Mafia [GAME THREAD] New Horizons Mafia - A Classic 9er (ENDGAME)

Oh yeah I voted heyden cuz it felt like he was reaching.

There was nothing inherently wrong with his analysis it just felt misplaced,

like why analyze one persons first post incredibly deeply. Not to mention his earlier posts were kinda bad (but not bad enough to be vote worthy.) It was really the most recent post which was a mix of over-analysis followed by like a completely unexplained read all in one post that felt like a cop-out. It seems more reactionary to a push than anything else. But I think in this case, it's more maf-tell than not.

That's just a theory, a game theory.
Thanks for watching.
 
Booooooooi people bashing Ness early game can't tell his sarcasm... And no I wasn't even pressured by ness either people joked around early game I dunno about shawo man cuz it sounded like too serious about his role and all wtf????? But I dunno if we should ignore or pressing it further until i realized he used to play similar to this game (and Hi)

What I'm concern right now js just damiel seem like joining in the issue and piggybacking toad's opinions it kinda screams suspicions to me

Toad's opinion on Ness is okay but the issue really went personal I feel like both of them are town it was given a fact Ness would brought up attention to himself to see if anyone would slip up the issue

Heyden, thanks for pointing out me out that I didnt answer Q2, he's the only one who pointing that out so it proves that he's paying well attention each post (+1) I personally didn't really mean to skip the question1. If you notice my post are **** cuz I don't have a laptop anymore so boi might have a hard time skimming entire thread

- - - Post Merge - - -

Town: toads, ness, heyden
Null: glow, antoio, shawo
Scum: daniel
Can't read cuz lack of post: pathetic

My reads, subjects may change in future
 
i have an exam tmrw so i likely won't be responding much

lowkey wanna placeholder vote pathetic
 
Oh yeah I voted heyden cuz it felt like he was reaching.

There was nothing inherently wrong with his analysis it just felt misplaced,

like why analyze one persons first post incredibly deeply. Not to mention his earlier posts were kinda bad (but not bad enough to be vote worthy.) It was really the most recent post which was a mix of over-analysis followed by like a completely unexplained read all in one post that felt like a cop-out. It seems more reactionary to a push than anything else. But I think in this case, it's more maf-tell than not.

That's just a theory, a game theory.
Thanks for watching.

Oh yeah I cud say you kinda felt left out expect they will bring up previous playstyles and all you will get used to it soon it's understandable
 
Hey man, you are clearly misreading me but I'll be happy to clarify.

2) On the 3rd question, I had to actually look to see when the last time I played mafia. So, the first sentence was written before I checked and once I checked, I wrote the 2nd sentence.

3) I didn't imply they were both townies, like never. I just told them to stop insulting each other and focus. I don't like the negativity.

i don?t like the tone of the beginning of the post and i also still find it weird that you would write like that in your reply to q3. but these are stylistic things that aren?t that major

i disagree in telling them to stop bickering since that?s what pretty much started the game off. it honestly didn?t seem that heated to me since toads said he wasn?t purposefully insulting him. maf is not a kind and optimistic game so wanting to stop the ?negativity? seems to be more like wanting to stop conversation to me

i thought shawo was just trolling at first (and they still probably are) but what they said about heyden is interesting as they call out him specifically about ISOing someone when a few players have already been doing that. ISOing is pretty common in maf so shawo questioning this is odd despite them having experience in the game. in response to shawo tho, i actually like that heyden called out antonio since he wasn?t really talk about before.

i have an exam tmrw so i likely won't be responding much

lowkey wanna placeholder vote pathetic

this seems to be a call to lynch an inactive and i don?t really like that tbh. if they don?t post more they?ll probably just be replaced. by wanting to placeholder vote pathetic it seems that glow doesn?t have a strong opinion on anyone else

- - - Post Merge - - -

Booooooooi people bashing Ness early game can't tell his sarcasm... And no I wasn't even pressured by ness either people joked around early game I dunno about shawo man cuz it sounded like too serious about his role and all wtf????? But I dunno if we should ignore or pressing it further until i realized he used to play similar to this game (and Hi)

What I'm concern right now js just damiel seem like joining in the issue and piggybacking toad's opinions it kinda screams suspicions to me

Toad's opinion on Ness is okay but the issue really went personal I feel like both of them are town it was given a fact Ness would brought up attention to himself to see if anyone would slip up the issue

in my defense i started to question ness first before roads pressed ness. i agreed with what toads said yea but i don’t think that’s piggy backing. there was no other conversation happening so that’s how i joined the first one
 
I mean it's that or pathetic is 100% mafia, and that's probably less likely.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Also if you read what I said the problem I had was a hard analysis of a single post that felt like it wasn't enough to start a strong scumread.

