Mafia TBT Mini Mafia II: Catch Scum or Catch Scurvy [Game Over/Town Win]

[Blu Rose]

I feel like I should make advance plan for night 1
doctors- protect the strongest players
DT list- iLoveYou, Kuma, Trundle (if he is alive) and Gandalf
Vig list- not sure yet

Feel free to change it or whatever you want.

Oh? Who, in your opinion, are the strongest players, or, for that matter, anyone's opinion? I'm just wondering...
I think the Detective list is fairly accurate.
For the Vigilantes, I don't think they should shoot anybody--yet. They would just waste their shot, unless, by some miracle, it isn't Town.

Just throwing a name around... Lunatic.

Although she has made a significant three posts since the game starts, these are her three posts:

Spoiler: Lunatic's Posts this Game

You talk about finger pointing being suspicious (which I do agree with), yet you flip around and accuse people of being desperate? Interesting. c:

Also, how do we expect to get discussions for a lynch started on the first day, if no one brings any name to the table? At this stage of the game, throwing names out is a way to get people talking, to see if any possible slip ups are made.

She just contradicted herself. Saying, "No finger-pointing," then moving on to say, "We should finger-point."

Are you copying the reason I suspected you in the 4th mafia? o-o

So I decided that I'm simply not voting, as (like always) I'm not confident enough to vote for any name at this point. :x

#1stLynchisTheWorstLynch

This isn't really a reason to not vote. This is pretty much the same as voting placeholder, except doing a placeholder on a somewhat suspicious poster might at least help.

Despite her saying that she doesn't feel confident in voting, had she been given the chance, she would have voted for Mary last game, although, there is not really a bigger distraction this game...
She did share her opinion on SP last game, and she said so, as proved by the spoiler below.

Spoiler: Lunatic's Post from Last Game, against SP

Yes, in fact last night right before I went to bed, I was thinking to myself how it was strange that he dropped the argument and pointed out someone as a possible lynch candidate.

But, I found something else peculiar! The last hour (before posting this), I've been skimming through the election pages of TBT Mafia's 2 & 3, and I found he wasn't as aggressive during either of those elections. Yes, he did ask people why they voted, but he ended it there; He didn't continue to tell people their reasons were weak. Of course, one explanation for his behavior is that he's running for mayor, so naturally he'll question people's votes for another candidate?But wait! He posted this yesterday:

So some of you may think he just wants to get discussions started, and that's why he's being aggressive. I get that, but what I don't get is why he's even running for mayor? He said he doesn't give a **** if he's elected, and he said would continue tearing through posts wether he was running or not, so... I ask: Why are you running for mayor?

She pretty much ran to accuse SP last game, as a Town role, to get discussion going, I presume? Ah, whatever.

Then, in game III...

Spoiler: This other one

I did give reasons for my inactivity, if 3DSfan didn't see it. Basically it's because there wasn't/hasn't been a whole lot to post about. But by his logic, we should be suspecting VillagerDweller and Kerryelizibeth, because they haven't posted tons. By his own logic, he would be a suspect. Logic fail.

This finger pointing is starting to make me reconsider my vote.

Now, the finger-pointing is what you are encouraging, no?

Opinions, anyone?
Last time I made a big post like this against someone, it was the Doctor... Sorry ITYW!

 

[Superpenguin]

I decided to go with Stargazer out of the lurkers cause she is th eonly one looking at the thread, yet only to go vote without posting and vote on a bandwagon lynch.

 

[Elijo]

Okay, I really don't feel like Trundle is a good lynch. I just fear that he could be an important blue role who coincidentally and somewhat changed their style of post. I still feel like BBG is suspicious, but I am more than welcome to change my vote to a lurker (for example, Stargazer).

 

[Byngo]

Just throwing a name around... Lunatic.

Although she has made a significant three posts since the game starts, these are her three posts:

Spoiler: Lunatic's Posts this Game

She just contradicted herself. Saying, "No finger-pointing," then moving on to say, "We should finger-point."

