Mafia Papers Please Mafia: Game Over, Town Wins!
- Thread starter Dolby
- Start date
Goddamnit Tom, you arrived like 3 minutes too late. And worse yet, you're probably right about Trojan. I don't think Ness will flip red based on the private conversations I've had with him but it's too late now. Granted, I must say I probably would have voted for him myself based on only the in-thread actions and messages he forwarded. Simply too explosively wishy-washy in the end.
PandaDarling
Purple People Eater
@ Nesswhy didn't you share more with us so that you didnt have to die with this information, it could have helped the rest of us.
Arstotzkan
A scum mom
I'm getting a drink that was intense.
@Ness Looks like we've got an hour to talk so let's. You feel like there was literally nothing to go off of besides gut feeling today?
@Ness Looks like we've got an hour to talk so let's. You feel like there was literally nothing to go off of besides gut feeling today?
glow
not ur aesthetic
Trojan:
honestly i?m glad you?re choosing to change your playstyle, although i don?t like how you?re acting right now...
i browsed through DA:I mafia where trojan was scum and i don?t understand where this lack of confidence is coming from (bolded). throughout the game he was aloof and trolly, and with the way the games that i?ve played with him he also acted this way as town. but with how he was killed in the games i?ve played with him, a change in playstyle makes sense. i don?t like how tom and others are attacking him for acting as behavior that would benefit town.
i?m inclined to think he?s town because it seems like this is a genuine emotional response, but seriously trojan don?t give up/act like you can?t be of help to us or i?ll change my mind.
http://www.belltreeforums.com/search.php?searchid=5389727
Jacob
why are u so flipfloppy
jacob starts off saying that he?s not against a policy lynch. imho town should be against a policy lynch when the person that?s being nominated is changing their playstyle to actually benefit town (or at least attempting to). pushing a policy lynch is almost as easy as pushing an inactive lynch, because basically you just push someone and then let that person dig their own grave. he goes on to say that he thinks tom?s reasoning for it is weak, like he doesn?t wanna be associated with him and say that he has his own reasoning. i actually believe that tom was reaction testing, and i find it odd that jacob ignored that possibility entirely.
tbh how would you feel if you were being nominated for a policy lynch when you are trying to play less like a troll? unmotivated and discouraged entirely, and that?s what i see from trojan.
i actually lol?d at the idea of a no lynch. anyone that is considering this is scummy to me. this is a horrible idea, gives us no information, and we?ve lynched when we had a LOT less to go off of.
then he says that trojan would be a good ?policy lynch? i mean wat
you literally typed that you think he?s town and then in the same sentence say that trojan would be a good lynch, am i missing the logic here or
in my opinion the only good policy lynch is lucanosa
as they?re known to lurk for the majority of the game and even 4-5 days into games they are just like ?yeah idk i can?t do reads? which provides nothing throughout the entirety of the game regardless of their alignment
Tom:
i genuinely hope this whole policy lynch on trojan is a reaction test. i get pushing one on lucanosa, on dough, even kit. and in the event that trojan is mafia, he is a lot easier to read than those three.
i?m only gonna quote a few but why do tom?s posts sound like trundle to me rn...i just expect more logic and reasoning from tom i guess? while i completely agree about the NL, i really want to know tom?s reasoning that a policy lynch on trojan is better besides meta. it?d be a different story if it doesn?t seem like trojan?s changing his direction, but it seems like he is. this incessant pushing just really rubs me the wrong way, he doesn?t even seem to be giving him the chance.
the fact that d1 is usually a ****show is true but actually this d1 was pretty productive in my opinion. in the last two games i?ve played d1 has been mostly ****posting but i completely disagree with that being true for this game. the timing he said that was off to me too, there were people making pretty good arguments around the same time he said that and it was less than ten pages into d1, which is pretty early to make the assumption that the whole day would be a ****show.\
______________
soz this post is pretty rushed, i wanted to do at least two more analyses on players but i took longer than i thought typing this up and i gtg to work. i?ll be back after then, around 10pm pst though, and finish some of the players that have stood out to me. today i?ll be voting for Jacob for reasons stated and if tom is town aligned it would be bad to lose him so early on.