Generally u post for a purpose, and I would say that it's transparent what haydens post was trying to do, it was seemed like a really forced way to out a read. I disagree with the conclusions offered by hayden and because of that I voted. Generally every post in the thread has a reason for why they exist and if you can figure it out you can find mafia. Still need pathetic to post I will admit that I set up for that awful joke and it was totally worth it.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Honestly damniel the more I read ur post the less I like it. It's like 4 am so mind everything, but it feels like you're saying a lot of things about specific posts in stasis rather than to how they relate to the game as a whole. Which is fine if you admit that that's the case, but it really seems like u missed a bunch of things that happened.

I really kinda hate a quote block style respond post, and it doesn't help that both ur comment on me and glow seem like u don't really understand what we were saying.

Glow has outted a couple of reads, and honestly wanting to lynch pathetic doesn't mean that glow doesn't have a strong opinion on anyone else, and even if you say that can u say that anyone here has a strong opinion on anyone? I would easily back off on any of my reads at this point in the game considering there's 10 pages.

Anyways ur post just makes me uncomfortable, want u to know that.
 
i don’t agree with what you’re saying about heyden since he clearly ISOed Antonio to bring attention to him/get him to response to his suspicions. he was the first one to focus in on antonio so i don’t agree that you say he was being reactionary. granted, he hasn’t said much since or replied to antonio’s response but i’m not sure what you’re getting at on his post

i’m not sure what you’re getting at at glow either. wanting to lynch someone for being inactive d1 is not the strongest reason to lynch. yea i get why people would what to, but i don’t agree with it. glow has also made some good call out posts but hasn’t actually said they were sus on specific players yet, which is why i’m not sure that they have strong reads yet

- - - Post Merge - - -

anyways as of now my own scum reads are still on ness and leaning towards antonio and glow if i wasn’t being clear. my votes still in the air tho
 
Keeping up with mafia is a struggle, I was in the marketplace all night but forgot about this again lol

the best argument right now is heyden's on antonio to me, I very clearly see how antonio isn't really committing to any solid thought process and his longest post is really more about defending himself than trying to contribute to any sort of vote for this day.

thoughts for just in case antonio does turn out to be scum
antonio and unravel I don't think you would both be pushing a daniel lynch if on a team
antonio and heyden doesn't work too because duh
antonio probably isn't with daniel because thats who he is pushing on, slightly

- - - Post Merge - - -

honestly glow saying to placeholder vote pathetic leans more town for her to me... glow is very sneaky and I think if she was mafia, she would have a plan in mind, not just feigning to place a vote on an inactive

- - - Post Merge - - -

I think daniel is doing a good enough amount of analysis on almost everybody which looks very town-centric over anything else

- - - Post Merge - - -

I think shawo's heyden case seems more forced than what he is saying is forced about heyden lol

- - - Post Merge - - -

unravel gives me spooky vibes, nothing their saying is contributing, her tone seems more scummy from what I remember
 
@Heyden I mean he did push a thought earlier on Daniel, right here:



I?m little surprised you didn?t have any thoughts on Antonio?s tone as I pointed out since that feels more genuine to me than most of what daniel?s posted.
Hmmm okay I saw it more as a question than a direct push but I see where you?re coming from.

As for Antonio
1) Then why didn?t you say that
2) If you correct yourself, wouldn?t you just delete the wrong piece of information and replace it with the correct? Unless that?s just how you type lol but it comes off as forced confusion to me.
3) I know it was early within the game, but your mafia guess was literally ?Ness and Toads?, then you told them to stop fighting?? It just feels so inconsistent. Like if you thought it was a town vs town then sure that makes sense, but why would you tell off a supposed scum vs scum?? idk am I understanding wrong
4) Yeah fair enough you kinda did

And for shawo, I always analyse peoples RQS so its not really out of character for me, but yeah my reads kinda weak idk what to say lol but I?m just not feeling the bandwagon on Daniel. To be fair your case is as weak as mine, so we?re even.

Rn obviously my vote > most likely Antonio, subject to change but probably not either.
Goodnight
 
To me Ness' drifting thoughts post seems like perfectly constructed from a "he is a mafia" standpoint. I was leaning towards ness being towns based on his reaction, but I could also see it as he tried to come out super visible, but then was hella pissed at getting more than he bargained for. So his initial reaction seems null for me, because he's been the same in either alignment before.

