• Guest, you're invited to help build our new TBT time capsule! It contains three parts, with some of its elements planned to open in 2029 and others not until the distant future of 2034. Get started in 2024 Community Time Capsule: Blueprints.

Mafia Super Smash Brothers: Mafia! - Volume 2 - Mafia Win

Not bad zendel, thats really good effort on day 1
and I'm sorry if I hurt ur feelings, I've been really harsh to u and I feel bad. Seems like we won't be needing to do a policy I don't think so I'll completely drop the idea (Although, I wasn't really expecting my one sentence about it to blow up like it did, I wasn't even encouraging a policy lynch)


(I definitely town read you instead of null after all that)
 
Sensai - There's been a noticeable difference in gameplay and attitude, he's less active and he hasn't really made too many posts about anyone besides me, lol.



The tone has changed a bit and I would like to see more from you hence why I highlighted that part.

I'm less active because I have things to do and responsibilities to take care of. Besides the point, I'm gonna sit and do a proper read when I get the chance.
 
ftr, Zendel's read on me is pretty trashy imo. I'm gonna get into it rn so i might disapeer a little.
 
Considering the themeless Mafia was my first time playing, I'm not so sure it's the best source to go off, Zendel, but I suppose it's all anyone has.

I'm still suspicious of Dolby for Town-reading me so early, and the same for Kat, really. I can't help but feel like they've both tried to get people talking about me, and even if what they're saying is beneficial to me, it gets me in people's minds either way, and suspicion is bound to blossom from that from someone.

There's not much else I can elaborate on regarding that. Kirby waited until I voted Dolby, though, so I'm also thinking that they just wanted to jump on the bandwagon of anyone voting for a Townie, which would decimate my initial thoughts on Dolby.
 
Considering the themeless Mafia was my first time playing, I'm not so sure it's the best source to go off, Zendel, but I suppose it's all anyone has.

I'm still suspicious of Dolby for Town-reading me so early, and the same for Kat, really. I can't help but feel like they've both tried to get people talking about me, and even if what they're saying is beneficial to me, it gets me in people's minds either way, and suspicion is bound to blossom from that from someone.

There's not much else I can elaborate on regarding that. Kirby waited until I voted Dolby, though, so I'm also thinking that they just wanted to jump on the bandwagon of anyone voting for a Townie, which would decimate my initial thoughts on Dolby.

Then why would Kat "crap her pants" if you were mafia? It doesn't make sense, so I'm going to forward that question to her again; Why would you crap your pants if Bowie was mafia Kat?

It's the only source to go off but I can see the similarities from the other game, that's why I suggested that people should investigate for themselves as I may be getting the wrong end of the stick from that game.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Also Evan can you provide any games from your the site that you usually play mafia on? I'm interested to see what you were like as both town and mafia. :)

Thank you.

- - - Post Merge - - -

"from your the site"

What am I?

- - - Post Merge - - -

That was meant to say "from the site that you...."

oops. :rolleyes:
 
Crys - I feel like there isn't enough, none of her posts come across as townie or scum. She called people out for sussing Bowie and Dolby, and the lack of free thinking yet the only people she has questioned so far would be those who are sussed, those people being me and Bowie. This doesn't mean she susses either of us but why would she question people if she don't sus them, so she most likely does. lol. Free thinking is over tbh.
are you like dumb. no offense but this post made me really irritated for some reason. In all honesty I think all of Zendel's read are just fluff. His paragraphs to me seem like they have no substance, or they are restating things that have been said before.

Ill explain what I didn't like about his read on me. Zendel thinks that you can't question people unless you are most likely suspicious of them. LOL. By this logic everybody in this thread having Dialogue's and questioning eachother, they are all also most likely suspicious of eachother, by Zendel's flawed logic. I don't appreciate that Zendel had made an assumption that I am sus of the people I HAVE questioned; notably Bowie and Dolby, when I had said that I think they are both Town like did you completely skip over that post or is it willfull ignorance, which I believe I saw from you yesterday too. So yeah I'm just clearing up that don't neccasry sus everybody that I question, and that it was wrong of Zendel to make that assumption. idk im just rambling at this point i think, its whatevs.

@Zendel why is your read on mog so pleasant, I believe she made a few posts about "avoid lynches of good players" or something like that. Don't you have anything specific to tell her at all? Interesting...




