-
Guest, you're invited to help build our new TBT time capsule! It contains three parts, with some of its elements planned to open in 2029 and others not until the distant future of 2034. Get started in 2024 Community Time Capsule: Blueprints.
Mafia TBT Mafia XI: Person of Interest END
- Thread starter Trent the Paladin
- Start date
oath2order
#Porygon2024
The Cory thing is a joke, which Cory obviously took as a joke.
Okay, yeah, three to four words each time, because I'm on my phone. Yeah, okay, I shouldn't be on my phone at work, but it's better than being inactive and having Purpl start a lynch train on me.
Also, you seem to have taken out the quote that Purpl said
Or maybe an oath lynch?
Again, I was joking. Yes, I know I kind of got annoyed at Purpl for joking around in the current Mini Mafia. Either way, clearly Purpl took it as a joke.
Obvious information? Clearly it's not obvious information because it had to be pointed out to the newbies. Newbies, this isn't against you, but as town, lynching really is one of the few things we have to fight back against the nighttime kills. That's why we do a first day lynch. We lynch, and we base the game off that, seeing who is reluctant to jump on that first lynch, who defends who, who attacks who, who is over-eager to jump on the first lynch, etc, etc. That's why some of us are against the idea of a no lynch.
u need 2 stop
Continuing on oath's comment - I don't know if it was a mistake, or if you purposely took out that quote, @Dolby. Seems scummy, as if you were just trying to add more to your case of lynching oath, taking advantage of those who didn't read their little joke. I didn't even notice the removed quote at first.
I'm sorry, what do I need to stop?
All I've tried to do so far is help town and provide new players with information, and for no reason at all I've become the bad guy?
I'm one of the only players who have actually brought anything to the game so far.
It happens a lot. RL'ing is fairly common on day one. Also, Ashtot, you may've had the intention to help others, I think, but you bragged in your own informative post. It kind of set a scummy tone to the rest of the post.
I just wish you'd have a more optimistic view on things is all, I don't want to bash heads. Even Jenn pointed that out.
This really upsets me. There's been a ton of people that have provided great input on the game so far. :[
- - - Post Merge - - -
Alice speaks da troof.
Dolby presented a decent and well-thought out case, and you go "dude, the game's just started..."
Aren't we supposed to be sharing our suspicions? Just because the game has just started doesn't mean we should wait around before sharing our thoughts. Right? :U
As a third suspicion, Jeremy recently asked in staff chat if any of us were evil--while I went on about how silly of an idea that was to accuse me of such a thing, Justin was quiet before changing the subject.
:| SUSPICIOUS.
:| SUSPICIOUS.
oath2order
#Porygon2024
Quick thing.
Who are the two people that were mentioned as suspicions? Who are these two...people of interest?
Who are the two people that were mentioned as suspicions? Who are these two...people of interest?
Quick thing.
Who are the two people that were mentioned as suspicions? Who are these two...people of interest?
ccemuka was the first due to their post asking if Mafia could PM eachother.
Ashtot was second due to their defense of ccemuka despite several people finding it suspicious.
Justin is third due to my post above.
CrimsonFireWolf
Mayor of CroíRojo
hmm... i see that a lot people make wild claim to confuse the mass to get a guy to be murder by some dark & shade people
MrPicklez
Refined Trash
This whole thread is just one big cluster **** of confusion. I honestly don't even know what to say.
I just want to say that Jen is being too kind and that she is influencing players into a no lynch. This, I find is ridiculous. Every other game we lynch someone who is not super suspicious. No-lynching is a waste. Jen is also constantly moaning over the mean ness of the game. Do we want the new players to be like this? Are the rest of the scum team trying to get her to do no lynch so she sounds important? Well, I know we have a while, but let's think more, not just bandwagon, ok guys?
I'm pretty sure she only wants to do a no lynch because no one is listening to the handful of people who are saying no to random lynching, because it's too risky. Most agree that we should lynch one of the suspicions over the innocent. That's what most are bandwagon-ing on, I believe.
We must not go down the No Lynch path on day 1 for a multitude of reasons. The fact that it hinders progress has been mentioned several times, but also of note is that a SINGLE player casting a vote on someone would lead to that person dying if everyone else votes No Lynch. Too risky. We cannot take that gamble.
But I disagree with selecting a target at random - Instead, vote for the one you find most suspicious. Right now I find that Ashtot has a playstyle similar to last game in which he was Mafia. Likewise, Oath2Order played similarly when he was scum/ third party in the SuperNatural round. Keep an eye on those two.
But the safest choice might be to go for someone completely inactive. Once the 24 hour mark since game started is drawing near, we could VM the few who still has not posted anything. If they still fail to contribute to the game, I feel that they have been given a fair chance and that we should consider them as dead weight. Even if they are new. Because you are not trying to learn if you aren't participating anyways.
But I disagree with selecting a target at random - Instead, vote for the one you find most suspicious. Right now I find that Ashtot has a playstyle similar to last game in which he was Mafia. Likewise, Oath2Order played similarly when he was scum/ third party in the SuperNatural round. Keep an eye on those two.
But the safest choice might be to go for someone completely inactive. Once the 24 hour mark since game started is drawing near, we could VM the few who still has not posted anything. If they still fail to contribute to the game, I feel that they have been given a fair chance and that we should consider them as dead weight. Even if they are new. Because you are not trying to learn if you aren't participating anyways.
Or maybe Jen is just kind, and is trying to be understanding? This is just how Jen is, and I think it's even more rotten to lynch her just because you don't agree with her personality.
Morning.
First of all I'd like to say that I completely disagree with a no lynch. Jen, the more chances we miss to lynch someone and find a lead, the more chances we're giving scum to kill even more innocent townies and blues. :c Even if we go ahead and lynch someone who turns out to be innocent, we can see who hopped on the bandwagon and will have more leads to catching scum.
I agree with lynching an inactive (but giving people a chance to post), if we can't agree on a lynch for today. There's no point in wasting a day and not lynching anyone when there might be some who don't plan on contributing to the game anyway.
First of all I'd like to say that I completely disagree with a no lynch. Jen, the more chances we miss to lynch someone and find a lead, the more chances we're giving scum to kill even more innocent townies and blues. :c Even if we go ahead and lynch someone who turns out to be innocent, we can see who hopped on the bandwagon and will have more leads to catching scum.
I agree with lynching an inactive (but giving people a chance to post), if we can't agree on a lynch for today. There's no point in wasting a day and not lynching anyone when there might be some who don't plan on contributing to the game anyway.
If most people vote no lynch but a few people vote for a person, would the person still be lynched, or does the no lynch count as the 'most votes' for a person?
Depending on the answer to this question it suggests no lynch might be quite risky. Lynches and bandwagoning can also provide information on suspicious players as well, so it is probably worth the risk. I am currently wary of ccemuka because if their question on the mafia PMs - newbie mistake or mafia slip up? I'm not sure yet. Ashtot and oath2order are raising red flags to me as they have played similarly as scum before. Also a bit worried about what Jennifer brought up about Justin in the staff chat as he is yet to make a post, but I would like to see what he has to say.
There's also still a number of people who are yet to post (or yet to post something other than a 'hello I'm here' kind of post), but I'll give these people more time before I start bringing their names forward.
