Spotlight: Jeremy
So I'm going to take this hour before work to shine the spotlight on our friendly neighborhood Jeremy. He has come off as scum this entire game so far. Majority of Jeremy's posts have been "I agree with -". It makes him look like he's contributing, but he doesn't actually weigh in with any thoughts of his own.
Filler about KP, followed by repeating what everyone had previously said about Sataric.
Reposting his baseless Karla suspicion. Most of us had stated that Karla's behavior seemed strange, but didn't necessarily make him scum. I personally think Karla was upset (like I was) at being called scum by noob players based on "posting style". Honestly, even considering that Tina would allow a factional kill to be blocked would be ridiculous. I agree with Karla in thinking that Ryan is just dumb town (He has proven time and time again to be unreliable), so I have to wondering why Jeremy so readily went after Karla.
Jeremy continues to go after Karla, even attempting to provoke some rage out of him in the last sentence. I find that particularly scummy as arguments only serve to derail the thread.
The cherry on top - Karla asks Jeremy if he thinks he's scum and Jeremy immediately backs off with an "oh but it's only a suspicion!". To me this looks like someone that was chastised to stop poking Karla from another source. For a moderate suspicion, Jeremy seemed to stick to Karla like glue.
Repeating everyone else's reads on Crystal. Jeremy was the last player to actually vote for Crystal, even though the "evidence" he provided was her just being paranoid about third party? It's ironic that now we're actually considering what Crystal said when it was Jeremy's reason for voting for her. It also struck me as odd that he had been reading the thread and our suspicions, but only voted in the last 30 minutes of the day.
Jeremy was very vocally against killing a thief, even at the possibility of it benefiting town. He made ~5 posts solely dedicated to persuading the vig to not shoot a thief. He quickly flipped his opinion to be in favour of them dying (not by vig) and stopped defending them, which I found particularly odd. It appeared to me that he was drawing too much attention having the opposing opinion (much like accusing Karla) and backed down again.
He repeats what Tom, Dad and Karla stated about me. Notice a pattern? Jeremy attaches himself to the current target and basically just says "Yeah I agree" and slaps his vote on them. I feel like he's being far too wishy washy this game, he's not even trying to make a case on anyone. Everyone excused his silent behavior in the beginning of the game, but it's still lackluster. He accused me of playing it safe, but I get the same read from him.
In my eyes, Karen has contributed far more than Jeremy in the game so far. I don't think she can be fully trusted, but saying she hasn't posted any content as a reason to kill her when she has doesn't sit right with me. Alise has been posting more often as we have prodded her. Personally I don't get a really scummy vibe from her. I don't think I would call her inactive at this point in the game. I'm still undecided on Alice, so I won't comment on that part. This all just looks like weak arguments to push for people to get lynched.
Target switches fully to Karen - Jeremy agrees yet again without providing real reasons why other than her posting "simple observations".
Backpacking on Trundle and Tom on Yui Z.
I personally think Jeremy is scum. I think his behaviour changes from game to game and he doesn't have an incredibly predictable style. He puts forward weak arguments and suspicions on people, most of which are spoon fed to him by other players, but quickly backs off by saying "I merely said-" (as if that makes his previous post disappear). He has spent a majority of the game provoking Karla, who I find to be quite town at this point in the game. Every time a new name comes up as a topic, he immediately jumps on that person as well. His thief argument was wishy washy and he dropped that too. In my eyes, he has only been agreeable with other players, but backs off as soon as something becomes the unpopular opinion.
This is why I'm probably going to ##VOTE: Jeremy today.
So I'm going to take this hour before work to shine the spotlight on our friendly neighborhood Jeremy. He has come off as scum this entire game so far. Majority of Jeremy's posts have been "I agree with -". It makes him look like he's contributing, but he doesn't actually weigh in with any thoughts of his own.
My day 1 thoughts so far:
I wouldn't say kills are missing like a lot of you have said. We don't know what the KP is. It could be 1. Mafia had 1 KP throughout the whole game in Karla's Pleasure Cruise game. It could also be 1 just for Night 0. Who knows.
The one thing that stood out to me so far is when Sataric said he wouldn't kill Feloreena on night 0, but then oath posted examples of Sataric's strategy in past games where he wanted to kill Feloreena as soon as possible. So there's a bit of a contradiction there.
Filler about KP, followed by repeating what everyone had previously said about Sataric.