Anyway I am not gonna vote for Kirby, I think he seems the same as always. I don't get surpised when Kirby does 180s on people that is always what he does. It feels like once every game someone gets a sus on kirby and I think Kirby tries to fix it but when he does, it just makes the problem worse and people more suspicious. It's like a sinking submarine lol.



Bowie
glow
Dolby3
amazonevan19
Heyden

Kirbystarship
Arstotzkan
xCleb
SensaiGallade
Endless


Jacob
KermitTea
mogyay
Zendal


Green= Acting Townish
Red = Acting Scumish

The red and the green are in no order but the bold Name, the closer they are to the green/red is like the more I think what their alignment could be, like for red for example Sensai and Endless, there is some slight nuances? i think that make me feel a little unsure of them and in the reverse Kirby makes me think he probably town. I guess Cleb who's right in the middle is the only one you could really consider null.

*btw im gonna vote karen probably
 
When people say you're acting uncharacteristic even after you post about changing your play-style during pre-game. :lemon:

I haven't posted much and maybe I should work on that. I don't understand why my different posting style is a good argument though.
 
Ftr2 zendel gave Karen a slight town read when she's done nothing, citing that their confusion is relatable. I find that really such an interesting town read, because it's not like mafia can't play dumb. I find all the MORE interesting that Karen was lowkey defending Zendel earlier.

I'm gonna go to work now and won't be here for 6 more hours.
 
Also Evan can you provide any games from your the site that you usually play mafia on? I'm interested to see what you were like as both town and mafia. :)

Thank you.

Sure thing, I'll give you just a couple examples of each alignment.

Games where I was good:
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=14217
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=14474
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=13120 (I think this was my first online mafia game ever)
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=15476

A game where I am neutral:
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=15832 (ongoing game)

Games where I was mafia:
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=14309
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=14858

(My username there is Evan JSYK)

- - - Post Merge - - -

Damn you TBT!! All I wanted to say was that my older username on that site was ParadigmPWNS but you had me post twice instead :mad:
 
Last edited:
Sure thing, I'll give you just a couple examples of each alignment.

Games where I was good:
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=14217
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=14474
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=13120 (I think this was my first online mafia game ever)
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=15476

A game where I am neutral:
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=15832 (ongoing game)

Games where I was mafia:
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=14309
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=14858

(My username there is Evan JSYK)

- - - Post Merge - - -

Damn you TBT!! All I wanted to say was that my older username on that site was ParadigmPWNS but you had me post twice instead :mad:

Do not edit your posts again. This is your final warning.
 
are you like dumb. no offense but this post made me really irritated for some reason. In all honesty I think all of Zendel's read are just fluff. His paragraphs to me seem like they have no substance, or they are restating things that have been said before.

Ill explain what I didn't like about his read on me. Zendel thinks that you can't question people unless you are most likely suspicious of them. LOL. By this logic everybody in this thread having Dialogue's and questioning eachother, they are all also most likely suspicious of eachother, by Zendel's flawed logic. I don't appreciate that Zendel had made an assumption that I am sus of the people I HAVE questioned; notably Bowie and Dolby, when I had said that I think they are both Town like did you completely skip over that post or is it willfull ignorance, which I believe I saw from you yesterday too. So yeah I'm just clearing up that don't neccasry sus everybody that I question, and that it was wrong of Zendel to make that assumption. idk im just rambling at this point i think, its whatevs.

@Zendel why is your read on mog so pleasant, I believe she made a few posts about "avoid lynches of good players" or something like that. Don't you have anything specific to tell her at all? Interesting...

1. Okay, no I don't. I think asking people general questions like "Who are your lynch candidates" are fine and don't come across as pushy (like you) in any way nor do they indicate that you are suspicious of them.

2. I stated that pushing Bowie and I didn't mean you sussed us. I said "why would you question us if you didn't sus us", when I meant to say was: "why would she question us in that way (pushy) if she didn't sus us, so she most likely does. lol."

3. I didn't assume anything, I proposed an idea which isn't an assumption.

4. What does that question mean, I haven't seen Mog say anything like that. I also don't know what you mean by "Don't you have anything specific to tell her?"


Eh.
 
I don't get why editing for typos and double posts is so frowned upon. I get why you can't edit to change what you're saying in the game, but I'm clearly just changing minor (or major) typos.

Whatever, guess I'll just keep my atrociously ugly posts ugly in the future so I won't be banned. :rolleyes:
 
Sure thing, I'll give you just a couple examples of each alignment.

