FrostyAlmonds
Senior Member
Okay, first off to continue with the vote inactive or no thing. I'm still on team vote inactive. BUT, I'm not saying right here and now that I'm voting Boring. I still want to see if they show up, or if someone screams mafia to me to get my vote. Even without the existence of modkill, I don't think they will help solve the game later on if they aren't doing anything now? This is more of a game meta opinion than a game winning perspective--so probably an awful take for mafia, but I just feel like if they aren't super active than they may not be as invested to the game. So I'd rather not kick out someone who is really wanting to play and making things more lively/exciting in favour of protecting someone who will post the bare minimum and not engage.
And reiterating again that this is if there is no information to strongly suspect a maf member and I'm throwing a random name in the hat for voting. The inactive player still has just as much chance of rolling maf as the active player so...
@tessa grace . Curious. if you are adamantly against voting for Boring for inactivity, do you have any thoughts on who you want to vote yet? IIRC you said you didn't want to vote no elim. Not putting you on the spot if you don't have any ideas yet (I've already said I'm waiting things out longer too after all), just curious because I don't remember reading if you had any opinions on anyone yet. If you did...I'm sorry I have the memory of a goldfish.
Also, is your stance on fully against voting inactive just a day one play or any day play? (I'm sorry to ask this since you expressed how much you hate it!) If final 3 ended up being you (as town), an active player, and the inactive player who hasn't contributed much all game, how would proceed then? I hope this doesn't read accusatory to your opinion, I just want to better understand your perspective.
Uh, minus your townread on Betsy of course. Though I don't think that can really count yet since Betsy wasn't 100% on her role. I guess we'll see how her perspective changes now that she is caught up (congrats Betsy! Be honest, you town or maf? )
Sorry Tessa, another question for you. What do you mean you don't (have the same game plan)? In the case you were town back to back you wouldn't play the same way? If it was town to maf, wouldn't it be suspicious if you completely changed your opinions in the next game? Like, wouldn't that be an easy tell if one game you were adamantly against voting inactive, then the next you were wishywashy about it or aiming your pitchforks?
And reiterating again that this is if there is no information to strongly suspect a maf member and I'm throwing a random name in the hat for voting. The inactive player still has just as much chance of rolling maf as the active player so...
Post automatically merged:
@tessa grace . Curious. if you are adamantly against voting for Boring for inactivity, do you have any thoughts on who you want to vote yet? IIRC you said you didn't want to vote no elim. Not putting you on the spot if you don't have any ideas yet (I've already said I'm waiting things out longer too after all), just curious because I don't remember reading if you had any opinions on anyone yet. If you did...I'm sorry I have the memory of a goldfish.
Also, is your stance on fully against voting inactive just a day one play or any day play? (I'm sorry to ask this since you expressed how much you hate it!) If final 3 ended up being you (as town), an active player, and the inactive player who hasn't contributed much all game, how would proceed then? I hope this doesn't read accusatory to your opinion, I just want to better understand your perspective.
Post automatically merged:
Uh, minus your townread on Betsy of course. Though I don't think that can really count yet since Betsy wasn't 100% on her role. I guess we'll see how her perspective changes now that she is caught up (congrats Betsy! Be honest, you town or maf? )
Post automatically merged:
because i don't, haha. what's freaky is how almost identical the two discussions have been. it's like just off putting, because when looking for her opinion on ia in other threads i was not expecting something so similar. in monster mash she also talked about how f3 with an inactive is bad and that was also just mentioned.
Sorry Tessa, another question for you. What do you mean you don't (have the same game plan)? In the case you were town back to back you wouldn't play the same way? If it was town to maf, wouldn't it be suspicious if you completely changed your opinions in the next game? Like, wouldn't that be an easy tell if one game you were adamantly against voting inactive, then the next you were wishywashy about it or aiming your pitchforks?
Last edited: