Spam Question

[Ryudo Dragoon]

If you posts actually include a subject, predicate, and a complete thought, then your chances of being warned go down significantly...

Saying "Rolling on the floor laughing" isn't any better than "ROTFL."

You could easily press a few more keys on your keyboard and say this:

"Haha! That was really funny! Do you have any more jokes or whatever like that?"

See? Elaborating just a little bit adds a lot.

But it's so unnecessary, why bother saying the same thing but with more words than needed. *-*

 

[Mickey]

If you posts actually include a subject, predicate, and a complete thought, then your chances of being warned go down significantly...

Saying "Rolling on the floor laughing" isn't any better than "ROTFL."

You could easily press a few more keys on your keyboard and say this:

"Haha! That was really funny! Do you have any more jokes or whatever like that?"

See? Elaborating just a little bit adds a lot.

I couldn't have explained it any better.

 

[dragonflamez]

If you posts actually include a subject, predicate, and a complete thought, then your chances of being warned go down significantly...

Saying "Rolling on the floor laughing" isn't any better than "ROTFL."

You could easily press a few more keys on your keyboard and say this:

"Haha! That was really funny! Do you have any more jokes or whatever like that?"

See? Elaborating just a little bit adds a lot.

But it's so unnecessary, why bother saying the same thing but with more words than needed. *-*

Then don't post at all.

 

[Ryudo Dragoon]

If you posts actually include a subject, predicate, and a complete thought, then your chances of being warned go down significantly...

Saying "Rolling on the floor laughing" isn't any better than "ROTFL."

You could easily press a few more keys on your keyboard and say this:

"Haha! That was really funny! Do you have any more jokes or whatever like that?"

See? Elaborating just a little bit adds a lot.

But it's so unnecessary, why bother saying the same thing but with more words than needed. *-*

Then don't post at all.

But then there'd be nothing at all, there are differences between a comment and a debate. :l

 

[Mickey]

If you posts actually include a subject, predicate, and a complete thought, then your chances of being warned go down significantly...

Saying "Rolling on the floor laughing" isn't any better than "ROTFL."

You could easily press a few more keys on your keyboard and say this:

"Haha! That was really funny! Do you have any more jokes or whatever like that?"

See? Elaborating just a little bit adds a lot.

But it's so unnecessary, why bother saying the same thing but with more words than needed. *-*

Then don't post at all.

But then there'd be nothing at all, there are differences between a comment and a debate. :l

There's also a difference between an actual intellectual post and spam. People would prefer Intellectual Posts where it matters. If you want to spam or 'comment' freely, then go to 'Brewster's Cafe'.

 

[Propaganda Man]

I was told that questions pertaining rules should be messaged to the staff.

Storm? Why isn't this locked?