To add on to the Karla train, I was getting a funny feeling from him early in the day, before the role block development. It seemed like he was acting overly desperate and acting kind of awkward with his posts, repeating himself, etc.
http://www.belltreeforums.com/showt...he-Siren-s-Call-DAY-ONE&p=3705783#post3705783
http://www.belltreeforums.com/showt...he-Siren-s-Call-DAY-ONE&p=3705773#post3705773
http://www.belltreeforums.com/showt...he-Siren-s-Call-DAY-ONE&p=3705806#post3705806
http://www.belltreeforums.com/showt...he-Siren-s-Call-DAY-ONE&p=3705823#post3705823
http://www.belltreeforums.com/showt...he-Siren-s-Call-DAY-ONE&p=3707707#post3707707
I am still moderately suspicious of Karla and it's not because of the role block thing, which we've settled.
However, his attitude after ryan's vote was pretty interesting. On one hand he said, "I don't respond to most people who are suspicious of me, only when they proceed to make a terrible post." No one in this game considers ryan to be a strong player, and we all know that, and he was the only one who had voted for Karla at this point.
What appears to happen to Karla, though, is possibly... panic? When I read Karla's subsequent posts, it looks like he put far too much effort into reacting to a vote from someone who no one took seriously at the time (this was before ryan role claimed). It reminds me of how others have acted in the past, and I think even I've done it. Normally, it's nothing to panic about because the accuser probably won't gain support for the vote. But if you know that person is right, sure they may have made a lucky guess, but it makes you feel uneasy and overreact to it.
Even after everyone brushed aside the vote, he was still making trivial comments about it. I said "trivial" purposely because I think those are the type of posts that panic induces. I posted examples of what I'm talking about here: http://www.belltreeforums.com/showt...Call-DAY-ONE&p=3710884&viewfull=1#post3710884
Now if we end up lynching SP and he turns out to be mafia, I think that most likely clears Karla of being mafia (not sk obviously). Surely SP wouldn't so aggressively attack Karla as he did earlier if they were both mafia.
Reposting his baseless Karla suspicion. Most of us had stated that Karla's behavior seemed strange, but didn't necessarily make him scum. I personally think Karla was upset (like I was) at being called scum by noob players based on "posting style". Honestly, even considering that Tina would allow a factional kill to be blocked would be ridiculous. I agree with Karla in thinking that Ryan is just dumb town (He has proven time and time again to be unreliable), so I have to wondering why Jeremy so readily went after Karla.
It's not just about ryan, you acted overly sensitive about suspicion directed at you throughout the entire day yesterday. This post is completely unnecessary, for example:
http://www.belltreeforums.com/showt...he-Siren-s-Call-DAY-ONE&p=3705823#post3705823
Nobody was even suspicious of this. It's like you made a preemptive defense against nonexistence suspicions.
Maybe you're strategy right now is to show us that you always overreact when people talk about you, because look at you go now! Me oh my, you're off your rails!
Jeremy continues to go after Karla, even attempting to provoke some rage out of him in the last sentence. I find that particularly scummy as arguments only serve to derail the thread.
I've merely said that I have moderate suspicion of you. That's the best I can do on day 1.
The cherry on top - Karla asks Jeremy if he thinks he's scum and Jeremy immediately backs off with an "oh but it's only a suspicion!". To me this looks like someone that was chastised to stop poking Karla from another source. For a moderate suspicion, Jeremy seemed to stick to Karla like glue.
I am most suspicious of C r y s t a l and Karen right now. Both seem desperate with their posts.
For example, Karen made a long post about accusing town for messing up and not being smart about lynches, etc. However, she did not contribute anything to the game herself and ironically that very post she made was useless and was basically just a summary of what happened in the game so far.
C r y s t a l seemed overly paranoid about the third party thief roles and tried claiming thAT they might be mafia. Although that's possible, it just doesn't seem likely given the circumstances that they were claimed. And I don't see why anyone would think that so soon.
Repeating everyone else's reads on Crystal. Jeremy was the last player to actually vote for Crystal, even though the "evidence" he provided was her just being paranoid about third party? It's ironic that now we're actually considering what Crystal said when it was Jeremy's reason for voting for her. It also struck me as odd that he had been reading the thread and our suspicions, but only voted in the last 30 minutes of the day.