Games where I was good:
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=14217
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=14474
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=13120 (I think this was my first online mafia game ever)
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=15476

A game where I am neutral:
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=15832 (ongoing game)

Games where I was mafia:
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=14309
http://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=14858

(My username there is Evan JSYK)

- - - Post Merge - - -

Damn you TBT!! All I wanted to say was that my older username on that site was ParadigmPWNS but you had me post twice instead :mad:

Thank you.

- - - Post Merge - - -

When people say you're acting uncharacteristic even after you post about changing your play-style during pre-game. :lemon:

I haven't posted much and maybe I should work on that. I don't understand why my different posting style is a good argument though.

So pulling "OMGUS" is part of your new playstyle? Got it.
 
i read that as jacob being a suck up tbh but maybe that's too harsh cause like i do see his point but i think everyone understands the stupidity of (mostly meaninglessly lynching really strong players, like why spell it out like that i guess?
@zendel, this post here. Mog said something that sounded like " we shouldn't lynch good players day 1 (meaninglessly)" since you had a little rant about that I thought you might have something more specific to say to her. I guess not.

1. Okay, no I don't. I think asking people general questions like "Who are your lynch candidates" are fine and don't come across as pushy (like you) in any way nor do they indicate that you are suspicious of them.

2. I stated that pushing Bowie and I didn't mean you sussed us. I said "why would you question us if you didn't sus us", when I meant to say was: "why would she question us in that way (pushy) if she didn't sus us, so she most likely does. lol."

3. I didn't assume anything, I proposed an idea which isn't an assumption.

4. What does that question mean, I haven't seen Mog say anything like that. I also don't know what you mean by "Don't you have anything specific to tell her?"


Eh.
3. so the statement " f111 most likely is suspicious of those she's (pushy with when) questioning is an idea and Not an assumption, LOL.
 
Just read back, 100% agreed on the towncrack.

Also considering people pointed it out, my reason for my Bowie read earlier: scum, esp newer scum dont have the confidence to refer to their role from my experience. It feels like something he'd say in maf chat, and I dont think thats a reaction one of the "godfathers" would think to tell him to do.

Only got a min left before break ends, gonna reread jacob

- - - Post Merge - - -

Reread on next break*
@Zendel I believe this answers your question? Ofc he could be mafia talking about his role but I just don't think it's likely, just like how I don't think it's likely evan would post the way he did when defending himself against Heyden. And since then, I just haven't seen his posts as scummy so my read has stayed. Could be confirmation bias here but I'd be shocked if Bowie was scum here.

Just got home so trying to formulate thoughts atm. Something's bothering me about crys tbh but idk what it is yet

- - - Post Merge - - -

To be fair I think Cleb's got a point. He's not saying people are sus just because they're sussing him, but because of something that he stated was gonna be a thing. Its like if people were sus of Heyden and I on Saturday bc we prob won't be on even though we both said that we're gonna be doing the splatfest.
 
So pulling "OMGUS" is part of your new playstyle? Got it.

supa-hot-fire.gif
 
@zendel, this post here. Mog said something that sounded like " we shouldn't lynch good players day 1 (meaninglessly)" since you had a little rant about that I thought you might have something more specific to say to her. I guess not.

3. so the statement " f111 most likely is suspicious of those she's (pushy with when) questioning is an idea and Not an assumption, LOL.

She also said:

yeah i agree! they should never be immune, i disagree with jaocb completely however i think there are more repercussions mislynching a really strong town player. however that might be totally flawed of me to think idk

I'm pretty sure that she believes policy lynching anyone is terrible and she also believes that better players should never be immune to it, unless I read this wrong...Hope I didn't. :(



"This doesn't mean she susses either of us, but why would she question people in that way (pushy) if she don't sus them, so she most likely does. lol."

Is what I meant to say and the part I highlighted isn't an assumption it is a suggestion/I proposed the idea (would it help if I put a question mark there?) that you actually sussed us and fyi I didn't see you mention town reading Bowie, so that's my mistake but you do scum read me sooo.....
 
post glitch

- - - Post Merge - - -

@Crys why lynch Karen over Zendel if Zendel's higher on your sus list?

and now to retype my last post thanks tbt best website

I think Cleb's got a point though (or at the least it isn't OMGUS). OMGUS is saying people are suspicious just for saying you're suspicious, while he's saying its odd that people are sussing him for a change in playstyle when he said he'd do it pregame. It's like people being sus of Heyden/me on Saturday when we prob wont be posting bc of Splatfest, even though we both mentioned it pregame.
 
Back
Top