Mafia TBT Mini Mafia X: And Then There Were None (Game Over/Mafia Win)

Nah, I know. Alice would have said something, Sataric and SP were JUST here. ccemuka's been floating around and tbh Gandalf, Gallows, Okasan, haven't seen 'em. Nikki's usually during the day. At least Kiss SAID he was logging off.

Feloreena is playing I kind of forgot.

I'm half asleep here. Much apologies. That's 3 townies dead out of a possible 9.
 
I'm going to sleep so don't ask me questions until the morning.
 
I'm going to sleep so don't ask me questions until the morning.

I'll leave this for you then:

Why should anyone believe your claim? It's a pretty bold one if I do say so myself. Why would you claim? There's nothing to prove this, unless you've been hit, which means a vigilante has shot. If that's the case, then please tell us if you have been hit.

Besides, veteran could be a mafia role doubled up. It's entirely possible, since the Godfather in IRC mafia cannot be killed be shots, only lynched. While a veteran godfather would be a little OP, it's still entirely possible.
 
I'd like to hear more of this plan before I engage. And what Oath said is very true.

And if you see me viewing the thread all day it's because my computer died and I'm on my I pad.
 
I'd like to hear more of this plan before I engage. And what Oath said is very true.

And if you see me viewing the thread all day it's because my computer died and I'm on my I pad.

The plan is rather simple. We all clam to Cory, and Cory posts role disputes and the people that have refused to claim in the the thread before he dies. It's a pretty cheap strategy.

Role disputes are resolved by each side presenting proof of their claim.
 
The plan is rather simple. We all clam to Cory, and Cory posts role disputes and the people that have refused to claim in the the thread before he dies. It's a pretty cheap strategy.

Role disputes are resolved by each side presenting proof of their claim.

Except it's entirely possible that he's scum. In which case, what do we do then? It's not like Bird Mafia where if Natty was scum then oops the scum team has all the claims oh darn.
 
Except it's entirely possible that he's scum. In which case, what do we do then? It's not like Bird Mafia where if Natty was scum then oops the scum team has all the claims oh darn.

Maybe he should've asked a DT to investigate him. Oh well. If Cory is scum and we turn around and lynch him, mafia has what? 1kp? Slow pickin's from there.
 
Doesn't mafia already only have 1KP? Unless our doctor(s?) have been really good, it just looks like 1 KP / veteran hit.
 
Doesn't mafia already only have 1KP? Unless our doctor(s?) have been really good, it just looks like 1 KP / veteran hit.

I suppose so. It's pretty risk and reward this game. So I think we should put some thought into it.
 
Alrighty. I'd definitely want to hear from the rest of town that isn't you, me, Ashtot, Cory, or ccemuka (aka the only people talking right now).
 
You are the only ones talking right now because I was in bed.

Personally I don't think mass claiming to Cory is a good idea and I'm a little uneasy about how some players were pretty keen on doing it so early. True we haven't seen a counter claim, but following on from Karla's closed game, mass claiming is such a cheap tactic that I would rather avoid it in favour of a game that could turn out memorable. At this stage Im willing to believe Faloreena'a claim, all evidence suggests that there are multiple players with the same townie role. RIP Kaiaa aka Emily Brent. Also I don't find Sataric scummy. All I see is personal attacks that have been going on since his first game, what do you guys expect him to respond with. Im pretty sure it must be getting old for him but I can be proven wrong if he ends up red. The game isn't personal but a lot of the time people make it so without even realising.

On Superpenguin:

There wasn't much to say after that because it was obviously in our best interest to lynch one of those two.
I still find this pretty scummy. Yes it was in our best interest at the time to lynch one of the two, but why the hell did anyone go for someone who had a small chance of being a detective? Doesn't sit right with me. And on that note, Ashtot has been pretty keen to step up and defend Superpenguin every step of the way. He has talked about his own change in playstyle but is happy to point out that Superpenguin is playing differently to his normal scum behaviour. Why are you trying to stop us assuming that he could be playing a different game as scum than we have seen before? I don't know, but anyway:

Ashtot
Superpenguin
 
Y'know, I hate to keep doing this (not really since it's a Cory plan) but I'm starting to wonder if it's entirely possible for a blue role to only exist as a red and not as a blue.

Roles can be used once, more than once, or not at all.

The main post says absolutely nothing about the blues having to be town aligned. Now, yes, I understand that that does go against the entire meaning of blue roles, since they ARE listed as a blue, but I do think it's entirely possible for there to be a Mafia Doctor and not a Town Doctor, or a Mafia Veteran and not a Town Veteran.
 
No I have not been hit yet, but my behavior as blue is consistent of the last 3 games I have been blue I have been somewhat quiet. If I WAS scum and I claimed this I bet someone would counter claim. If this plan works out correctly town can win easily.
 
but my behavior as blue is consistent of the last 3 games I have been blue I have been somewhat quiet. If I WAS scum and I claimed this I bet someone would counter claim.

No. People change play styles. You play according to your allegiance and it's everyone else's job to determine who and what you are playing as. Telling us that your behaviour is consistent with previous 'blue' games tells me that you have put a considerable amount of thought into maintaining a style that you want us to pick up on, and that seems scummy to me. There is too much risk involved here + what oath said above.
 
No. People change play styles. You play according to your allegiance and it's everyone else's job to determine who and what you are playing as. Telling us that your behaviour is consistent with previous 'blue' games tells me that you have put a considerable amount of thought into maintaining a style that you want us to pick up on, and that seems scummy to me. There is too much risk involved here + what oath said above.

If you do not trust me it is okay, but I am just saying that I am vet because I will still be alive for a while since mafia only has 1kp.
 
Back
Top