Mafia [UNOFFICIAL] [TOWN WINS] Meme Mafia [blueleaf died (town)]

[pillow bunny]

INSERT WITTY COMMENT HERE​

no terrible story this time

i hate memes and it got stale after the first 27.5 days anyways

BlueLeaf aka I Have No Idea What I’m Doing (Townie) died.

You have replaced chees4mees in Meme Mafia.

I Have No Idea What I’m Doing (Townie): You are a mentally divergent dog meme. You have no special abilities and win when all the Mafia members are dead.

--



It is now Day 3. You have 24 hours to send in your votes.​

 

[Superpenguin]

Ghost post fix

 

[BlueLeaf]

I have no idea what I'm doing

 

[Arstotzkan]

Well nothing happened to me last night this time. Kind of an odd kill there, but I guess it can't hurt that there was only one kill last night. Maybe Doc healed successfully?

Anyway, gonna go back and organize a few of my suspicions.

 

[Beardo]

Aight I can work with that (as long as we aren't legitimately lynching them).

##VOTE: Beardo because she's a *****slut and hasn't checked this thread yet smh. She's probably playing League to avoid her guilt.

Should we vote in this thread Day 1 or should we wait to vote until the voting thread is up?

I know this was a joke, but a bunch of people bandwagoned and Kat never corrected them. Also, Forek, the godfather, joined in with her. I know Endless did as well, but that’s more of their playstyle. (though it could also be taken as a joke)

So, Beardo is currently a lynch candidate for today. I want to agree with this lynch, but i want to wait for Beardos response before i vote her. I don't wanna RL Day 1 for essentially nothing.

- - - Post Merge - - -

But, Beardos post also sets up flags, but we cant currently tell her alignment off of one post that didnt have any reaction to the lynch on her. This actually makes her look scummy, or makes her look like she didnt want to respond to the post. This could be the case.

Forek, another mafia memeber, was the only one to continue the vote/suspicion. He seems to just being agreeing with Kat (or vice-versa)

Jesus ****ing christ.

A. I'd like to hear your defense to Endless's FOS.
B. Threatening to lynch somebody is common place, and if the majority think that someone is suspicious enough, then they're going to want them out of the game. That's just how the game goes.
C. Jesus ****ing christ.

At this point, I find this as enough grounds to FOS you. You completely snapped under that pressure. You answered absolutely no questions that've been asked of you, and practically admitted you're mafia. I feel like LaBelle put the FOS here with my thoughts exactly, so I won't bore everyone and repeat it, but I'd like to hear an explanation of why the acts you've chosen are those of a townie player, and not of a mafian trying to sabotage D1 and try to score an early lynch (when several posts that you've FOS'd are jokes).

This post was the tipping point that caused me to change my opinion on the nature of the lynch today. I definitely FOS'd Superpenguin, but as y'all can see, he's acting like a troll today like many players act D1 so I dismissed him as a suspicion for now (let's see if he shapes up D2). My tier two suspicions were of Awesomeness and Cooba because of the FOS's with no real backing (either the reason they gave was obviously a joke by the person quoted or they gave no explanation at all) yet they were being serious, but up until now, I dismissed that as noob syndrome and thought that information garnered tonight (maybe some inspections or blocks or other things) could have shed some new light on their true alignment. I wasn't seriously suspicious of Awesomeness until they refused to justify their suspicions just now and said "I'm not saying that I'm not mafia". You're supposed to be trying to prove to us that you're town, and you've shown an utter disinterest in looking at your past actions to try to prove just that, which is something I find suspicious.

Finally, there's a sort of unrelated thing that I wanted to bring up. Generally, D1, I don't support any lynches. Thing is, most people don't have leads. What kind of leads can we have besides a few people ****ing around? So that being said, it comes down to random lynch. Mafia is a game of an informed minority versus an uninformed majority, so more often than not, who's likely to be lynched in a random lynch? The majority of the population, AKA Town. Yes, Cop won't reveal D2, but what kind of lead does random lynching give town that no lynching doesn't? Better to not risk a Townie dying and wait until people are actually serious about participating in the game and have some slight leads than to try a shot in the dark when no one is being serious, anyways.

