Mafia Call the Ships to Port: Game Thread - END GAME - TOWN VICTORY!

as Heyden said, he literally scumlocked a PR claim last game. He's just playing bad

I mean the entire push on me centered around my opening posts (I don't think I saw any case made against the actual content posts that I made after that) which is really forced, and then you have an opening post with this contradiction:
I also don't think Punchy is mafia. The whole ness thing was obviously a joke plus last game he was acting super suspicious last game and the majority voted him off. He was town during that game! These are probably crappy claims since I don't have much to work with so I'm going to wait tommorow sometime after school, like I said. (Punchy is null)
And then this post which I am very inclined to believe doesn't come from a town!Antonio:
People who haven't posted:


  1. oath2order
  2. locket
  3. amazonevan19
  4. Dedenne2

whoop
since lists and summaries of publicly available information are an easy way to feign contribution.
 
I honestly want one of the people who switched to the me/Antonio wagon yesterday which formed for like no reason. Jacob probably isn't going to be lynched today, fine. Punchy, honestly his was the weirdest of the bunch. Glow, and I generally sus her, but her's was over (perhaps legitimately?) thinking that Antonio scumslipped. I townlock Rune despite. Kinda Heyden but not really, his was over legitimate grivences

Basically, I want to lynch Vanessa espeically, and kinda Glow and Punchy if you guys don't go for Antonio

Excuse me no we're not lynching me
 
Dolby just curious when did you become suspicious of Punchy

When he began advocating for Antonio, which honestly felt like an attempt to get the lynch off Tom. I did read the post that you linked, but I initially dismissed it as town bandwagoining
 
just an FYI if Tom comes in here in the last 10 minutes and does something stupid like put a vote on himself then we're lynching him
 
Listing a bunch of quotes with no analysis about them is not really the best way to go about things. I get that you're trying to do that to provide context for what you're saying, but to me, it just looks like you're trying to fluff out your post and make it look more substantial than it already is. Rather than list quotes for context, with no analysis, I recommend you examine people's ISOs in this thread to get an idea of what a solid analysis post looks like. Whenever you quote someone, have something to say about it...don't just list 69 quotes and call that """analysis""" when it's really not

If you can't find his last game, then ask him for games he was town and games he was scum and go search it out yourself. Simple as that. And if you did, you'd see that this is how town FN usually behaves. You may not like it (I got triggered one time over it lmao), but that's just how he plays.

To be blunt, I did read your post but it definitely sounded like you were just ragging on him for not answering your question again, and nothing new was really presented imo. You're trying to make your new post sound more important than it actually is imo. Sure you're """trying""" but that doesn't mean you cannot expect us to not criticize your points if we think they're wrong. Why exactly don't you want to look into Tom and Mog anyway? They have posted some and as Dolby demonstrated, you can learn a ****ton from even a very few posts.

You have to understand that right now, your obsession with FN and deflection from inactives like Tom and Mog just heightens a lot of people's suspicions of you, cuz it looks like you're redirecting discussion away from potential scummates to someone who is widely townread

- - - Post Merge - - -

oh and when I mention dolby, I'm certainly not expecting you or anyone to provide dolby-level analysis and reads; I was just using that as an example to prove my point that Tom and Mog aren't hopelessly un-analyzable due to relative inactivity

- - - Post Merge - - -

someone else is leaving us? as if this game couldn't get more complicated >.<

- Those quotes obviously supported my statement by backing up my theory with what people had actually stated. They weren't there for no reason. Of course, I could had rephrased it better for better understanding but I was trying to hurry up and had to get back to cleaning.

- I did and I couldn't find anything. I believe I've stated that. Fireninja1, would you please link some of your games?

- I'm not purposely trying to get everyone's off the mog/tom scum train (choo choo). I just think it's stupid that we are working off of speculation rather than what we have in front of us. Shouldn't we worry about lyncing inactive later on in the game? Why do you keep on backing up fire when he/she can do it themselves?
 
We’re not lynching Antonio.

Punchy and Ghost you guys need to get a grip.

- - - Post Merge - - -

We’re not lynching Antonio.

Punchy and Ghost you guys need to get a grip.

Actually you know what idc as long as Tom dies you guys can do you what want.
 
Actually you know what idc as long as Tom dies you guys can do you what want.

Lowkey feel the same way right now

Regardless, I'm gonna protest vote for Vanessa. No way that lynch is going through, but I'm ready to switch to Tom at a moment's notice
 
I'm not purposely trying to get everyone's off the mog/tom scum train (choo choo). I just think it's stupid that we are working off of speculation rather than what we have in front of us. Shouldn't we worry about lyncing inactive later on in the game? Why do you keep on backing up fire when he/she can do it themselves?

We aren't lynching inactives lategame when lynches are even more important than they now.

Let me make this very clear: your case is focused solely on my opening posts, and the stuff that you actually did pick from that, you can't even tie to a scum motive. It's not going to get off the ground.
 
i might just vote tom to protect antonio, hes gonna die anyway so its basically a nl with a purpose
 
Back
Top