Spoiler: Lunatic's Posts this Game

I hadn't realized how contradicting my post did look. Well, let me explain myself better: While I do find finger pointing suspicious, at this stage of the game, all you can do is finger point, because there is no evidence against any player at all, unless a mafia player is really stupid. Therefore, it's finger pointing later in the game that makes me suspicious of someone, not early on in the game.

Despite her saying that she doesn't feel confident in voting, had she been given the chance, she would have voted for Mary last game, although, there is not really a bigger distraction this game...

Oh? If I can remember correctly, I was just as confused for the first lynch of Mafia IV. I never voiced my thoughts of Mary publicly (or at least, that I can remember), so you're just assuming I would have voted for her. I wouldn't have, I would have just voted for myself as a placeholder because I wasn't convinced she was scum.

I fail to see what my post questioning SP has anything to do with this right now.

As for your last spoiler: That was my first mafia game, I hadn't read any prior mafia games, so more than anything the manner in which he pointed fingers aggravated me.

 

[Blu Rose]

I hadn't realized how contradicting my post did look. Well, let me explain myself better: While I do find finger pointing suspicious, at this stage of the game, all you can do is finger point, because there is no evidence against any player at all, unless a mafia player is really stupid. Therefore, it's finger pointing later in the game that makes me suspicious of someone, not early on in the game.
Okay.


Oh? If I can remember correctly, I was just as confused for the first lynch of Mafia IV. I never voiced my thoughts of Mary publicly (or at least, that I can remember), so you're just assuming I would have voted for her. I wouldn't have, I would have just voted for myself as a placeholder because I wasn't convinced she was scum.
Okay... Blu Rose is confuzzled.

I fail to see what my post questioning SP has anything to do with this right now.
Well, it's more that you shared your opinion, kind of challenging SP.

As for your last spoiler: That was my first mafia game, I hadn't read any prior mafia games, so more than anything the manner in which he pointed fingers aggravated me.
Oh, I guess it was. Sorry for the misunderstanding of the last spoiler... Game III was my first game, too, and I guess I blundered a lot there, too...

Okay then.

 

[iLoveYou]

I'd really like to see the following players post more:

Farobi (You are posting, but you really only post when you are called out)
Beary509 (started off by accusing others like me, Lunatic, Waffles - then disappeared)
Hikari (viewed the thread - never posted)
River (never viewed the thread - inactive)
FanousOnTheLoose (he has told several people in the IRC he would be away)

Feel free to join us during the Night / Day Two, since Day One is practically over. :/

- - - Post Merge - - -

The only reason I didn't include FireNinja1 is because he's viewing the thread right now. So he's probably going to post or something.

 

[Elijo]

FanousOnTheLoose (he has told several people in the IRC he would be away)

Yeah, he mentioned that he will be unable to post on Tuesdays and Thursdays. I believe it was because of work?

 

[Farobi]

I seriously have no opinion now. We have never seen StarGazer play before but other lynch candidates are just as unstable. Day 1 is such a mess as always. :c

 

[unravel]

Spoiler

iTookYourWaffles was the one who stressed that I get rolechecked. She was the first person to make a Detective list and put my name first. I left my name there because I really have no reason to remove it. I never insisted on being rolechecked, mostly because I am pretty sure the Mafia will want to take me out as soon as possible since I keep calling many players out. Chances are one of them has already been called out. If I get killed, what's the use of being inspected? I don't mind being inspected, but keep in mind I'm a target for Mafia too. Or, I should be their target.



If I took my name off the list, people would jump at me and say "omg she doesn't want to be inspected because she's hiding something". This is a very "damned if you do, damned if you don't" moment.

- - - Post Merge - - -



Like I said, I am very willing to vote for any player on the player list, if you really want to see another vote on Trundle then I will gladly help you achieve a strong player lynch for Day One. I love putting spotlight on the stronger players, as you all know from the previous game. We have no other leads and if this is what you want to see, then you have my support.

Sure why not?

