☆ Bandwagons ☆
Justin brought up a good point about the Day 2 bandwagoning - not only on
BlueLeaf, but his point is also valid for the early part of the day too.
The first section of my largest post on Day 2 (
here) is something I could have posted a good eight hours earlier than I actually did. I withheld on making my point about
DarkNightMoon on purpose to see who would jump on
Trundle's case against her. Results? Not including
Trundle, the following names are the people who considered
Trundle's evidence against
DNM valid and most likely would have been happy to lynch her based on
Trundle's case alone; the coloured names are those who went as far as voting for
DNM:
- Bellbringergreen
- BlueLeaf
- Justin
- Zr388
- Tom
- ACNL Noodle
- Karen
- Syd
- Jeremy
Please correct me if I missed anyone.
☆ Karen made comments in the thread and later withdrew her vote.
☆ Syd blindly imitated
Karen without contributing to the discussion: both with voting and unvoting.
☆ Jeremy didn't contribute to the discussion. Just voted.
Now, compare this with the list of names
Justin called out for jumping on the
BlueLeaf bandwagon (votes alone):
- Jeremy
- ITookYourWaffles
- Cory
- Zr388
- Kit
- Trundle
Two overlaps between the lists here.
Jeremy and
Zr388 - but
Zr388 didn't go as far as voting for
DNM.
Between (a)
Jeremy's voting habits and (b) the evidence provided by
oath2order, I think the case against
Jeremy is currently the most solid - especially the remark about
iLoveYou's comment on his visitor wall. I'm willing to unvote
BlueLeaf (for now I'm satisfied with his responses to me and
Superpenguin; plus I'm not particularly happy voting for someone who can't be online today) but to be fair I'll withhold voting until we hear a defence from
Jeremy.