Alolan_Apples
“Assorted” Collector
Even as of today, I still think leggings aren’t pants, nor should they be worn as pants.
i think the same way. As something underneath a skirt or bodysuit, leggings are fine but never as pants. They just don’t look right as pants. Same with yoga pants.Even as of today, I still think leggings aren’t pants, nor should they be worn as pants.
I'll take those over the people sagging their pants, because at least leggings cover the skin.Even as of today, I still think leggings aren’t pants, nor should they be worn as pants.
Leggings that cover your feet (aka tights) aren’t good as pants either. But they do work well with dresses, especially winter dresses.i think the same way. As something underneath a skirt or bodysuit, leggings are fine but never as pants. They just don’t look right as pants. Same with yoga pants.
Now that is a fashion disaster. As much as I don’t like leggings as pants, it’s at least not that bad.I'll take those over the people sagging their pants, because at least leggings cover the skin.
I don’t really like Family Guy that much. It’s also competitively offensive for the sake of it.I wouldn't say many of Family Guy's jokes are too horrible to watch. There is one that comes to mind, though, which is the Quagmire and Simpsons joke, only because… why did they have to drag The Simpsons into it? I don't need and definitely don't want to see Quagmire rape Marge, and then hear him shoot the entire family.
Also, I really don't understand their hate against Creationists.
So then you'd rather die than admit that Die Hard is a holiday movie?There is no force on this planet that is gonna get me to admit that Die Hard is a holiday movie.
Brownie points for the effort lol.So then you'd rather die than admit that Die Hard is a holiday movie?
…
I'm sorry, I'll go leave for the rest of the day.
I feel like if someone really hates a group of people, they wouldn't care if they get punished for committing a crime against them, no matter how bad it is. There are people willing to commit mass genocide, and I'm sure you'd get the death penalty for that, so I don't think it would change anything. People just need to stop being racist, it's stupid.My question. If we have stricter laws against hate crimes and anti-semitism with much harsher punishments, would that deter hate crimes and bigotry? Or is it going to make things worse?
I kinda feel that way too. While stricter hate crime laws could make marginalized groups safer, the problem is that when someone holds extreme ideologies like bigotry, they would respond with violence when things aren’t going their way. Sure that if the government doesn’t step in, marginalized groups will still fall victims to hate. But if the government steps in, and they resolve the problem, then the bigots that do commit hate crimes would start attacking the government or threaten to attack the government because they’ll feel that the government “is becoming a dictatorship” (when it’s not). That is a serious concern. Granted, not everyone would respond with terrorism if the government does something others don’t like. But given the OKC Bombing and Jan 6 Insurrection, there is a possibility that hate crime crackdowns would anger the bigots to this point.^I think it would make things worse. Couldn't tell ya why, though...more of a suspicion than anything.
Fair point. There are many political arguments where stricter laws against something isn’t going to stop criminals since they would still commit the crimes anyway. The problem is that the frequency is going up, not that the crimes exist.I feel like if someone really hates a group of people, they wouldn't care if they get punished for committing a crime against them, no matter how bad it is. There are people willing to commit mass genocide, and I'm sure you'd get the death penalty for that, so I don't think it would change anything. People just need to stop being racist, it's stupid.