I feel like I should make advance plan for night 1
doctors- protect the strongest players
DT list- iTYWiLoveYou, Kuma, Trundle (if he is alive) and Gandalf
Vig list- not sure yet

Feel free to change it or whatever you want.

I post about the contact thing when I didn't receive my roles yet huehue, but yeah feel free to investigate me. I wasn't stress or something I have to post that before I go to sleep.

Not so sure whether to vote StarGazer or not. For me it is not a good idea to lynch him/her on day one. I do not know what is s/he doing right now and plus s/he a new player.

Oh? Who, in your opinion, are the strongest players, or, for that matter, anyone's opinion? I'm just wondering...
If I'm gonna say it out loud it would be obvious.
I think the Detective list is fairly accurate.
For the Vigilantes, I don't think they should shoot anybody--yet. They would just waste their shot, unless, by some miracle, it isn't Town.
I guess so, well they shouldn't waste her action on someone (who we are not sure who is suspicious)

 

[Dolby]

Gonna vote bbg because he attacked new/weaker players, in my mind, that's a mafia trying to kill a innocent player and avoid himself or any other scrum getting lynched

 

[oath2order]

Oh hey, Dolby, your user title is the same as last game :O

 

[Dolby]

Oh hey, Dolby, your user title is the same as last game :O

I legitimately thought that non-commisioned officer sounded cool and wasn't trying to hint or fake hint a role, I still like and I'm gonna keep it until I find something that I think is better.

 

[oath2order]

I legitimately thought that non-commisioned officer sounded cool and wasn't trying to hint or fake hint a role, I still like and I'm gonna keep it until I find something that I think is better.

It's a joke omfg.

 

[Dolby]

It's a joke omfg.

In real life I take everything to seriously.

 

[BellGreen]

The difference is that BBG had his chance to say things and if he is actually a blue and going to get lynched, that's just poor playing on his part. People who have not had the chance to post yet have no say in this. It's like calling someone guilty in a court case who wasn't even there.

So it's pretty much the fact I'm not the best player.

What a reason, now give us the reason why we won't lynch you. I think you are innocent and please explain what Oath and Kuma post about you

You won't lynch me because you will realize that there are safer options besides me. Some of you ditched the idea of keeping stronger players in the spotlight. Like I said before, I was not trying to point fingers, I was just replying to them.

I'm just going with who I think is scum.

BBG I apologize if I'm wrong.

Unfortunately, you ARE wrong so I'll just leave it at that.

Gonna vote bbg because he attacked new/weaker players, in my mind, that's a mafia trying to kill a innocent player and avoid himself or any other scrum getting lynched

From reading that, I assume you think weaker players are innocent; not always the case. I am not trying to avoid anyone else's lynch besides mine.

If you guys want to play it safe and lynch me, go ahead. It doesn't seem like there are a lot of potential targets right now. I'll place my vote for Stargazer.

 

[Blu Rose]

So it's pretty much the fact I'm not the best player.

You won't lynch me because you will realize that there are safer options besides me. Some of you ditched the idea of keeping stronger players in the spotlight. Like I said before, I was not trying to point fingers, I was just replying to them.

Unfortunately, you ARE wrong so I'll just leave it at that.


From reading that, I assume you think weaker players are innocent; not always the case. I am not trying to avoid anyone else's lynch besides mine.

If you guys want to play it safe and lynch me, go ahead. It doesn't seem like there are a lot of potential targets right now. I'll place my vote for Stargazer.

There are six minites left.

 

[oath2order]

AND AT FIVE MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT THE WOULD'VE-BEEN DEAD MAN SPEAKS.

 

[Beary]

AND AT FIVE MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT THE WOULD'VE-BEEN DEAD MAN SPEAKS.

He was going to die? o.o

 

[BellGreen]

AND AT FIVE MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT THE WOULD'VE-BEEN DEAD MAN SPEAKS.

Sorry about that, I was really busy and it came up randomly. I wanted to reply to some of the posts directed to me.

 

[FireNinja1]

Requesting a 30 minute (or 1 hr) extension.