• Guest, you're invited to help build our new TBT time capsule! It contains three parts, with some of its elements planned to open in 2029 and others not until the distant future of 2034. Get started in 2024 Community Time Capsule: Blueprints.

Mafia TBT Mafia XI: Person of Interest END

It's only the first day though. For all you know, this kind of behavior could be completely scaring them off. Maybe as the next day comes, they will feel a bit more chatty.
 
I personally don't think we should lynch anyone just yet as there are a lot of new people then maybe we should be given a bit more time to make our own choices about who to lynch as we will have picked up the game a little more and started to make our own suspicions and not just follow more experienced players descions
 
I am trying to forward who I think is suspicious, not sure why that is an issue. At least I have forwarded some names, all you've been doing is throwing your ego around and blindly defending anyone who has been brought up for discussion without posting your own thoughts. I also think you're being way too harsh on new players who are actually trying and making some good points, just because you have played more games doesn't necessarily make you a better player (not trying to be rude sorry :lemon:).

I'm sorry but you're pretty much just mocking me. I have 0 ego, and I'm not sure where you're getting this idea from. I'm trying to help, and that's precisely what I've been doing. I've brought up multiple names, and I've defend one person because people are making stupid accusations against him/jer. I'm not being harsh on any new player? My first post was all about helping them? Yes, just because one plays many games, doesn't mean they are a good player, but there is a group of players that are generally known to be helpful. If anybody here has an ego it's you.
 
Anyway I'm not voting yet because there's still plenty of day 1 left, and plenty of time for scum to slip up.
 
It's not like we can't change votes later either. But for now, unless something changes, I still feel No Lynch is best.
 
It's not like we can't change votes later either. But for now, unless something changes, I still feel No Lynch is best.

The majority seem to want a no lynch, so if this is the case, I'll be adding my vote if nothing new pops up after a while.
 
Since most people want no lynch I'll vote for that too. We'll see how this plays out~~
 
We're doing a no lynch because "it's not nice to lynch on day one"?

Other than the fact that I don't think I could roll my eyes any more than I already am, fine, it'd be pointless to try and convince you people otherwise.
 
I would like to put up a lynch candidate, Jennifer. For one thing she has said numerous times that she does not want to play the game and is just playing because Tom made her. It seems like she is trying to ruin the game for other people just because she does not want to play it. This is the sort of attitude I dislike. Also, it seems like she is able to easily manipulate new players, which is a majority of the players playing this game. If she is scum we will be in trouble because the new players will vote for whoever she votes for. In my opinion, we should not no lynch and we should vote for Jennifer because she does not even want to play and people will just be following her the whole game.
 
1. First of all Cory, you are a jerk.
2. Just because I don't want to play doesn't mean I'm not going to try to. I'm offended you think I'm trying to "ruin" the game. If I was, I wouldn't bother and would've been telling people to vote me out.
3. If you honestly think Tom could give me an evil role and live to post the game, you don't know me well enough. I would've kicked his butt.
 
Anyway I'm not voting yet because there's still plenty of day 1 left, and plenty of time for scum to slip up.

The majority seem to want a no lynch, so if this is the case, I'll be adding my vote if nothing new pops up after a while.

This is probably what I'll be doing later on. It could be something new since this never really happened before.
 
I would like to put up a lynch candidate, Jennifer. For one thing she has said numerous times that she does not want to play the game and is just playing because Tom made her. It seems like she is trying to ruin the game for other people just because she does not want to play it. This is the sort of attitude I dislike. Also, it seems like she is able to easily manipulate new players, which is a majority of the players playing this game. If she is scum we will be in trouble because the new players will vote for whoever she votes for. In my opinion, we should not no lynch and we should vote for Jennifer because she does not even want to play and people will just be following her the whole game.

But she is trying?? I may disagree with some things she's said but she is putting forth effort!
 
I mean, I've even responding pretty fast and reading the thread...

(My full response is at the bottom of 39 just as I know last posts on a page can be missed)
 
Jen I understand why you want a no lynch but I feel like you're providing an easy hiding spot for mafia.
I think all in favour of a no lynch should be looked at soon.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Especially those you'd be surprised to see voting for No Lynch
 
To all of you to considering the No Lynch option: Please reconsider and get rid of one of the completely inactive players instead. Once we hit the 24 hour mark in a few hours, everyone should have been able to have made a contribution to the thread, and it states in the rules that it's expected of you to spend approximately 30mins on the game per every 24 hour period. I've personally VMed/PMed several people who are currently ACTIVE on the forums and posting in a bunch of other threads, yet who still aren't replying here in the Mafia game. They could be scum, trying to just float by under the radar (it has happened many times before!), or they could be town but in that case they're completely dead weight. The following people have not posted yet:

The List:
Pofer.
River.
Justin.
smb3master.
Kippla.

Instead of voting No Lynch, pick the one out of these players you find the most suspicious (Check their forum activity in general and whatnot, so you know they've been online!) and cast your vote for that person instead. Else we'll never get anywhere.
 
I haven't been rude at all.If you didn't see yourself as rude, you would've said that to begin with so you obviously know you're rude to some degree. I don't see how you can't think randomly choosing someone to get rid of isn't rude. Here are people trying their best and you're just being super judgmental.

"almost" =/= always.

1. First of all Cory, you are a jerk.
2. Just because I don't want to play doesn't mean I'm not going to try to. I'm offended you think I'm trying to "ruin" the game. If I was, I wouldn't bother and would've been telling people to vote me out.
3. If you honestly think Tom could give me an evil role and live to post the game, you don't know me well enough. I would've kicked his butt.

You say that you haven't been rude then call me a jerk? Very hypocritical.
 
I'd still rather not see someone innocent get lynched with no proof. I know there's some cons, but I'd feel incredibly guilty if we lynched someone just under a "random pick" :/
 
Also Cory I don't think Jen is a good candidate to lynch. To me, this is just her playstyle. She's not being a disturbance or posting useless one liner posts.
 
Wow, Cory. You took a post I said BEFORE I posted you were a jerk to try and say I wasn't being rude.

Thus, that sentence can't be put to the one you're quoting later. You're being a jerk, rude, and a hypocrite in itself. Grow up.
 
Instead of voting No Lynch, pick the one out of these players you find the most suspicious (Check their forum activity in general and whatnot, so you know they've been online!) and cast your vote for that person instead. Else we'll never get anywhere.

No.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Modkills handle the inactives, not lynches.
 
Back
Top