Muffun Basket (Muffun's Gallery)

Jas0n said:
Muffun said:
flarenon2.png


Hi.

This was originally going to be with Entei, but then I decided to use Flareon and then I don't really know what happened.
Quite like what you were going for, but the colours are awful. Looks like you've used mud to colour it xD
I was trying to create some sort of a dusty-smokey effect but I guess it didn't work. xD
 
Muffun said:
Jas0n said:
Muffun said:
flarenon2.png


Hi.

This was originally going to be with Entei, but then I decided to use Flareon and then I don't really know what happened.
Quite like what you were going for, but the colours are awful. Looks like you've used mud to colour it xD
I was trying to create some sort of a dusty-smokey effect but I guess it didn't work. xD
I like it.. didn't/don't think it's like mud :/

but i don't have much experience making sigs/graphics in general

or i could just be loving that it's an eeveelution. ogod pokeman
 
The line is amazing, though the focal seems to have a low quality appeal to it. I love the color.
 
The line is a kind of love/hate thing.. depends on the style of sig you like really. I'm not too fond of how it breaks the flow, I think it'd be better in a place where it doesn't actually break it.

I agree with m12 about the low quality feel though. I think you should look up some tutorials on lighting and focal points, your sigs would greatly improve if you dedicated some time purely to sorting out those things.
 
Thanks for the feedback. I think I used too many exposure layers lol. But I'll be sure to check some out.
 
Muffun said:
flarenon2.png


Hi.

This was originally going to be with Entei, but then I decided to use Flareon and then I don't really know what happened.
Original pokemon for the win!!!

Love Eevee and all the original evolutions
 
Your sigs are awesome. I can't concrit. since I suck at them, but yeah, nice work!
 
Muffun said:
pretty interesting, but just a tad bit lq though. i don't see anything else bad about it, but the lighting could be mildly improved (not that it's bad, I can still identify it). I like the stock you used.
 
Oh, xD

It looks good. But, like Niko said, the lighting would look better a bit more darker or something.

It still looks great, but might look a bit better edited.

*Likes*
 
I do like a lot of them, but I think there isn't enough contrast in some... they all seem a little bright but I think it is actually more of a contrast issue... iono you can probably try messing with that a little.
 
over saturated >.< nice c4d work tho. the double focal thing with her face on the left is really working for me tho. lighting and depth have kinda been lost cuz of the gmaps and filters u used. i really love the placement of the c4ds and everything, just work on your filters m8. kiu
 
vintage.png


Minor bump...I'm a little rusty. I was going for a vintage look as implied by the text.

It's pretty dark though. :s
 
nice one. effects look very cool. text could use some work. but why do u make all your tags so flat :( i guess its an artistic decision, but i think it makes ur tags lack depth and not log as nice as they could
 
Eh I don't know, I like the exposure look I guess. Just a personal preference. My mind is weird, if I don't have it, it feels really half-done to me. :x But I should experiment more.
 
frosted butts.

mystic-1.png


parasolwoman.png


really digging the second one. Are we having a halloween sig/gfx competition because I want to enter
 
Back
Top