• Guest, can you feel the love in the air? Valentine's Week at The Bell Tree has begun with a new mini-event featuring four activities to enjoy -- new and returning collectibles are up for grabs! Dive in to the love here.

An idea in times like this

iFly said:
Tyeforce said:
Cooper1901 said:
Tyeforce said:
Quoting limited to 4 levels deepcan
Luxury?! Yeah, sure... because searching for a job for over a *censored.3.0*ing year is a luxury!
Getting no luck, at all. Sending in countless applications, resumes, doing everything within my power to get a job. But to no aveil.

Yeah, of course Tye. That's a real *censored.3.0*ing luxury, I'm so lucky!
In your case, no, it wouldn't be a luxury. I was talking about people who don't have to work, or work very little.
Not having a life is quite the luxury.
As uneventful as a life in front of a computer most of the day may be, it's still a life. It may not sound appealing to everyone, but there are some people who obviously enjoy it, or else they would be doing other things with their time.
 
MrCrazyDavis said:
Tyeforce said:
Marcus said:
Calling the staff is joke is a bit out of order...they have lives you know. They can't be on TBT 24/7 always on the look out for trolls. They're not machines that come on and off at exactly the right time in some kind of "shift". Quite a few of them are at the age where school work is getting harder/more of it, and most normal people would put school before a forum.

Just unlucky when there aren't any on, that's when they strike.
I know that they have lives and can't be on TBT all the time, that's to be expected. But that's why they should promote people who can be on TBT most of the time. There are people out there who have the time to be online nearly all day. Imagine how many trolling and spamming attempts could be stopped if they promoted people who were online most of the time.
Conor's a very active mod.
Not at all really. I hardly see him on.
 
Cooper1901 said:
Tyeforce said:
iFly said:
Well it would be easier if it were against the rules to respond to trolls.





Whole lot less trolls ibet.
There's a better way; just make trolling against the rules. Or, enforce it, at least. That, and bullying.
I wouldn't say Trolling was allowed now, would you?
According to the rules, it's not. But the rule sure as hell isn't very enforced. If it was, then certain members with a history of trolling would've been banned a long time ago.
 
Tyeforce said:
Cooper1901 said:
Tyeforce said:
iFly said:
Well it would be easier if it were against the rules to respond to trolls.

Whole lot less trolls ibet.
There's a better way; just make trolling against the rules. Or, enforce it, at least. That, and bullying.
I wouldn't say Trolling was allowed now, would you?
According to the rules, it's not. But the rule sure as hell isn't very enforced. If it was, then certain members with a history of trolling would've been banned a long time ago.
Now that, I agree with. But, as for "history"... lately, that word means *censored.3.0*ing nothing!
Want me to elaborate? Of course you do.

Somebody, in that recent thread, that myself and others got banned for.
Jeremy since posted about it and the history and the activity in said thread.
Now, one particular member got banned for 10 days, does he have a history? No.
Did he post all that much in the thread? Like *censored.3.0*ing Hell he did.
 
Cooper1901 said:
Tyeforce said:
Cooper1901 said:
Tyeforce said:
Quoting limited to 4 levels deepenforce it, at least. That, and bullying.
I wouldn't say Trolling was allowed now, would you?
According to the rules, it's not. But the rule sure as hell isn't very enforced. If it was, then certain members with a history of trolling would've been banned a long time ago.
Now that, I agree with. But, as for "history"... lately, that word means *censored.3.0*ing nothing!
Want me to elaborate? Of course you do.

Somebody, in that recent thread, that myself and others got banned for.
Jeremy since posted about it and the history and the activity in said thread.
Now, one particular member got banned for 10 days, does he have a history? No.
Did he post all that much in the thread? Like *censored.3.0*ing Hell he did.
So, you're saying that people should be banned if they troll, whether they have a history of it or not? I agree. Though, maybe not permabanned the first time if it's not too bad, but they at least deserve to be banned for quite some time. Oh, and they shouldn't be allowed to make an alternate account as use it like nothing ever happened before. Way too many banned members get out of their punishment by simply creating new accounts, and the staff doesn't even care!
 
Gnome said:
MrCrazyDavis said:
Tyeforce said:
Marcus said:
Calling the staff is joke is a bit out of order...they have lives you know. They can't be on TBT 24/7 always on the look out for trolls. They're not machines that come on and off at exactly the right time in some kind of "shift". Quite a few of them are at the age where school work is getting harder/more of it, and most normal people would put school before a forum.

Just unlucky when there aren't any on, that's when they strike.
I know that they have lives and can't be on TBT all the time, that's to be expected. But that's why they should promote people who can be on TBT most of the time. There are people out there who have the time to be online nearly all day. Imagine how many trolling and spamming attempts could be stopped if they promoted people who were online most of the time.
Conor's a very active mod.
Not at all really. I hardly see him on.
That's because I live 5+ hours ahead of you.(possibly more)

Anyway enough of this.

Topic Locked
 
Back
Top