toadsworthy
Tangsworthy
24 hours until the end of day 2
Last edited:
kek your scum sooo.I'm inclined to step down from Panda seeing if she responds, but either f11 or Cleb, more Cleb unless his reads on the players not done yet convince me otherwise
theres more stuff going against you than Jacob. Ur both scum but it will be easier to take you out first.What's with the sudden 180 vote from Jacob to me after that post, I literally just repeated what was on my color code list in broader terms
- - - Post Merge - - -
If Panda doesn't wanna claim then I'd like to hear who she wants lynched today at least, she's just become a big road block rn tbh
Not enough obviously. Is 'Bringing up old meta, town leaning Nightmares and PR fishing Panda' really enough for you to be convinced I'm definitely scum?theres more stuff going against you than Jacob. Ur both scum but it will be easier to take you out first.
yeah pretty much. i also feel it in my bones.Not enough obviously. Is 'Bringing up old meta, town leaning Nightmares and PR fishing Panda' really enough for you to be convinced I'm definitely scum?
ur gonna answer yes but w/e
Indecisive on scum numbers, bring submissive and not willing to lead town, saying 'wow' as an indication of something, pointing out a reaction test that won't work on me, bringing up meta and town leaning someone based on gut.It's interesting seeing Hayden avoid that great post xcleb wrote about him also.
Ok I know you're busy and such but could you just give a few names on who you'd like to lynch today at the very least? names is all I needOk look I don't have much time to post I have been reading through the thread, but I'll be honest it's been quickly while I've been busy, I don't want to claim but sense I'm busy and can't write long post to clear myself, I will if you need me to do we can move past this whole "pandas scum" bs...let me know if you want me to or not and in the mean time I'll read up and try to make reads/a case. Thank you and sorry for my busy schedule.
Oh whoops I didn't notice the vote sorry
Tensu, it seems that the easy bandwagon last day was Corrie, yet she didn't vote on her. I would hardly say sus on crys is a bandwagon. Why aren't you critizing people who were on corrie's wagon?
I have work tm so when I get home I'll post thorough reads
Ok look I don't have much time to post I have been reading through the thread, but I'll be honest it's been quickly while I've been busy, I don't want to claim but sense I'm busy and can't write long post to clear myself, I will if you need me to do we can move past this whole "pandas scum" bs...let me know if you want me to or not and in the mean time I'll read up and try to make reads/a case. Thank you and sorry for my busy schedule.
yo are you scum? Your voting cleb because he made reads you don't agree with? Does anyone hear this nonsense? Also he's not even done with them yet. Lmao y'all are wild. There more going against Jacob/heyden then Cleb lol. Like i scum read cleb a little but it's not tangible it's a feeling. Cleb hasn't done anything scummy.True, I guess "bandwagoning" wasn't really the correct term to what I was trying to say. I meant something more like "an easy vote to get away with". I'm not going to criticize Jacob's vote on Corrie because he brought up a good point and was logical. Trundle and crys, I'm not as sure about. If you guys would like to explain why you chose to vote Corrie please do or show me where to look. As for Zendel, I do think that his vote was a bandwagon. And Panda just voted for Corrie to save her own ass.
Today, I'd be cool with either a lynch on Panda or Cleb. I couldn't really follow Cleb's reasoning with Heyden's read, his points don't make her too indicative of scum imo. His read on Nightmares seems too generous, I'm not sure why everyone was so quick to believe she was town again. Her reads were good but if she can't follow them up by making more points and actively pressing, she's basically sheeping off others. I'm confident there is scum between Cleb and Nightmares, but I'd like to hear more from Lani before considering to vote on her.
Panda has made two decent sized posts justifying herself to us about why she can't post. :/
ZeFeZe, please come out and address my posts about you soon. Your silence is making me more suspicious. Also I'd like to hear a little more from Amanda and Prima obviously.
- - - Post Merge - - -
wow um just realized how rude ass sounded oops
I thought it'd be censored lmao
I love how you think I'm scum-reading you based on this, but when you look at my read...Indecisive on scum numbers
I understand that some people may not read through the entirety of the reads I've made thus far based on the length of each one alone, but that's no reason for you to sit and say something that just isn't true. No, this was not part of the reason I was scum-leaning you at the time, but you sitting here and twisting my words to make it seem that way is very suspect.This seems a bit quick to just kind of flip like that, with their last post saying that 5 scum is unlikely, though it seems like a very submissive post at that. My thought is that, based on his willingness to change his opinion on a dime, along with his general submissiveness when Panda made an argument, Heyden could either be Town who doesn't want to lead, or Mafia who doesn't want to get caught so easily. Personally, I'd lean more toward the former (based on this post alone), considering that, at the time, Panda was one of the main driving forces during the Day. With that in mind, getting away from a discussion like this would generate more time for the greater task of actually finding scum. Obviously there was a miss on the lynch Yesterday, but this shows that Heyden is indirectly proactive during the Day.
