• Guest, you're invited to help build our new TBT time capsule! It contains three parts, with some of its elements planned to open in 2029 and others not until the distant future of 2034. Get started in 2024 Community Time Capsule: Blueprints.

Mafia TBT Mafia XI: Person of Interest END

No.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Modkills handle the inactives, not lynches.

You obviously know that mod kills are hardly ever enforced properly or at the right time. You're playing extremely strangely this game so far. You've said barely anything and you're just agreeing with the majority instead of calling people out and forcing conversation. I'm watching you pigeon boy.
 
SP to be honest, I'm very surprised you're for a No Lynch. Could you please explain again why someone who always tries to lead lynches is voting No Lynch?

- - - Post Merge - - -

Also mod kills LOL whens the last time we've seen them consistently enforced?
 
SP to be honest, I'm very surprised you're for a No Lynch. Could you please explain again why someone who always tries to lead lynches is voting No Lynch?

- - - Post Merge - - -

Also mod kills LOL whens the last time we've seen them consistently enforced?

I'll modkill you right in the gob

Modkills will be enforced this game. :)
 
Well, let's just throw a name out. Who wants to lynch BellBringerGreen? Anyone.
There's no evidence ever on Day 1, so it's either a no lynch or a random lynch and people have already expressed distaste for a no lynch.

Ya'll would rage at me for picking a newbie, so I chose him (BellBringerGreen) randomly...hence the term random lynch.

Lynches are stupid, tbh. I don't understand why we continue to lynch people and have never actually done a no lynch in scenarios like this. This is just us reducing our own town numbers for the mafia. I'd like to vote No Lynch today.

Also want to point this out - You're kind of contradicting yourself..? Furthermore, this does NOT add up at all with your playstyle in previous games where you've been pushing for lynches on a various bunch of randomly selected targets (like me in my very first game, 15 minutes after it started, for no true reason other than my writing style..), and I have never seen you go for the No Lynch option as either Town or Mafia as far as I can remember.

Worse yet, you're really coming across as a "people pleaser" with your posts - Why do you always want to do what will make everyone else seem like you're the good guy? You're find with killing BellBringerGreen for no reason yesterday, but today we should not touch the inactives that might get modkilled anyways? I don't get it.

It's true that Tom will eventually modkill the inactives which is great, but until then they could be scum hiding in shadows, like Farobi did the previous two games he was in, causing us all kinds of trouble. Please explain why it's better to leave that risk in play rather than vote one of them out if they're not going to actively participate in the game either way? Like I said, some of them are on TBT right now, posting in other threads, but ignoring to reply to this one despite the fact that I PMed them.
 
1v1 ME TOM

- - - Post Merge - - -

SuperPenguin's "lynches are stupid" post gives me REALLY scummy vibes.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Also Sat I agree with the people pleaser thing. SP has never been for that in past games. He's always had his own strong opinions and he'd hardly ever follow the crowd in past games.
 
[13:39:26] <Tom29193> Tempted to post rocks fall and Pally dies
[13:39:31] <Tom29193> But what fun is that
[13:39:36] <Tom29193> Then I have to get a replacement
 
Also want to point this out - You're kind of contradicting yourself..? Furthermore, this does NOT add up at all with your playstyle in previous games where you've been pushing for lynches on a various bunch of randomly selected targets (like me in my very first game, 15 minutes after it started, for no true reason other than my writing style..), and I have never seen you go for the No Lynch option as either Town or Mafia as far as I can remember.

Worse yet, you're really coming across as a "people pleaser" with your posts - Why do you always want to do what will make everyone else seem like you're the good guy? You're find with killing BellBringerGreen for no reason yesterday, but today we should not touch the inactives that might get modkilled anyways? I don't get it.

It's true that Tom will eventually modkill the inactives which is great, but until then they could be scum hiding in shadows, like Farobi did the previous two games he was in, causing us all kinds of trouble. Please explain why it's better to leave that risk in play rather than vote one of them out if they're not going to actively participate in the game either way? Like I said, some of them are on TBT right now, posting in other threads, but ignoring to reply to this one despite the fact that I PMed them.

No Lynches > Sataric Leading Lynches

Hahaha 100% true ^
 
I'd like to hear from Pofer. They are one of the Top Ten posters and has posted literally nothing since the game started.
 
No Lynches > Sataric Leading Lynches

Hahaha 100% true ^

It is very true that I have made some mistakes in previous games (Sorry Kippla, I really thought you were scum!) and that I still lack some experience, but that doesn't explain the reasons and thoughts behind your actions. You're just ignoring my questions and trying to change the subject. I really don't want to argue with you again since it feels like we've been down that path several times before, and it just serves as a distraction which I do not want any part in - I have said enough, and I hope that you will either decide to explain your actions or that the people can see how contradicting and elusive you're being with your answers.
 
If it doesn't sound like bragging, Ashtot, then no one woud've agreed with me. If you can use what you've done in past games to your advantage, I can attack you based on past games. "Two scum kills based on luck", why was it even necessary to say that? Who gives a flying tuchus how lucky you are? It doesn't make me think you're any more town.

I'm not completely keen for wasting a lynch, we do have a few problem players and inactives that are just going to run to be modkilled. While, yes, it's not fair they don't have a say, it's only because they're not coming to the thread to defend themselves. We could be lucky, and hit inactive scum, but we could be slightly unlucky and hit green. Either way, there's no sense in voting for no one.
 
It is very true that I have made some mistakes in previous games (Sorry Kippla, I really thought you were scum!) and that I still lack some experience, but that doesn't explain the reasons and thoughts behind your actions. You're just ignoring my questions and trying to change the subject. I really don't want to argue with you again since it feels like we've been down that path several times before, and it just serves as a distraction which I do not want any part in - I have said enough, and I hope that you will either decide to explain your actions or that the people can see how contradicting and elusive you're being with your answers.

I still don't understand what your avatar is, btw.
 
I've been busy all weekend due to a festival in my area, going to catch up on reading today.

I'm not completely inactive fyi
 
Back
Top