Jesus 3 KP. Rip literally a third of this town.

Well I was roleblocked last night, so there's that. I'll try looking into the previous day play and try to find any insight into the kills last night.

None of the dead roles have had the ability to role block, and literally no one else has claimed it the whole game. It’s really not the kind of thing you forget to mention.

 

[doge666]

Ah, my bad. Well then I've got another question:

Why did you vote Awesomeness?

Spoiler

Also, no, I'm not bullying you. If I were bullying you, I'd be attacking you as a person for no reason. I was attacking you as your role so that we could potentially find scum. It's like giving someone flack in a game. It's not a direct attack on their chatacter. One of my biggedt pet peeves is when people claim that they're being bullied without pausing to think of the other person's intentions, so please don't do that.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Oh wait you posted your reasoning as well:
http://www.belltreeforums.com/showt...L-Meme-Mafia&p=5410468&highlight=#post5410468

Okkkk this shows that Kat didn't see that post before, they claimed to have read over the thread but lied. Everything was planned in advance to frame/put suspicion on me.

@beardo I agree we should lynch sarasakat

 

[Arstotzkan]

I know this was a joke, but a bunch of people bandwagoned and Kat never corrected them. Also, Forek, the godfather, joined in with her. I know Endless did as well, but that?s more of their playstyle. (though it could also be taken as a joke)



Forek, another mafia memeber, was the only one to continue the vote/suspicion. He seems to just being agreeing with Kat (or vice-versa)








None of the dead roles have had the ability to role block, and literally no one else has claimed it the whole game. It?s really not the kind of thing you forget to mention.

I lol'd. Alright, let's break this down:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I know this was a joke, but a bunch of people bandwagoned and Kat never corrected them. Also, Forek, the godfather, joined in with her. I know Endless did as well, but that?s more of their playstyle. (though it could also be taken as a joke)

Lol ok. So you're saying because I never said anything against the lynch, I'm scum? What about this?

Aight I can work with that (as long as we aren't legitimately lynching them).

I obviously voiced against the lynch right here. And, to add to it all, here's this:

D1, I don't support any lynches. Thing is, most people don't have leads. What kind of leads can we have besides a few people ****ing around? So that being said, it comes down to random lynch. Mafia is a game of an informed minority versus an uninformed majority, so more often than not, who's likely to be lynched in a random lynch? The majority of the population, AKA Town. Yes, Cop won't reveal D2, but what kind of lead does random lynching give town that no lynching doesn't? Better to not risk a Townie dying and wait until people are actually serious about participating in the game and have some slight leads than to try a shot in the dark when no one is being serious, anyways.

I never voiced a positive word about that lynch. So it's not like I was encouraging it, like you imply. And if you're going to excuse Endless for not saying anything about it because of "meta", then what about any of the people who voted for you? What about the fact that literally nobody in the chat, including you, said anything about the people who voted you in a suspicious light? Everyone thought it was a troll, me included.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Forek, another mafia memeber, was the only one to continue the vote/suspicion. He seems to just being agreeing with Kat (or vice-versa)

Again, this is based off of the assumption that I supported your lynch. Notice from earlier how I never voiced support of the lynch. How, then, is Forek bandwagoning off of someone who isn't even supporting the lynch they're talking about?

I, on the other hand, have a concrete example of how him and I contrasted in opinion:

@Forek Considering that your suspicion is based off of meta, and we've only played one game with Awesomeness, it's probably too early to be assuming their alignment based off of a few posts.

Forek here was in favor of pushing Awesomeness, while I showed hesitation based off of the sole fact that the suspicion was based on meta. You can't get much more concrete than that.
------------------------------------------------------------------

None of the dead roles have had the ability to role block, and literally no one else has claimed it the whole game. It?s really not the kind of thing you forget to mention.

