Warning : guilt ahead

[DoctorPaine]

Mmmm.....

Yeah, I think I'll probably be okay with it |D On the basis of... for whatever reason, the PC's the one given veto power, maybe they're the one doing heavy surveying and everything, so to me it's more like:

'Well that spot's not exactly stable enough for a full house yet', or 'this area's being zoned off for a park'/etc. And it's not like I'm gonna give anyone a crappy space (... hopefully), it'll be nice being able to ensure nice residential zones but also organized/nicer wild space.

 

[MarcelTheFool]

For me no guilt. They ask you despite having just as much of a right to live there we as we do, I like to think they're just asking "Hey hows this look to you?". As like a second opinion, you know? If I get Tabby, Katt, or Pietro in my town I want them to be my neighbors not super far away!

 

[JKDOS]

Why would anyone have guilt over moving a villager's house? LOL, they do nothing productive and contribute in no measurable way.

 

[DinoTown]

It will be phrased so there is no guilt. The same as getting a villager who wants to move to stay in NL.
They want to move, but oh no, they are a dreamie and you Mister are not going anywhere. Sit back down. But it's not phrased like that. It's "please don't go" or something like that, to which they always accept.
Bearing in mind this is kinda a kids game, they aren't gonna be placing the weight of the world on a kid (and to a kid, that guilt really is the weight of the world)

 

[JKDOS]

Bearing in mind this is kinda a kids game, they aren't gonna be placing the weight of the world on a kid (and to a kid, that guilt really is the weight of the world)

I feel like Animal Crossing is a game for everyone and not a kids' game. While Nintendo can make the game with kids in mind, I doubt they're targeting the game solely towards kids.

 

[Melodie]

My villagers can put their houses wherever they want to put it. Back in the other games, I was
never so nitpicky when it comes to the placements of villager houses. I just work around it and
it always worked (kinda). And I will do the same in New Horizons too.

 

[BluebearL]

Oh wow lol. I kind of like it at the same time, everyone (or at least a lot of people) are attached to their first favourite villagers that they ever had when they first started animal crossing. For me it's Kiki. Nintendo are taking advantage of our emotions to stop us from taking all the power in the game!

What fun would animal crossing be without the annoying bits

 

[Sweetley]

Normally, my villagers have all the freedom in terms of placing their houses. However, I would maybe move
a house if needed, but only if it's really needed.

 

[isabll]

Not at all, I'm glad they're letting us choose where to place their houses! I can see myself feeling pretty guilty about kicking out villagers who've been with me a long time, like the first two you get when you move to the island.

 

[Blue Cup]

I allow my towns to develop organically , so unless they are literally on my doorstep as has happened in New Leaf before, they will get to stay wherever they decide to plop their cottage.

But I wouldn't feel bad if I had to tell them their location wasn't acceptable. They'll get over it once the town begins developing and they see that their sacrifice was for the greater good.

 

[oath2order]

I allow my towns to develop organically , so unless they are literally on my doorstep as has happened in New Leaf before, they will get to stay wherever they decide to plop their cottage.

But I wouldn't feel bad if I had to tell them their location wasn't acceptable. They'll get over it once the town begins developing and they see that their sacrifice was for the greater good.

That sounds about right for me! I generally don't care where they move.

 

[Lavamaize]

I swear if I get Wart Jr. ....

 

[Tasty]

I very rarely kick people out... IMO I try to play like I did on GameCube, when everything was new to me. If I stuck with the same set of villagers every game I'd probably get kinda bored. Meeting villagers I've never seen before in the series despite playing since the start will never not be exciting for me.

 

[Antonio]

yeah... uh....
i'm telling them where they're putting their houses

Right? I'll be like, "This is my island and I'm your dictator now. Either you do as I say or else".

 

[Alyx]

Alright, I really dig that idea where you're able to choose where they move. I'd really love that. In the beginning I'm not sure if it would matter where they move, but I'll absolutely know what to do once I see the island map! I've heard there are tiers!

 

[Boccages]

Alright, I really dig that idea where you're able to choose where they move. I'd really love that. In the beginning I'm not sure if it would matter where they move, but I'll absolutely know what to do once I see the island map! I've heard there are tiers!

Tiers?

 

[Alyx]

Tiers?

You know how in Population Growing & City Folk there were two levels in the town? That's what I mean.

 

[Cheybunny]

I'd have an easy time saying "no!"

 

[Circus]

Oh geez, that would make me feel guilty. But if Static is one of my starting villagers, I'm chucking my Switch Lite out a window. I'd make him live in complete isolation, or better yet, reset until I don't have to see him anymore.

 

[Stephanie92]

Hmm, if you can reset for villagers at the start, I will be. Now that we can erm, 'influence' where they move, the only important part is who they are. But no, I won't feel guilty for making them move their location. Not even a little. After New Leaf, with Marshal moving in right next to my City Hall and Zell in front of my house, ruining my bushes, nah. I'll make them move alright.