I think killing the thieves at this point is a bad idea and a complete waste of time. If you're really worried about it, we can wait until town numbers are dangerously close to losing majority. If the thieves do happen to be scum, we only need to lynch one and we will quickly find out that the rest of them are as well. But it's a bad move to attempt something like this at this stage in the game. Also, Karla, your general attitude is a distraction to our objective. Try cooperating with other players instead of acting smug all the time.
I think it's unlikely that they're scum and we'd be better off lynching unknowns and I think we should stay on the same track we're on. If we find out that one of them is scum, it really won't make a difference when it is since it would lead to us lynching all of them either way. But if we do it now, it will just continue to delay us.
I agree with this, but I'm still willing to give them the benefit of the doubt for the time being so we don't spend kills on them until we have to. At least if they are the mafia team, we are (in theory) safe waiting a bit since we only need one to find out who most or all of the team is. If they are mafia, I imagine it went down something like this: Natty decided to make the claim, but it was flawed. So then the other two scummates claimed to save her from looking suspicious. We'd have to believe that Natty was capable of making a mistake like that and dragging two scummates down with her, but I find that hard to believe.
I'm beginning to be persuaded. Besides, like I said in the last game, I'm sick of third party roles acting like all they have to do is claim and then they're safe for the rest of the game. If I were a vig, I wouldn't shoot them, but I don't know if I'll continue defending them.
Jeremy was very vocally against killing a thief, even at the possibility of it benefiting town. He made ~5 posts solely dedicated to persuading the vig to not shoot a thief. He quickly flipped his opinion to be in favour of them dying (not by vig) and stopped defending them, which I found particularly odd. It appeared to me that he was drawing too much attention having the opposing opinion (much like accusing Karla) and backed down again.
Meatloafs is certainly playing much less aggressive than she has in the past. Even as an important blue role in Majora Mafia, Mutton was aggressively arguing with me, which appeared to lead to her death. She appears to be trying to not ruffle feathers, which could possibly be a sign of scum playing it safe.
He repeats what Tom, Dad and Karla stated about me. Notice a pattern? Jeremy attaches himself to the current target and basically just says "Yeah I agree" and slaps his vote on them. I feel like he's being far too wishy washy this game, he's not even trying to make a case on anyone. Everyone excused his silent behavior in the beginning of the game, but it's still lackluster. He accused me of playing it safe, but I get the same read from him.
Why not Jello? Both Karen and Jello stick out to me as not contributing very much to town's overall goal. Karen claims she is, but her posts are simple observations.
alise isn't active, so I have no "scumreads" on her, but we can't let inactives slip by. I'm curious to know how everyone else wants to deal with her.
Fourthly, Alice seemed overly anti-Dad. Then when he died, she kind of just brushed it off. I'd be interested to hear more from Alice or what everyone else thinks about how's she's playing this game.
In my eyes, Karen has contributed far more than Jeremy in the game so far. I don't think she can be fully trusted, but saying she hasn't posted any content as a reason to kill her when she has doesn't sit right with me. Alise has been posting more often as we have prodded her. Personally I don't get a really scummy vibe from her. I don't think I would call her inactive at this point in the game. I'm still undecided on Alice, so I won't comment on that part. This all just looks like weak arguments to push for people to get lynched.
I agree that Karen looks scummy. She voted for Dolby even though he has a pretty convincing claim for being blue.
Target switches fully to Karen - Jeremy agrees yet again without providing real reasons why other than her posting "simple observations".
I'm really getting a funny feeling about Yui Z's post. There are people who have been up for question as possible scum recently, yet she said she is convinced that they are town. Big red flags here and if we find out either Karen or Yui Z are scum, it opens the door to a few others. Does anyone else share this feeling with me? I know Tom said basically the same thing abovr.
Backpacking on Trundle and Tom on Yui Z.
I personally think Jeremy is scum. I think his behaviour changes from game to game and he doesn't have an incredibly predictable style. He puts forward weak arguments and suspicions on people, most of which are spoon fed to him by other players, but quickly backs off by saying "I merely said-" (as if that makes his previous post disappear). He has spent a majority of the game provoking Karla, who I find to be quite town at this point in the game. Every time a new name comes up as a topic, he immediately jumps on that person as well. His thief argument was wishy washy and he dropped that too. In my eyes, he has only been agreeable with other players, but backs off as soon as something becomes the unpopular opinion.
This is why I'm probably going to ##VOTE: Jeremy today.