Sorry for not speaking much for a while, and the length of this post - Been a long and busy day and me and
Feloreena has been out and unable to come online until now. I've just read through several pages of new posts. I think that there's pro's and con's to the "Cory plan" like others have already mentioned but
Oath really hit the nail on the head when he wrote the posts bringing up this bit:
How will we find out if Cory's mafia though? Let us assume Veteran Godfather with no town veteran. He leads us to lynch someone who claimed the same role. Let's say it's a townie role. Judging by the game, there are two sets of town aligned people that are on the same role. Just to be clear, it'll look like this, still assuming Vet. Godfather with no town vet.
Mafia Thomas Rogers and Townie Thomas Rogers
Townie Ethel Rogers and Townie Ethel Rogers
Townie Vera Claythorne and Townie Vera Claythorne
Townie Tony Marston and Townie Tony Marston
Seeing as it does seem possible for two people to both have the exact same name and role (It's not entirely confirmed but it's very likely!) I think we'll end up with a whole bunch of counter claims and even the roles that are unique would not be confirmed townies in this setup. It seems "High risk, low reward" to me and if the list would end up in the wrong hands it'd do us tons of harm. This whole game has a very oldschool vibe to it and honestly I think the best way forward is to simply mention who we find the most suspicious and then see if other people agree.
Professor Gallows should have been modkilled or replaced already in my opinion - But it is ultimately
Jeremy who decides that. Maybe he was not killed already because he's been talking in Mafia chat, and
Jeremy decided that was sufficient, but I doubt it.
There's certainly been some issues between me and
SuperPenguin in the past and perhaps I crossed the line earlier, but I truly do feel that is unfair and hypocritical how I've been treated compared to him. If I make a post that is slightly too long, it's "Fluff, a distraction, and I should be killed instantly regardless of town/scum alignment!" but when
SuperPenguin makes 25 posts about Potatoes that's perfectly okay? And when I call someone mentally unstable that's something to make a massive deal about, but when I'm called tons of insults far worse than that a few games back I don't recall many people speaking up to defend me. It's a very biased way of looking at things because most of you know
SuperPenguin better than me, and it's full of hypocrisy.
Anyways, people always say that "We cannot lynch
SuperPenguin - He's a strong player!" and this has been happening for many games in a row now. He's not afraid to say and do whatever he feels like when he's town, even when it doesn't make much sense to others. When he was scum last game, however, he pushed his aggressive behaviour a bit too far and got killed over it. We all know he's smart, and that he adapts his playstyle as needed. I bet he learned from those previous rounds and is now taking a much more laid back approach. If he just posts the bare minimum, nobody is going to want to lynch him, because he's "strong" and "valuable" - And therefore, I think he's playing the game excellently, but I also think he's Mafia. He's too different from his usual self to be town aligned, in my opinion.
So right now, I'm leaning on voting for either
Prof Gallows or
SuperPenguin.
