The most interesting point I've seen so far in answers to Endless' questions was LaBelle's answer to the gun to the head question: Endless did this his first game here and he turned out to be scum, but hasn't done it in the other game(s?) I've played with him. Part of me thinks that the lack of enthusiasm LaBelle has in choosing Endless over anyone else is that she wants to begin a dialogue with him, or something.
Nah, it was sarcasm. I do want to keep Endless in the back of my head, though, because while he hasn?t done anything particularly scummy in my eyes yet, he is a very strong player & people tend to sheep him (good if he?s town, terrible if he?s mafia).
Is it just me, or is there quite a few people only using meta to formulate suspicions here? (Crys, Dolby, LaBelle, Ender (When Ender thought Dolby was sus because of offering NL and having been apart of 25 games, I consider that meta)). Kinda odd that it's being used so much in this game.
Um, I literally said the opposite of this? I said I didn?t support a lynch based on meta alone. Pls read. Guessing you assumed this based on my answer to Endless? question, so I?ll let it slide.
Glad someone got the ball rolling, but I can't support FOSing anyone based on meta alone.
tbh I'd really like to hear more from LaBelle regarding her matching Crystal's reads and alignment against Endless.
See above for alignment against Endless.
Crystal matched
my ?reads? (that were complete sarcasm). I posted before her.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Stick out tongue :p :p"
Anyways, I?m pretty suspicious of her right now.
Gun to your head, you had to Lynch 1 player off the nonexistent content so far, who do you Lynch? idk someone who hasnt posted anything.
Why bother answering the RQS if you?re not going to provide any useful information out of it?
to me, Dolby just seems like town trying to seem at the start if the game, its not worth my vote. Endless' play style reminds me how he played in bravely default mafia. I will probably vote for them unless something comes up.
Feels very much ?I don?t wanna vote Dolby, so here?s a weak reasoning on Endless and maybe people will jump on it."
All I was trying to say is that if Dolby was indeed mafia, I dont think they would try to start the game off so strong and bring attention to themselves. Something felt off about Endless so I tried to express it. Im not "going after" a stronger player I haven't even voted yet. I justed stated a small suspicion I had from the little information we get on day 1.
We?ve actually gotten quite a bit of information, more than enough for you to make an actual case if you so chose. Not having much information to make a case D1 is a totally invalid excuse.
I still wont have my comp for a day or two so I'll just cite like 2 examples. For one in both he started with random questions; this time with even more random questions. At the beginning of the that game and this one he went after strong players (Dad that game and Dolby this one) I know this is nothing but this just Day 1 and there's like nothing.
Again, this D1 has been very active - there?s more than enough information to make a case. I may have joked about RQS = scum for Endless, but that?s a completely stupid reason to suspect him IMO. I will consider your point about him going after strong targets as mafia, but again, I refuse to lynch someone based on meta alone, and I don?t think that?s enough to FOS him.
@Labelle Mind giving some reads on people?
See above for suspicions on Crystal. Soft town-reading Dad, Endless & you (SarasaKat) right now. On the fence for Ashtot, Enderwiggin, pillow bunny & Runeraider (mostly because I haven?t really had time to analyze their posts in detail and on my read-throughs nothing stuck out to me as particularly scummy).
Given the size of this game, I expect that it's standard town v. mafia, with maybe a survivor or fool role as the only third parties.
Anyway, as it is day 1 and we have the no lynch option, we have three options for today.
1. We lynch a player who has been proven to be a hinderence to the town because of inactivity or ineffectiveness in the end game. This as some benefits as we have a chance of reducing mafia KP while sacrificing little. The least overall risk.
2. We don't lynch anyone. The option with the least immediate risk, we don't reduce town's numbers but we leave in some potential mafia and ineffective players who will hinder us towards the end of the game.
3. Yolo, and try to take out the strongest mafia possible. Most risky of the options. We lynch a player both strong (or mediocre) as town and mafia. We potentially lose a lot of value for the town but we have the potentially to kill strong scum. I've only seen this work in the most recent mafia. Extremely high risk, and I don't recommend it.
- - - Post Merge - - -
Anyway, two people i'd like to push forward for lynching today
Crys
Used to be Crystal, posts tend to lack substance unless propelled by being a lynch candidate. Weak gameplay in general
Ashtot
Potentially strong town, but is known for games with weak townplay and jokes.
Keep in mind that I haven't played tbt mafia in almost a year so things have probably changed quite a bit
So, Dolby. Looks as though your first post got you killed, mate. You got the ball rolling for sure, but why do all of your options include random/no lynch? How about, y?know, scum hunting? Were you expecting everyone to just jump on your meta bandwagon? This whole post is completely useless under the guise of being useful. I especially like the clause at the end. ?I haven?t played in a while, so excuse all my slip-ups please!?
@Dad
Not all my post was used to bait people, just option number 3 on my list. I'm serious with the proposal of no lynching (although it's not really the best option I agree, but on day 1 there really aren't any good things to do, and random lynching would give us more information for day 2). As for the Ashtot and Crys suspicions, they we're just a attempt to get the game started (because my post was the only serious post in the game at that point, so I had only meta to go off of) as I only had past experience to go off of at that point. I started to be serious with the prospect of an Ashtot lynch because he was just spamming before I went offline, which isn't suspicious in itself, but it tends to lead to him having poor gameplay and just being a distraction towards the endgame (I shot him for that in bird mafia 2), I'm glad that he's taking this game somewhat seriously now.
So posting to get the game going.
At this point, if I had to vote for someone, I would probably vote for one of the non-posters or pillow bunny because of their short, mostly non-contributive posts, getting a few scum vibes from Crys, the mafia would want to try to lynch a strong player who'll be protected early on.
Decent defence, but ugh ugh ugh. Random/no lynching when scum hunting is an option is just no.
@Dad, when I left my third post I was counting Tom with the non-posters because he had only posted once before (the questions that Endless posted) and I kind of forgot that he had posted. I'm getting red flags from Tom and pillow bunny for their yolo votes, I'm getting town reads EnderWiggen, and SarasaKat. I'm leaning town towards Dad, and neutral towards Endless, and crys. Runeraider i'm getting third party reads from. Everyone else I don't have enough to go from because they've posted once or less. I don't have much time because Ap bio and calculus, so sorry for short post.
Thanks for the reads, but you still haven?t really made a proper case for anyone. You?ve just been throwing out names.
I?d prefer to vote for Crystal, since I think the case on her is much stronger than the case for Dolby, but I think the case on Dolby is good enough to support a lynch for him, and it looks like that's the way the lynch is going to go, so that?s who my vote is going to.