So I did a quick skim through my read on you again to see how many times I actually used your submissive behavior as an argument, and the biggest moment was in the read I've already posted above, which is the exact same point that your last point was making. The second time I brought up this behavior, I mentioned it as a continuation of that you had already showcased in the first point, and sure, it does kind of lead to the same idea. You've got me there. Here's the quote, with context...bring submissive and not willing to lead town
Originally Posted by Heyden
Don't know why f11 voted me with like 0 evidence but I'm guessing it's a supposed 'reaction test' of some sort, not sure why I was their first choice of push so I'm definitely wary of them. Anyhow, nothing has seemed to really have happened I guess, but I don't really like the way Zendel just stormed off as soon as he was being pressured...
Note the two bolded portions of these quotes, and realize that what I'm saying about this behavior is completely precise to the situation. So, continuing that argument is perfectly sound, considering it's what actually went on in these posts.As for his statement after this, the submissive behavior I mentioned earlier somewhat continues, albeit indirectly, in that he states that nothing has really happened over time. This, to me, looks like he's sitting and waiting for something to happen, rather than trying to make something happen himself. This post does only really have context in terms of the time between this post and his last, but this idea is proving to be a common theme for him at this point.
I will admit that this isn't the most solid piece of my read on you (I still stand by it, though I believe there are better points in the read in the overall scale of things). I can live with putting this aside to focus on the other points.saying 'wow' as an indication of something
Yes, because I literally stated that explicitly telling someone that they're reaction testing you isn't going to help your case with that person. It's a basic point that bears no explanation, since the point of reaction testing is to keep it secret until one is ready to use it as evidence.pointing out a reaction test that won't work on me
Um, no??? I don't know how you even thought of this as a possibility from my read on Nightmares, but it just flat out isn't true. The change in play-style I noted in my overall assessment is in reference to a quote I had covered earlier in the read...bringing up meta and town leaning someone based on gut.
Originally Posted by Nightmares
- - - Post Merge - - -
However, I may change my vote to Panda if I have time later.... her aggressiveness and reliance on everyone else to make the thread active is weird
Idk
This is not meta. This is in-game and live, so it is all completely valid for this specific game. Chalking this up to meta is completely absurd.The second post seems to now cling onto the opinions of others, which is in stark contrast to how she did things before. Though, a lot has happened between this post and her last, so I do suppose that it at least makes a little sense that this happened.
So I'm going to separate this from your post-merge, since this is really important to address. Telling somebody that their argument are invalid and then proceeding not to defend any of them is just going to make somebody stand by their points even more, and even go back to reinforce the arguments in question. This doesn't just apply to you here. If ANYBODY in this game made a post like this at any point, it would never help their case, and this post doesn't help your case here.I don't know how to counter that at all bc they're all pretty invalid so?
If they were self-explanatory, I would not have made any of those points, because I would have already known the answer to each of them at the time I posted. I don't know what you're getting at with this, but you're not going to just use this as a cop-out to just not defend your actions. I still want answers.well I wouldn't say invalid but I don't really know how to defend myself from those points bc a of them are self explanatory
yo are you scum? Your voting cleb because he made reads you don't agree with? Does anyone hear this nonsense? Also he's not even done with them yet. Lmao y'all are wild. There more going against Jacob/heyden then Cleb lol. Like i scum read cleb a little but it's not tangible it's a feeling. Cleb hasn't done anything scummy.
I can say confidently that I still did bring up some points about Nightmares that could be seen as scum-leans. I try to stay as objective as possible in my reads, but if I find something that I think will lead into something bigger, I will pursue that point of interest. Nightmares' posts have seemed slightly off-kilter throughout the game, but I don't believe that there's any point where she truly looks like she's scum, like other people have mentioned.what? All I'm saying is that he was much harsher on his read of Heyden than on his read of Nightmares. It just seems a bit off and nitpicky, it's just not like him to overlook Lani's strange behavior towards the beginning of the game and at least regocnise a little suspicion from that. idk I can't really specify, I just have a hunch.
I can say confidently that I still did bring up some points about Nightmares that could be seen as scum-leans. I try to stay as objective as possible in my reads, but if I find something that I think will lead into something bigger, I will pursue that point of interest. Nightmares' posts have seemed slightly off-kilter throughout the game, but I don't believe that there's any point where she truly looks like she's scum, like other people have mentioned.
In other words, I wasn't completely forgiving of Nightmares' posts. I just don't believe that any of those lead into anything more serious.