Restrictions for criminals and the mentally ill, and by mentally ill, I mean ill to the point they're handicapped by it. Like they hallucinations, delusions, violent outbursts, things along those lines. I don't mean people with mental health problems like anxiety or depression because those are things that can't really be proven if they're consistently denied.
I also agree that banning guns is a terrible idea for reasons I've stated a hundred times already. I'm glad to see some people making sense in this thread.
so u think people who have been sentenced for weed or idk tax evasion wont be allowed to own guns bc theyre Criminals?? shouldn't non violent criminals be able to defend themselves against the Bad Guys, do you just want them to get shot to death (since we all know that literally the only way to avoid being murdered w a gun is to own a gun urself)
why not implement a control system that every citizen is required to go through, just so we can know which ones should get guns and which shouldn't :')
also im really sick of the whole mental illness thing haha. yes there are people who live with mental illness and commit crimes but being mentally ill doesnt make you dangerous. mentally ill people are more at risk of being victims of crimes or hurt themselves. the percentage of crimes that are commited by severely mentally ill people isnt way out of proportion.
i hate when people blame mentally ill people for gun violence. you just don't want to admit that the current dituation in america and the current gun laws cause crimes commited with guns. yeah, america is unsafe in a lot of places, but if you own a gun you are making it a more unsafe place.
haha Also I Have A Fun Idea; men shouldnt be allowed to own guns because they are too dangerous and violent. a majority of violent crimes are commited by men, it has been noted and time again that men are more violent than women. wouldn't it be logical to not let them own guns? you know, for everyone elses safety :')
Wow, way to misrepresent my viewpoint. No, I don't think someone charged with possession of weed or other minor drugs, or tax evasion (or a whole myriad of other minor crimes) should lose the right to own a gun. I do, however, think people charged with things like assault, robbery, rape, pedophilia, kidnapping, or criminal homicide (not in self defense) should lose the right to own a gun and to vote. I give zero ****s about those kinds of people.
I'm not blaming gun violence on mentally ill people. I'm saying that if you're mentally ill to the point you can't tell what's real and what isn't, you shouldn't be owning a gun. I know that not every mentally ill person is dangerous, and note that I DIDN'T SAY THEY WERE. Jesus kid. The gun laws currently in place don't cause gun violence. ****ty people do. And, like Ably.Saucey said, gun violence tends to happen in places with strict gun control laws. This is because gun free zones make for an entire zone of easy targets. If someone thinks you're armed, they're not going to rob or assault you on your way to your car in a dark parking garage, for example. An armed society is a much more polite society. And once again, only law abiding citizens would fork over their guns were they to be banned, and they'd only make themselves more vulnerable to the people that already don't give a **** about the law, or anyone but themselves.
I own 3 guns by the way, and I'm in no way, shape or form making the US a more dangerous place. They've only ever been used on a target at a range, and I'd very much like to keep it that way.
Your profile says you're male. Please explain to me why you're talking **** about yourself.
Your profile says you're male. Please explain to me why you're talking **** about yourself.
im not, im just saying that men generally are more violent than women.
I believe Miii and rbell2915 make very good points in this thread.
I read an article from a conservative blogging site called TownHall. The writer of the article on gun control suggested that the best way to prevent public shootings is to bring back religion in schools since it teaches morals. Ever since we got rid of the mandated school prayer, our country has gotten more immoral. The increase in public shootings, even if we kept them under control, is one of them. But thanks to our deeply divided nation, I don't think bringing back religion in schools is gonna work.
im not, im just saying that men generally are more violent than women.
I believe Miii and rbell2915 make very good points in this thread.
I read an article from a conservative blogging site called TownHall. The writer of the article on gun control suggested that the best way to prevent public shootings is to bring back religion in schools since it teaches morals. Ever since we got rid of the mandated school prayer, our country has gotten more immoral. The increase in public shootings, even if we kept them under control, is one of them. But thanks to our deeply divided nation, I don't think bringing back religion in schools is gonna work.
I completely disagree with that, and though I haven't read the article myself, it already sounds like the guy is religious himself, and speaking from personal experience. I have to go to work soon, but I might check it out later.
If you want your kid to go to a religious school, put them in private school. Separation of church and state and freedom of religion in the US are two very important things that we can't just toss aside in an attempt to deal with individuals committing violent crimes. I think it's up to parents to instill values and morals in their children. I think it's also up to parents to spend time with their kids, to be there for them and to watch them closely while they're growing up to look for negative behavior/ character traits developing so they can correct them. I personally wouldn't want anyone else telling my kids what to believe, that they have to pray or anything else like that. You can certainly uphold traditionally Christian values without actually believing in a god.
I think that allowing teachers to carry firearms on them during the school day would be extremely beneficial in lowering the chance of a school shooting.
Gun free zones just means open season to psychopaths.
The argument that you need to "protect yourselves" is plain ********.