I don't really want to be categorised as 'jumping on the Forek bandwagon', but they say if it looks like a duck, acts like a duck and sounds like a duck, chances are it's a duck. I mean his arguments are very nonsensical (I know mine aren't amazing, but I don't contradict myself loads), he is constantly pointing fingers, and he has role-claimed really early on. It's day 1. Sure, extended day 1, but it's far too early to be doing that. Like I can't tell if that's also stupidity or if it's strategy, and he's playing the newbie card to conceal such. Plus if he were lynched, it would be a benefit to a lot of people, regardless of position. So my question to you Forek is, what are you contributing, or what can you contribute (rather than focusing on other people, and try not to mention your 'miller' role whilst doing so)?
My personal problem is still that I can't base my vote on how players have played in previous games, because I haven't been part of them and I would only be jumping onto another bandwagon, one that personally I don't understand and I won't be able to think through the thought processes that went into that game if I did read through them.
Tom is being quite...irritating though? I'm not a fan of tumblr-style GIFS and memes at the best of times, but they're not contributing to anything significant, and they keep making my tablet crash whilst I'm trying to read through XD.
Plus, the new members haven't contributed enough for me to assess them properly, so I'll keep an eye on what goes on tonight, and I'll start piecing together a first vote decision in the meantime!