Kek it's Day 2. Literally you and I have been the only two to have posted today that are alive, and with (at minimum) only one person being able to be roleblocked per day, it seems reasonable that someone else besides you and I could have been roleblocked, no? That seems like an awful hasty conclusion there with little to no backing. Plus, why the hell would I fake being roleblocked when it'd be easily disproven throughout the days?

I can tell you the reason you're FOSing me: Kilza from the Skype chat we're in pointed me out as suspicious (admittedly jokingly at first, but still he ended up being serious). Which is utter horse **** because he isn't even in the game - he's just spectating. His argument is that I'm playing too pro-town/too safe. I'm curious to as where he thinks I'm playing it too safe, so if you guys have any input on that, I'll gladly refute it.

I've got a post coming up on you soon though, so stay tuned. You, Cooba, and doge are my top three in my FOSes.

 

[Beardo]

It's true, he did draw attention to you.

 

[Arstotzkan]

Okkkk this shows that Kat didn't see that post before, they claimed to have read over the thread but lied. Everything was planned in advance to frame/put suspicion on me.

@beardo I agree we should lynch sarasakat

If you're going to quote my message, you should seriously answer the question I've asked you in that post that you've neglected to reply to insofar. I've got two things to say about this:

1) What's your evidence that my whole play has been solely based around framing/lynching you? Yes, I am suspicious of you, but you're going to have to provide more examples of that than just the fact that I'm suspicious of you. Also, is it really a sin to accidentally miss something? I admitted my mistake, and if that was something I was doing to intentionally frame you, why would I admit I was wrong there, rather than force you to find the answer?
2) Why do you agree with Beardo? Do you have any evidence that she hasn't put down yet that you'd like to bring to the table?

 

[LaBelleFleur]

2.5-ish hours until lynch, and nobody's voted. Has everyone lost interest?
Voting for Beardo for two reasons:
1. Her case above is extremely weak and doesn't do much to point suspicion at Kat, especially when Kat's been pretty pro-town all game.
2. I was role-blocked last night.

 

[Arstotzkan]

I'll just go one by one and point out Beardo's crimes:

1) Most sheepy post 2k15
2) Last night's kill
3) Their lack of logic behind suspicion
4) Going back on what they said
5) Their inability to reply to a rebuttal.

1)

Fleur, Kat, and Trundle have been very helpful and have been gathering evidence. Cooba and Doge, on the other hand have been extremely inactive and Cooba has yet to answer Kat's question, even after viewing the thread.

Josh covered the suspicion for this post beautifully. She posted nothing new, and literally restated exactly what I said. Her response to this was, "You're sus of me because I didn't want to post the same information over and over?", when that's pretty much exactly what she did. Also, I intentionally left for room for people to pick up some slack in that post so that I could potentially get some town-reads. For example, in doge's suspicion, I stated that they were mentioned by Endless, but that it could have possibly been a typo, and I watched carefully to see if anyone would bring up some counter points that it was potentially just a typo and not a reason to have suspicion against them, but no one brought it up (I am disappoint). But there was definitely room for elaboration, and the fact that Beardo didn't bring up a single point that could have been elaborated on when basically restating what I said shows quite a lack of care and is pretty sus tbh.

2)

As for Endless, this is one of his posts:

"Yo I haven't read any of the thread yet but there isn't a justifiable reason for ever no lynching so stop doing that thanks." For reference, the people that voted for NL were Awesomeness, Beardo, and SarasaKat. I feel like one of the reasons Endless died was because there was one mafia in that list. Since Awesomeness died, that leaves Beardo and Kat. Out of the two, I'm more wary of Beardo. Endless mentioned that Awesomeness was "contributing by non-contributing," which leads to one of Beardo's posts:

"Fleur, Kat, and Trundle have been very helpful and have been gathering evidence. Cooba and Doge, on the other hand have been extremely inactive and Cooba has yet to answer Kat's question, even after viewing the thread."

