Mafia [GAME THREAD] Karen Mafia (Endgame - Mafia Wins)

[Tensu]

Antonio: lets rng lynch
Antonio: just kidding
Antonio: lets rng lynch
Antonio: jk lets vote inactive
????
His overall play style just sounds like a scum trying to grab an easy lynch without any reasoning and without analyzing. This doesn’t sit well with me.

 

[dedenne]

rn i think i might just lynch antonio. my reasoning is bc of how he is pushing the idea of lynching inactives (altho other people are in favour of lynching inactives so its not just him?) and its not the best reason but its a reason nonetheless and eod is near. sorry antonio : (

 

[Ace Marvel]

glow is mia in discussion but voted anyways, mog is straight mia.
who else? cake?

Cake left a placeholder vote a while ago and said she might not be able to vote again.

 

[Arstotzkan]

Honestly not against an Antonio lynch at all

 

[voltairenism]

guys who i vote

idk all of u seem scum

 

[epona]

Activity:
You must contribute at least five posts of substance per day. This means that if you only make a post, it needs to be more substantial than simply saying "I agree" or "RIP". If you post less than five posts but they're large, this rule may may be less strict. Substance is at the host's discretion, ultimately. Please PM the host ahead of time if you will have a specific phase that may not meet the requirement due to IRL circumstances. If it will for the rest of the game, consider letting someone in the replacements list play in your stead.

i'm not gonna lie this drawn out debate on activity feels opportunistic this close to eod
the above, from the op, suggests that once someone is over the 5 posts they'll be fine for the activity req. if they're under 5 posts but they're big, substantial posts, then the req might be waived

this is being blown out of proportion

 

[Arstotzkan]

waitup

 

[Ace Marvel]

guys who i vote

idk all of u seem scum

View attachment 303369

We are Karens, what did you expected, lol

 

[Arstotzkan]

rn i think i might just lynch antonio. my reasoning is bc of how he is pushing the idea of lynching inactives (altho other people are in favour of lynching inactives so its not just him?) and its not the best reason but its a reason nonetheless and eod is near. sorry antonio : (

But you were going along with this logic here:

i dont agree with voting evan. its not that hes posted little, hes posted nothing. he mightve even forgotten about the game idfk. but as far as lynching inactives goes, id prefer a mog lynch over evan

explain?

 

[Aerious]

i'm not gonna lie this drawn out debate on activity feels opportunistic this close to eod
the above, from the op, suggests that once someone is over the 5 posts they'll be fine for the activity req. if they're under 5 posts but they're big, substantial posts, then the req might be waived

this is being blown out of proportion

i spoke to him and asked if the timezone convo counted as substantive posts. he responded "yesish" and it's a case by case basis. this isn't tinfoil nonsense, unrelated discussion counts as substantive posts, esp to mafia who typically use it to clutter

 

[Ace Marvel]

i'm not gonna lie this drawn out debate on activity feels opportunistic this close to eod
the above, from the op, suggests that once someone is over the 5 posts they'll be fine for the activity req. if they're under 5 posts but they're big, substantial posts, then the req might be waived

this is being blown out of proportion

I agree, probably Evan will get replaced by Heyden and that's it.

 

[dedenne]

i

But you were going along with this logic here:



explain?

that was me saying if i was to lynch an inactive, i would lynch mog. i still dont really want to lynch an inactive, if thats what ur asking.

 

[FyreNyx]

@epona my bad it was Aerious

 

[epona]

wow a runaway wagon on antonio
what a suprise

 

[Arstotzkan]

i
that was me saying if i was to lynch an inactive, i would lynch mog. i still dont really want to lynch an inactive, if thats what ur asking.

gotcha

honestly fine with either but I don't like how fast antonio picked up steam so going you, sorry

 

[voltairenism]

I think antonio is just genuinely insecure and hesitant so not him
I kinda townlean dedenne and I think I wrote it before why I think it's on my paste
Also about dedenne, I don't agree and dedenne was problably my first slight town read, just because iirc she revived the thread a couple of times even with not much to say, it's weak reasoning but I guess I just get town vibes.

ok there it is

and ace idk he gives me comfort

so anyone else is fair ground. now who

 

[Endless]

waitup

explain?

Not gonna lie, when I saw the waitup post I knew you saw the same thing I saw.

Unfortunately:

voting off an inactive doesnt help town because theres literally no info to gain and theyre gonna get modkilled anyway. theres not much point in wasting a lynch on someone who hasnt said much if theyll get mked. imo its much better to lynch someone who we actually think is scum

This follows. Not a giant slip - super easy to misinterpret though.

 

[Antonio]

Antonio: lets rng lynch
Antonio: just kidding
Antonio: lets rng lynch
Antonio: jk lets vote inactive
????
His overall play style just sounds like a scum trying to grab an easy lynch without any reasoning and without analyzing. This doesn’t sit well with me.

I wouldn't be that obvious if I was mafia.

Regarding the sudden change in an Antonio Lynch, I'm down for it but against it aswell. My Town flip should give you the amount of sus needed for your Lynch because this push is definitely mafia motivated.

Finally, as I stated before, if we vote off someone that isn't inactive then that leaves 2 people dead and one replaced. If we vote off an inactive, that only leads to one person dead and one person replaced.

The more people we have alive, the better. I'm sticking with my vote on Evan whether yall are on board or not as it's the most logical with limited information.

 

[voltairenism]

Not gonna lie, when I saw the waitup post I knew you saw the same thing I saw.

Unfortunately:

This follows. Not a giant slip - super easy to misinterpret though.

what yall are talking about

 

[g u a v a]

im not digging this wagon lol i think antonio is just impulsive from what i remember in our short mafia encounter.