The Villager Giveaway Thread!
- Thread starter ChaosKitten
- Start date
- Status
Wow, that is lucky. o3o I hate the tanning feature. ;_; Luckily I only turned orange once. ouo;Just FYI, I don't know if this was luck or what, but I TT'd exactly a year forward, because I wanted to lose my tan and grow some grass back, and no one left my town. And I TT all the time, I think you will be okay as cautious as you are being about it
And thank you! ;u; I really hope it works. This will be my first time.
On the search for Lobo/Chief as my town cranky and Peanut/Flora as my second peppy if anyone has them
Didn't you get your dream town?
Need a cranky and Apple moved out so I would like to replace her with another peppy
Isn't that unfair to the people who don't have any dream villagers though?
So should everybody wait to get their dream villagers until everybody has some?
I'm not taking villagers in to trade them out, so no, I don't see what I am doing as unfair. I gave Apple to someone who had her as a dreamy and have 2 villagers reserved for people who have them as dreamies.
And I'll add, Apple came from my campsite as did the two villagers that are reserved, so I'm not "flipping villagers" the way some on these boards do.
Last edited:
(don't feel like quoting but pretend I did)
If someone has a full/almost full dream town, and another person has no/few dream villagers, wouldn't it be more fair to give a mutual dream villager to the one who has gotten 0 from the topic, rather then 20?
If someone has a full/almost full dream town, and another person has no/few dream villagers, wouldn't it be more fair to give a mutual dream villager to the one who has gotten 0 from the topic, rather then 20?
First of all, I haven't gotten 20 villagers from the thread. I've gotten 7, all of which I am extremely grateful for. I don't flip villagers. I gave my villagers that moved out to people who had them as a dreamie whenever possible.
It is up to whoever is giving the animal away if they want to do it as first come/first serve, raffle, whatever. I don't see why being close to your dream town should keep you from getting an animal.
I am not the only one who is 1 or 2 away. If I had achieved a dream village and decided to start all over, yes, that would be obnoxious. I had a villager legitimately move out, and I am giving a board member who lost her village one of my snooties which I would like to replace with a cranky so I have one of each villager type.
Last edited:
jakeypride
Senior Member
I NEEDS A PEPPY! PREFERABLY BLUEZBEARZ
InterestingOtaku
Nobody's a hero when they're crying for air...
Looking for
__________
Genji
Hamphrey
Static
Francine
(Will trade if needed)
__________
Genji
Hamphrey
Static
Francine
(Will trade if needed)
Oop I didn't literally mean 20. That was hypothetical. I don't mean that you flip villagers, hoard them, get popular villagers and have them move into the void or anything. I mean that more people should have equal amounts of dreamies in their towns because some have next to none.
I'm not saying people shouldn't have their dreamies, I'm just saying that I don't think people who are close to achieving their dream town shouldn't be given a chance. When you are down to 1 or 2 dreamies your chances are automatically slimmer because you are only looking for 1 or 2. It would be one thing if I were scooping up villagers left and right to use for trades or selling. I'm simply looking for 2 villagers.
At one point you were looking for 10 (give or take) villagers. So is the random person who is looking for 10 right now. Now you have 2 left, but the random person has 10 left. You both had the same odds of getting a dreamie when you started wanting 10. Shouldn't the random person be allowed to catch up to you and have the same odds? Shouldn't they be happy with a town of dreamies just as you are?
- Status
