Propaganda Man
Senior Member
Katz, I wasn't talking about this topic.
He also didn't have the right to kill all the people he killed..Bulerias said:As a pretty wise person once told me, "no man has the right to kill another", and I completely agree. No matter what he did, we had no right to kill him, at all. How are we better than him? We can't even dare to call ourselves better when we have blood on our hands as well. This nation is sickening...
He didn't, but who are we to judge him?ZERO_13 said:He also didn't have the right to kill all the people he killed..Bulerias said:As a pretty wise person once told me, "no man has the right to kill another", and I completely agree. No matter what he did, we had no right to kill him, at all. How are we better than him? We can't even dare to call ourselves better when we have blood on our hands as well. This nation is sickening...
I know we are "no-one" to judge him, but justice had to be served.Bulerias said:He didn't, but who are we to judge him?ZERO_13 said:He also didn't have the right to kill all the people he killed..Bulerias said:As a pretty wise person once told me, "no man has the right to kill another", and I completely agree. No matter what he did, we had no right to kill him, at all. How are we better than him? We can't even dare to call ourselves better when we have blood on our hands as well. This nation is sickening...
i said that in msn half an hour ago to you.Bulerias said:As a pretty wise person once told me, "no man has the right to kill another", and I completely agree. No matter what he did, we had no right to kill him, at all. How are we better than him? We can't even dare to call ourselves better when we have blood on our hands as well. This nation is sickening...
He's not the first one who's had a death penalty..Acfan said:Although he deserved it, I am really against applying the death penalty. I mean, they could have sentenced him to life in the most maximum security prison ever.
That's a good point... "an eye for an eye, an arm for an arm" or something.ZERO_13 said:I know we are "no-one" to judge him, but justice had to be served.Bulerias said:He didn't, but who are we to judge him?ZERO_13 said:He also didn't have the right to kill all the people he killed..Bulerias said:As a pretty wise person once told me, "no man has the right to kill another", and I completely agree. No matter what he did, we had no right to kill him, at all. How are we better than him? We can't even dare to call ourselves better when we have blood on our hands as well. This nation is sickening...
I can't go around killing people and not paying for what I did can I?
I don't think that is always true. If you have someone who killed before, you have a right to kill him if he means to kill more. If killing someone is the only way to make sure they won't kill again, perhaps that is best.Bulerias said:As a pretty wise person once told me, "no man has the right to kill another", and I completely agree. No matter what he did, we had no right to kill him, at all. How are we better than him? We can't even dare to call ourselves better when we have blood on our hands as well. This nation is sickening...