Um, your math is a bit off there. Charging stations run about $20-30. Wii Remotes cost $40. If Nintendo were to release a Wii Remote with a built in rechargeable battery, it would probably cost $60+, given that the PS3 controller has a rechargeable battery and costs $15 more than a Wii Remote ($55) even though it has less technology in it. So, let's say $60 per Wii Remote at minimum. Buying three extra rechargeable Wii Remotes would cost you $180 plus tax, whereas buying three normal Wii Remotes and a charging station would only cost you $140-150.
Also, I'm talking in US Dollars, not British Pounds or whatever you were using. Same outcome, though, just with different numbers.
"given that the ps3 controller has a rechargeable battery and costs $15 more than a wii remote even though is has less technology in it"
"even though it has less technology in it"
"it has less technology in it"
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
this is what tye actually believes
in short, i think the only way a wii would honestly cost less than a ps3/xbox would be if you don't buy more than 3 controllers/nunchuks, and you don't use regular batteries.
also, on the topic of "it's common sense to use rechargeable batteries now because everything uses them", nintendo's handhelds have been using rechargeable since the GBA SP, as i'm sure you're aware.
http://shop.ebay.com/?_from=R40&_tr...echargeable+battery&_sacat=See-All-Categories
that is an off-branded game boy micro battery. i've bought a backup for my micro at about the same price, maybe less. a rechargeable battery would not cost exactly $20, and i'm sure that nintendo wouldn't lose many consumers, as now they have the plus of "the batteries are rechargeable!" like every other console has.
there is honestly no reason that nintendo should not have a rechargeable battery in the wii mote. the sync button could be placed differently, and they could have had a removable battery pack.
@ jason not being able to play the wii while charging, that comes with the wiimote's design, and that it's a motion-based controller. the ps3 is still a gaming controller at it's core, since it is shaped like the ps2/1 controller basically, so it's natural to have a wire to begin with. a wiimote with a wire coming out where the nunchuk plugs in would be awkward to play.. since you'd either need a really long charge cable, use little motion control, or face away from the tv/console. lol.
still, a charging dock and nintendo-branded rechargeable battery, EVEN IF IT WAS SOLD SEPARATELY, would not only save the consumer money in the end (say, one month down the road), but might even build nintendo a reputable fanbase.
oh wait. it's just a battery.
so why didn't they do it, if it's just a battery.
edit: and while you're off defending nintendo, would you care to explain why the nunchuk and wii remote were sold separately? cuz i mean.. i'm confused about that. seems kinda redundant to buy two controllers. meh.