There's been so much doubt cast on the situation that those votes are by no means set in stone though. Things could change as quickly as they did D1.He has four votes on him.
There's been so much doubt cast on the situation that those votes are by no means set in stone though. Things could change as quickly as they did D1.He has four votes on him.
Would you perfer Uttu or Apple, and why?how many times do i have to say it ? im not against an Apple lynch.
Pretty sure the answer to your question is only like a page or two back. Panda's been tunneling Uttumori hard Today, though.Would you perfer Uttu or Apple, and why?
Ah gotcha. You using 40/page or whatever the standard tbt is for reference?Pretty sure the answer to your question is only like a page or two back. Panda's been tunneling Uttumori hard Today, though.
Ah gotcha. You using 40/page or whatever the standard tbt is for reference?
This feels like a very awkward post. It doesn't have any actual pressure to it, like you'd think someone would have in a post responding to someone completely avoiding your questions. It almost feels like a "hey, you need to get your Scum-Leans out there or else you're gonna end up lynched" kind of deal, and makes me believe that if Uttumori is Mafia, so is Panda.
-snip-
What about Uttumori, then? Do you think Panda and Uttumori could be a team based on their nearly parallel agendas?
-snip-
Based on what I've caught up on, my top Mafia-Leans are currently Uttumori and Panda, with a lesser Lean on Apple. I hold a strong belief that Uttumori and Panda are a team based on their actions Today (and their very strange interactions from earlier)
Apple's claim in #1323 puts a big wrench into things for Today...I wonder if Byngo lied about there being an Oracle report at all to try and get lynched before she got screwed over? Not a huge chance for that, but it's something to think about, since I'm not convinced there's an Oracle AND a Detective. It's a tough call to make, honestly, but I don't want to back off just because Apple is a role that could find Mafia more easily than anybody else.
Would you perfer Uttu or Apple, and why?
@panda: the thing that is literally getting apple lynched rn is how he read strongman. you read it the same way but you said he's still scummy. how so?
also @others: i don't see how wouldn't hesitate to vote for trundle given he's un cc'd detective. it goes back to my question of whether mafia have PR safe claims.
No counterclaims =/= Apple is confirmed Detective. Detective could just not exist, and with there being a likely Oracle, Apple could have gotten a lucky guess with his claim, knowing that Oracle was in the game.also @others: i don't see how wouldn't hesitate to vote for trundle given he's un cc'd detective. it goes back to my question of whether mafia have PR safe claims.
@Kat - I have it at 20/Page right now.
@Seroja - Maybe we're just looking at it in different manners, then. The "APPARENTLY" quote really struck me as very coach-like, though I don't understand why that would be made so blatantly obvious.
No, I'm saying that Apple shouldn't be scrutinized any less just because he claims a role that will force people to question themselves and potentially remove their votes. I haven't voted yet, and so far I haven't seen any new info come up. I'll likely vote for Apple closer to EoD, but we already have 6(?) on him right now, so I'm not going to do anything with my vote just yet.
@panda: the thing that is literally getting apple lynched rn is how he read strongman. you read it the same way but you said he's still scummy. how so?
also @others: i don't see how wouldn't hesitate to vote for trundle given he's un cc'd detective. it goes back to my question of whether mafia have PR safe claims.
No counterclaims =/= Apple is confirmed Detective. Detective could just not exist, and with there being a likely Oracle, Apple could have gotten a lucky guess with his claim, knowing that Oracle was in the game.
THERE ARE NO SAFE CLAIMS. ALL THE POSSIBLE CLAIMS ARE IN THE SECOND POST WITH THE ROLES.
If there were safe claims, we'd see multiple instances of the Vigilante role description, in which there are two possible names for it. That isn't the case, so if somebody claims something that the name isn't in the role list, they're lying.
So basically if someone claims a name that isn't in the second post, it's 100% a safe claim?i know that
for me this game: safe claim == role(name) listed on possible list of roles that doesn't exist.