Oh, no worries! if im understanding this right...(I'm sorry if you're not opposing of neopronouns in this reply, I'm reading it as kind of ambiguous so excuse me if I'm misinterpreting your intentions in this, but I'd still like to get this off my chest regardless if only for others who could be one of those people within the community that you're talking about)
So I get this, and I could understand the feel of frustration at people, who in your opinion, seem to be making it harder for the community you're defending to be taken seriously. I've caught myself being guilty of it before, but it's important to think about Why exactly you want to police the people to suppress their expression in fear of you looking silly, instead of fighting to have them taken more seriously by opposers? I feel it's similar to more masculine gay men feeling spite towards more feminine gay men for fitting oppressive stereotypes. Or binary trans people who make efforts to try and convert transphobes by appealing to their existing sensibilities and ideas of the gender binary, being upset at the existence of gender-nonconforming people because it opens up the discussion that those sensibilities are actually in fact, completely wrong and it puts a damper in that binary trans persons efforts. But it's important not to become a gatekeeper only the sake of public image towards The Straights. You shouldn't make those """outliers""" of the community fight their own battles just because you'd afraid of shame of being seen with them, if that makes sense.
im against neopronouns as they became just... bizarre over the years. i edited my post to clarify even more! anyone who is trans, nb, etc are perfectly cool. its the people who ARENT who created them for mockery or trends. they are annoying and painted a bad image years ago that took a while to heal (which made community members and activists angry)
Last edited: