Politics Are Still Trending

[moonford]

I'm going to go watch Fox News. A trusted news network. Fair and balanced. Most Watched, Most Trusted.

That is the stupidest thing I have ever heard from you. (sorry)

Fox News is heavily biased, they are not fair. The only good thing about them is how funny and stupid they are, which = entertainment which also = more views from leftwing people.

58% of Republicans trust it (not surprised you trust and love it so much) so it is the main Republican news channel while Democrats watch both NBC (15%) and CNN (32%) and 3% of Democrats watch Fox news by the way, 3%....Clearly Democrats are more diverse and don't watch one specific channel like Republicans do.

If you're being sarcastic, k.

 

[Ghost Soda]

That is the stupidest thing I have ever heard from you.

Fox News is heavily biased, they are not fair. The only good thing about them is how funny and stupid they are, which = entertainment which also = more views from leftwing people.

58% of Republicans trust it, so it is the main Republican news channel while Democrats watch both NBC (15%) and CNN (32%) and 3% of Democrats watch Fox news by the way, 3%....

Honestly, I thought/think they were/are being sarcastic.

 

[moonford]

Honestly, I thought/think they were/are being sarcastic.

They weren't, I think they adore Washington post (they back up their statements with it a lot) and that's where I got the statistics from, I'm positive they aren't being sarcastic because it wouldn't be like them. Just pointing a few things out that's all.

 

[-Apples-]

Honestly, I thought/think they were/are being sarcastic.

That guy who trusted Fox News is truly conservative. Also, to a liberal, Fox News really isn't the worst. Wanna know worse, try Breitbart or Liberal Logic 101 (an image site). One is even more conservative biased, and the other is very anti-liberal. If you see these, then you would know that Fox News isn't the worst news source to a liberal.

For me, I just read random articles regardless of source (as well as forums and comments) and form an opinion. Take for example, Ferguson. They tried to claim that Michael Brown had his hands up and was shot because of race. Forensic evidence has proven that Michael Brown got into a fight with the cop and grabbed for his gun. What did I think? I think he was guilty and the cop that shot him dead wasn't, but I also think that Michael Brown isn't the bad guy in the case. It would be the media for making it look like a story about race instead of what really happened. I also have negative views towards the rioters and protesters, people who think Wilson is guilty and were extreme to their views, and anyone who thinks Wilson was racist, but supports him for that. So not only I disregard the "hands up don't shoot" thing a lie, but I also think the media is the real guilty party in the case. That's how I read from sources and form an opinion.

As for what news source I hate most, it would be Rolling Stone, Slate, and Salon. I still read them to see what they had to say about a certain issue.

 

[Ghost Soda]

They weren't, I think they adore Washington post (they back up their statements with it a lot) and that's where I got the statistics from, I'm positive they aren't being sarcastic because it wouldn't be like them. Just pointing a few things out that's all.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised by these things at this point.

blah blah blah liberals blah blah blah media is evil

 

[Kaleidoscopes]

More like that face when you are incapable of contributing anything of real discussion value to a thread but you still want those internet greenies so you post memes and act like a child by typing "blah blah blah" over the post of the person you disagree with instead.

 

[Bowie]

For me, I just read random articles regardless of source (as well as forums and comments) and form an opinion.

This is your biggest problem.

 

[-Apples-]

This is your biggest problem.

What do you mean?

 

[Haskell]

This is your biggest problem.

Nothing's wrong with Apple2012...

 

[-Apples-]

More like that face when you are incapable of contributing anything of real discussion value to a thread but you still want those internet greenies so you post memes and act like a child by typing "blah blah blah" over the post of the person you disagree with instead.

Thank you. If you wanna know, I'm already finding more members on this site annoying. Six now, and not one of them is on my friends list. There were more, but a lot of those I have forgiven already since it's been like over a year since these incidents. I had to admit that I was rude when I said I had antipathy for those who believed Bush invaded Iraq for oil, but I didn't like that theory. Those who shame him for killing several people are being hypocritical because a couple of presidents have done that before, including those they honored. Abraham Lincoln did the same thing the same way Bush did, and unlike Bush, Lincoln had less heart. But Lincoln isn't evil. He emancipated the slaves. No matter who's the best and who's the worst, but they all did good things. Even Donald Trump despite being one week in office.

Now that the election of 2016 is over (and that Trump has taken office), it would be time for me to stop discussing politics in general. But I'll wait until the ACA is repealed.

 

[Ghost Soda]

More like that face when you are incapable of contributing anything of real discussion value to a thread but you still want those internet greenies so you post memes and act like a child by typing "blah blah blah" over the post of the person you disagree with instead.

Eh, each time I respond to Apple all they do is either ignore me or dance around everything I say. At this point, I don't even care anymore.

 

[Munyo]

What do you mean?

If you're going to form an opinion, be well informed about the issue.
I know you're very open-minded and willing to learn based on the things you post.
I was surprised you said that, but not very much at the same time.

You always bring up the Black Lives Matter into most political discussions (mostly out of nowhere). Reading most of your posts on it stresses me out a lot, but I don't really say anything about it. It's only because you refuse to try to see that racism occurs in patterns. In isolation, it's just that. But trying to see the real issue, the root issue, will make more sense as to why most people believe that Darren Wilson was guilty.

 

[Bowie]

What do you mean?

Well, you just said that you establish your opinions based on random articles, forum posts, and comments you find across the Internet, with no regard for their source. This is how people get misinformed.

 

[-Apples-]

If you're going to form an opinion, be well informed about the issue.
I know you're very open-minded and willing to learn based on the things you post.
I was surprised you said that, but not very much at the same time.

You always bring up the Black Lives Matter into most political discussions (mostly out of nowhere). Reading most of your posts on it stresses me out a lot, but I don't really say anything about it. It's only because you refuse to try to see that racism occurs in patterns. In isolation, it's just that. But trying to see the real issue, the root issue, will make more sense as to why most people believe that Darren Wilson was guilty.

Well, you just said that you establish your opinions based on random articles, forum posts, and comments you find across the Internet, with no regard for their source. This is how people get misinformed.

Thanks for telling me what I was doing wrong. I will accept your advice (both of you that is).

 

[unravel]

As if some people know what they are talking about but hey its interesting topic (salt) on ppl who talking none sense related to politics