also I currently tr Ayaya for taking the time to PM me reminding me to post thx
honestly i?m glad you?re choosing to change your playstyle, although i don?t like how you?re acting right now...
i browsed through DA:I mafia where trojan was scum and i don?t understand where this lack of confidence is coming from (bolded). throughout the game he was aloof and trolly, and with the way the games that i?ve played with him he also acted this way as town. but with how he was killed in the games i?ve played with him, a change in playstyle makes sense. i don?t like how tom and others are attacking him for acting as behavior that would benefit town.
i?m inclined to think he?s town because it seems like this is a genuine emotional response, but seriously trojan don?t give up/act like you can?t be of help to us or i?ll change my mind.
http://www.belltreeforums.com/search.php?searchid=5389727
Jacob
why are u so flipfloppy
jacob starts off saying that he?s not against a policy lynch. imho town should be against a policy lynch when the person that?s being nominated is changing their playstyle to actually benefit town (or at least attempting to). pushing a policy lynch is almost as easy as pushing an inactive lynch, because basically you just push someone and then let that person dig their own grave. he goes on to say that he thinks tom?s reasoning for it is weak, like he doesn?t wanna be associated with him and say that he has his own reasoning. i actually believe that tom was reaction testing, and i find it odd that jacob ignored that possibility entirely.
tbh how would you feel if you were being nominated for a policy lynch when you are trying to play less like a troll? unmotivated and discouraged entirely, and that?s what i see from trojan.
i actually lol?d at the idea of a no lynch. anyone that is considering this is scummy to me. this is a horrible idea, gives us no information, and we?ve lynched when we had a LOT less to go off of.
then he says that trojan would be a good ?policy lynch? i mean wat
you literally typed that you think he?s town and then in the same sentence say that trojan would be a good lynch, am i missing the logic here or
in my opinion the only good policy lynch is lucanosa
as they?re known to lurk for the majority of the game and even 4-5 days into games they are just like ?yeah idk i can?t do reads? which provides nothing throughout the entirety of the game regardless of their alignment
Tom:
Could be getting coached from your mafia team.
- - - Post Merge - - -
Also I swear to god if we have a no lynch God help you all for the wrath me and Mouthwashies will inflict on you all.
i genuinely hope this whole policy lynch on trojan is a reaction test. i get pushing one on lucanosa, on dough, even kit. and in the event that trojan is mafia, he is a lot easier to read than those three.
i?m only gonna quote a few but why do tom?s posts sound like trundle to me rn...i just expect more logic and reasoning from tom i guess? while i completely agree about the NL, i really want to know tom?s reasoning that a policy lynch on trojan is better besides meta. it?d be a different story if it doesn?t seem like trojan?s changing his direction, but it seems like he is. this incessant pushing just really rubs me the wrong way, he doesn?t even seem to be giving him the chance.
the fact that d1 is usually a ****show is true but actually this d1 was pretty productive in my opinion. in the last two games i?ve played d1 has been mostly ****posting but i completely disagree with that being true for this game. the timing he said that was off to me too, there were people making pretty good arguments around the same time he said that and it was less than ten pages into d1, which is pretty early to make the assumption that the whole day would be a ****show.\
______________
soz this post is pretty rushed, i wanted to do at least two more analyses on players but i took longer than i thought typing this up and i gtg to work. i?ll be back after then, around 10pm pst though, and finish some of the players that have stood out to me. today i?ll be voting for Jacob for reasons stated and if tom is town aligned it would be bad to lose him so early on.
also I currently tr Ayaya for taking the time to PM me reminding me to post thx
Arstotzkan
A scum mom
Oh rip he can't post anymore? That sucks balls.
Damnit Ness, if you're really town then I'm sad you didn't claim earlier when things started looking so sour for you. Granted, it all happened incredibly fast. But you kind of shot yourself in the foot on this one, mate. Too much confusion on your part in the end, even though I believe you honestly just tried to do the right thing. Argh. I hate when this happens.
EnderWiggin
Senior Member
You can't post anymore.
- - - Post Merge - - -
Also voting thread is closed, Ness.
EnderWiggin
Senior Member
Also, claim before the deadline? Please?
EnderWiggin
Senior Member
Check the voting thread.
Arstotzkan
A scum mom