But his thoughts thread to me almost looks too perfect. Think of it from a mafia standpoint. Like he perfectly split the game into two halves, enough people to stick to riding and questioning for the entirety of the game and people that he town leans to kill off at night. Even having a person to suspect for the rest of this day and end up voting if nothing else comes along.... I do literally the exact same thing when I'm scum, of like trying to perfectly plan things. It just feels very, experienced player mafia post-ish to me.

Vs I look for the more experienced players to give off-the-cuff types of thoughts and go from person to person.

I'm torn between probably voting for ness or antonio

- - - Post Merge - - -

If ness were to be scum then for sure one of his town-leans is his scummate
 
Actually I’m voting idk what time I’m waking up, nor what time this ends lol

- - - Post Merge - - -

Worst case scenario I’ll flip to Pathetic if the Antonio lynch won’t happen
 
Hmmm okay I saw it more as a question than a direct push but I see where you’re coming from.

As for Antonio
1) Then why didn’t you say that
2) If you correct yourself, wouldn’t you just delete the wrong piece of information and replace it with the correct? Unless that’s just how you type lol but it comes off as forced confusion to me.
3) I know it was early within the game, but your mafia guess was literally ‘Ness and Toads’, then you told them to stop fighting?? It just feels so inconsistent. Like if you thought it was a town vs town then sure that makes sense, but why would you tell off a supposed scum vs scum?? idk am I understanding wrong
4) Yeah fair enough you kinda did

And for shawo, I always analyse peoples RQS so its not really out of character for me, but yeah my reads kinda weak idk what to say lol but I’m just not feeling the bandwagon on Daniel. To be fair your case is as weak as mine, so we’re even.

Rn obviously my vote > most likely Antonio, subject to change but probably not either.
Goodnight

I don't have a response for number 1 and 2. I think they are valid responses to my statements but I'm not sure what to say besides my original statements were the truth. I ain't putting too much thought into my posts for there to be

For question 3, I was just saying ness and toad to stop bickering. It wasn't a serious claim. It was wayyy too early to have a sus read and why would i force myself to come to a conclusion. I thought that was obvious.

- - - Post Merge - - -

i don’t like the tone of the beginning of the post and i also still find it weird that you would write like that in your reply to q3. but these are stylistic things that aren’t that major

i disagree in telling them to stop bickering since that’s what pretty much started the game off. it honestly didn’t seem that heated to me since toads said he wasn’t purposefully insulting him. maf is not a kind and optimistic game so wanting to stop the “negativity” seems to be more like wanting to stop conversation to me

I'm autistic, tone isn't my strong suit.

Also on the statement on negativity, telling someone to get off a there high horse was quite rude. Y'all can be negative without the isults.

- - - Post Merge - - -

I'll have a damniel read post later, i got class now.
 
Hey you little ****s Antonio isn’t going to be the lynch today

- - - Post Merge - - -

Alright I’m getting sick of Daniel being handed a free pass just because he’s posting sweet looking posts devoid of real content. I’m not going to let you ****s lynch me or Antonio today.

- - - Post Merge - - -



Sweaty, my pinky promise to you is that I'm town. You can feel this way, just know that I typed that post out to address some things I was thinking before bed, it's not as deep as you're thinking it is.

this is the kind of tone that i don’t like. it’s coming off as too arrogant even though you haven’t said why we should lynch you or antonio

anyways if you make a post as to why you think i’m not providing any content/am scum ill be sure to reply. but your posts are making much of a case on anyone being scum or town tbh

- - - Post Merge - - -

honestly glow saying to placeholder vote pathetic leans more town for her to me... glow is very sneaky and I think if she was mafia, she would have a plan in mind, not just feigning to place a vote on an inactive

unravel gives me spooky vibes, nothing their saying is contributing, her tone seems more scummy from what I remember

can you explain more on these two things cuz they’re a little vague. why can’t a placeholder vote be a “plan”? also i wouldn’t say that unravel hasn’t contributed anything bc she voiced her suspicion on me and it’s not for a reason that’s been stated before. she also townread heyden for being thorough in reading the posts. she made a clear read list so i wouldn’t say she’s done nothing

- - - Post Merge - - -

shouldn’t*

- - - Post Merge - - -

and aren’t* god i need to proofread
 
Back
Top