Am I the only one that thinks this post is shallow and fake, just like Awesomeness' posts were? This feels like a summary post rather than a contributive post.

While I recognize that scum may have tried to avoid Doc heal by trying to kill someone that's likely to not be healed, Blue_Leaf was the only one to voice suspicion over you, and guess who dies that night? Blue_Leaf. That seems kind of odd to be a coincidence.

3) Come on, you know better than that Steph. As I pointed out in my defense, your accusations are solely based off of the fact that I supported a lynch (that I proved I didn't support) and the fact that there was one missing roleblock claim, when you and I were the only two who had posted at that point. And lone and behold, LaBelle was roleblocked. Sounds like you're just trying to get rid of a threat without having to deal with Doc presence.

4)

Fleur, Kat, and Trundle have been very helpful and have been gathering evidence. Cooba and Doge, on the other hand have been extremely inactive and Cooba has yet to answer Kat's question, even after viewing the thread.

In addition, notice how your suspicion is rooted in actions I took D1/a night action I reported early D2. Yet, after these things were posted, you stated that I was helpful. Nothing had happened since then that you brought up that could have totally changed your opinion to pro-town to scum. That's a logic fallacy there.

5) What the heck was that response? You never mentioned that your opinion on me changed, but you didn't rebut against what I had to say. I sense avoidance there. You can't be content to not reply and still be suspicious of me unless you had malicious intentions, which is what I suspect at this point.

Because of these 5 reasons, Beardo's earned my vote.

 

[doge666]

I am the jack of all trades, I killed forek and investigated Sarasakat who is mafia (x all the y meme) vote for them

 

[Arstotzkan]

Oh yeah? I think not.

1) Why wouldn't you have mentioned this at the very beginning of the day? **** like that is important, and you've neglected to mention it until now. That seems pretty backwards to me.
2) If I were mafioso, I would have killed N1, no? Explain to me how I managed to kill, and yet still be roleblocked.
3) You have a motivation for lying about this too - you've sided with Beardo on almost everything. I'll get evidence for this in a second.

- - - Post Merge - - -

http://www.belltreeforums.com/search.php?searchid=4575301

Look, everytime Beardo has posted, you have posted shortly after. I see this as a last ditch attempt to try to protect your mate from winning, and it looks like if there's two mafia left, you guys are going to win.

This sucks literal ass. We found both mafians, but since one of them decided to bull**** some claim, we're going to lose.

 

[Forek]

I am the jack of all trades, I killed forek and investigated Sarasakat who is mafia (x all the y meme) vote for them

So you literally killed me because you h8 me lolol (but im a ghost messenger )

 

[Arstotzkan]

You guys are probably gonna ask for a claim, so a claim I shall provide:

I am the Insanity Dog. Basically, just your average townie. But this is LYLO today, and with such little time left, it looks like mafia's got it in the bag.

 

[LaBelleFleur]

Ugh I don't know who to vote for.

What happens in the event of a tie, no lynch?

 

[pillow bunny]

Ugh I don't know who to vote for.

What happens in the event of a tie, no lynch?

The first person to have reached the tie number of votes will die.

SarasaKat will die because when Beardo had 2 votes they weren't tied.

- - - Post Merge - - -

whoops that made no sense but you know what I mean

 

[Arstotzkan]

Ugh, looks like maf wins then.

Gg guys. Hopefully we can get it next game.

 

[LaBelleFleur]

The first person to have reached the tie number of votes will die.

SarasaKat will die because when Beardo had 2 votes they weren't tied.

- - - Post Merge - - -

whoops that made no sense but you know what I mean

Ah, right, majority lynch. ****, sorry guys.

 

[Arstotzkan]

Hopefully Cooba gets on within the next few minutes to overturn this