazing.

 

[bittermeat]

New: this one turned out how I wanted it to.

CC?

Not bad, but the flow is really messy. Just keep the flow in one simple beam, not crazy brushing. The depth is meh. There's a bit messy areas on the focal point (Possibly from gradient or brushing), overall 7/10. Not bad, but not amazing.

Thanks for the CC once again. =}

 

[Thunder]

New: this one turned out how I wanted it to.

CC?

Like Niko noted, the flow and depth is off, but it's good to see you try out a different style

 

[Zex]

New: this one turned out how I wanted it to.

CC?

So good.

 

[bittermeat]

This one I started a week ago, and I just finished it. What do you think?

 

[Natalie27]

cool sigs!

 

[bittermeat]

cool sigs!

Glad you like 'em.

B)

 

[Thunder]

This one I started a week ago, and I just finished it. What do you think?

a little messy, and the depth is a bit better. But overall, nice job =D

 

[NikoKing]

This one I started a week ago, and I just finished it. What do you think?

Nice, the lighting's great, but like I said focus on the flow next time, This one's flow and depth gets dizzy from the C4Ds you used, try lowering the opacity of them or get C4Ds that work along with the focal point, 8/10. Oh, and the focal point is horribly placed, center it when there's negative spaces to the side, in which I see negative spots on the side. The placement of the focal helps you see it first, which it should be like that for most signatures. It's still 8/10 nonetheless though.

 

[Zex]

This one I started a week ago, and I just finished it. What do you think?

Oh my god.

Its really good.

 

[Pear]

New: this one turned out how I wanted it to.

CC?

Like Niko noted, the flow and depth is off, but it's good to see you try out a different style

Nice colors, not much depth.

@ the Rhydon sig, Nice depth and lighting, but the background is a bit distracting. Nice sigs. :O

 

[bittermeat]

Thanks everyone. Yeah, I got a little carried away with the background and made it a little distracting. I hope I'll think ahead because accidently doing so.