What do you think?

[beehdaubs]

Which do people approve of more?

Im afraid this is tearing TBT apart

Gentlemans agreement for strict constructionism or ppls agreement for not so strict constructionism. Vote for your fav.

 

[beehdaubs]

This might cause havoc......... >.<

 

[coffeebean!]

xD *points at siggy* i see nothing wrong with timetraveling, but of course i would never hack.......

 

[Princess]

haha 100% for not so strict

 

[Mr Yippie]

Niether,

I'm thinking of boobs, honestly.

Transporter 3...huhuhuhuh.

 

[Princess]

points at siggy* XP you know it's true

 

[coffeebean!]

Niether,

I'm thinking of boobs, honestly.

Transporter 3...huhuhuhuh.

you're thinking of boobs? i really hope that was a typo for noobs. xD

 

[beehdaubs]

Probally not........ >.>

 

[Havanacus]

I think they are silly... I'm not going to hack or time travel because this would be no fun for me... I'm also not going to sign them and think that anyone who would refuse to play Animal Crossing online with me, even after talking with me on these forums for this past week, must place a lot of trust in the power of a typed up "contract" on a forum will prevent a spiteful individual from lying... I could understand if we wanted to make a list of people who agreed not to do any of these things but this is not the same...

 

[sidorak19]

I thought this would be resonbly even but it not.

 

[Mr Yippie]

Niether,

I'm thinking of boobs, honestly.

Transporter 3...huhuhuhuh.

you're thinking of boobs? i really hope that was a typo for noobs. xD

 

[technoxmaniac]

i see no reason in making a not so strict constructionism
i mean if you disagree with the one for strict constructionism
then don't sign simple as that

 

[coffeebean!]

Niether,

I'm thinking of boobs, honestly.

Transporter 3...huhuhuhuh.

you're thinking of boobs? i really hope that was a typo for noobs. xD

Oh now you're bringing mario into this? that hurt.....xDDDDD

 

[Micah]

I don't think a small thing like TTing should tear a forum apart. Some might consider it cheating, for others it might be the only way to play AC. Each person is entitled to their own opinion.

 

[sidorak19]

I can't believe it the gentlemans agreement is fighting back

 

[beehdaubs]

oh noes :throwingrottenapples:

 

[Havanacus]

Some might consider it cheating, for others it might be the only way to play AC.

I think these people could off-set there game's clock to reflect the time they do have to play... They shouldn't change it back and forth... This still leaves the households where people share towns but that still isn't the point...

The point is that some people will take note that nook is selling a Royal Crown on the 25th and then time-travel back once they've got the bells to buy it... I wouldn't do this and would rather not play with someone who does... After all, I have to see that crown on my third day of playing and pass it up... I don't want a friend who can make Nook offer it for sale the second he has the bells to pay for it...

 

[Austin30]

I say neither.play the way you wanna!