Yeah, I've already clarified and I can relate so please don't say that I think I'm more mature?
When I say "you" it's usually in a general sense
Yeah, I've already clarified and I can relate so please don't say that I think I'm more mature?
In the case the OP used as an example, by the time he gets out of prison he'll be like 75-ish, and I've never seen a horny 75 year old man. His sex drive will have died by then.
I think it's unfair to hold grudges against people who are going to jail. It just sounds like a childish angry mob. We may as well be stoning criminals, because everyone saying "he should be executed, murdered, skinned alive, ect" is extremely savage and you may as well be a brainless caveman. The justice system works the way it does for a reason, that's all there is to it.
Here, our legal system is fine. I don't know why the outrage on her being 16, because 14 is actually the 'semi-legal' age here. It's hard to explain to braindead people, but at 14 the law is that children are able to make their own choices(i.e sex). This law came into place when a 14 year old girl went to her doctor because she had sex (consenting) and was refused an abortion (which is even harder to explain to countries who have banned abortions altogether). Now, the law is that if you are 14-16 and you go to your GP for contraceptive or for an abortion, the authorities won't be called. But the 'legal' age for having sex is 16. I'm not justifying rape, but I am just clearing up the age thing.
I think his sentence was fine, especially if you take into account this will include a historical sex abuse charge with his other daughter.
Rape is just as bad as murder in my opinion. Rape means a victim is traumatized for the rest of their life, and murder means that the victim's family suffers with grief and sorrow. It causes emotional pain, and in some cases (like a survivor of the Columbine massacre), a survivor or family member kills themselves thanks to the emotional pain. Rape can also cause suicide and it changes people forever.
Murder sometimes only gives you 15-20 years, but mass killing (such as a spree killer or serial killer) usually gives you life. So, in my opinion, raping someone multiple times or being a serial rapist should equal to life imprisonment, whilst a singular rape should give you 15-30 years along with a permanent sexual offender registry.
However, there are some problems with the legal system, such an example is Norway. Anders Breivik killed 70+ people and only got 21 or so years because life imprisonment doesn't exist there. All countries should make mass killings and serial raping a life imprisonment sentence. Especially Norway.
Anders is definitely going to be assassinated when he gets out lol.
That's just my opinion, though.
No they need to be executed, or put in jail forever. Especially pedophile rapists.
I don't think anyone is saying that there's anything wrong with a 16 year old consenting to sex, but when it comes to raping a 16 year old, it is still seen as raping a child and not an adult because a 16 year old is not fully mature still (in most cases). That's where the problem lies, not whatever the age of consent is, but the fact that a child is being violated by an adult. Now, I understand that actually skinning people and killing people is "savage" as you say. However, I'm sure you understand why people would feel this way, especially about child rapists, or parents who rape their own children. It might be easy to say, "Oh but they are people too, we must treat them with dignity." But when you know someone who has been raped, or you yourself are a victim, or that happened to your own child, I'm sure it will be hard to say, "Treat them fairly." I respect your opinion, but I think that this is a topic that isn't black and white. Yes, the right thing to do is to treat them fairly with dignity, but it isn't so easy for some people to feel that way when you see a child who has been traumatised and damaged because of rape, or even a fully grown person suffering because it happened to them. So I wouldn't say it's a "savage" thing to want them to die or suffer, but rather a very human thing. Not right, morally speaking, but a very natural reaction for people.
That's just my two cents, anyway.
I didn't say that but "his sex drive would have died by then" isn't guaranteed either.
Whether the justice system ruins someone's life or not is irrelevant. People have every right and every reason to be mad at and hate people like this, as well as wish for worse to happen to them. Having emotions regardless of how strong they are is never a childish or stupid thing and you aren't more mature than someone for not being able to relate to them.
For some reason, I always thought pepper spray was illegal.. Or is that just bear mace?
I think jailed for life should be used for someone who takes a life or lives..
Just speaking from personal experience, being raped/sexually abused/exploited can be just as bad as taking someone's life, because of the psychological damage that victims have to live with. it messed you up for life, and for many, it becomes too much and they take their own life.
for these reasons, i respectfully disagree with your statement.
Sometimes rape can be as bad as murder depending on the circumstances, but most of the time, alive is better than dead even with the psychological damage inflicted. One of the unintended consequences of saying rape = murder and that rapists should automatically spend life in prison or be executed is that it may send the message to rapists that they might as well kill the victim since they have nothing to lose at that point from a legal standpoint. At least there are resources to try to help rape victims cope with the damage, but there are no resources to bring someone back to life.
whySadly i've already recieved an infraction so i can't say something ****ed up. Honestly i don't care about it, they should just bring back the eye for an eye concept so that the victims can do some scarring **** to deter sex offenders
- - - Post Merge - - -
Oh yeah, i remember what it was called now. The principle of retaliation
I mean, that's why I tried not to use the definite phrase "is", I said it CAN be. I do agree with your sentiment that it could send that bad message, but also keep in mind that not all rapists are looking to kill a person, either. (For whatever reason, some can live with raping a person, but not with killing a person, ain't that some fascinating psychological caca?)
Sentences should be stricter than what they are in America now, I'm still angry over the Brock Turner thing. I have a lemon that has been in my fridge longer than he was in jail, after ADMITTING to rape.
Now, my boyfriend is a former cop, and we had a LONG hard talk about why that went down the way it did. It was all due to Turner accepting a plea deal, which is why he got such a light sentence.
That said, that judge should go under review for even giving him the OPTION of such a lightly sentenced plea deal.
It's a whole huge mess and I don't want to recant most of the discussion he and I had, but the hard truth of the matter is that between false rape allegations that result in rape kits being taken and backing up testing centers so that cases of genuine rape do not get processed in a timely manner, an already corrupted judicial system, and multiple other factors...rape cannot and will never be properly dealt with in our country.
It's extremely upsetting and frustrating. To me, Brock Turner's entire court case was a huge slap in the face. It's hypocritical, since I strongly oppose vigilante justice, but I genuinely want(ed) to see him fry. Nothing like that should ever happen in the court of law ever again, rape should be taken more seriously. Period. I'm not saying life sentences, but such a forgiving plea bargain is disgraceful.
Depends on where you are. In the UK, the closest thing you can buy is this pink stuff that stains. Of course, I'm sure you could easily find something that would sting if sprayed at someone. Just make sure it wouldn't cause eye damage.
You could probably use deodorant/body spray or perfume. I live in a **** neighbourhood so I walk home with my keys between my fingers. It normally deters attackers but there's sometimes that one idiot who tries to touch you and... well, you know face-full of metal.
I don't even know why they banned mace here.
they banned it mostly due to improper use, people pepper spraying people who weren't attacking them and so on. stupid people ruin things for everyone
if you use your keys as a means of defense, may i suggest one of these? you put your fingers through the eyeholes and use it to jab an attacker, they're legal and much easier to obtain than having to skirt around laws about what's considered a switchblade and what isn't, legalities regarding pepper spray, etc
Ugh, this is why we can't have nice things in this world..
But yes, that looks amazing! I have unfortunately had to use keys in self defence before, so I think I'll definitely buy this. And it's actually really cute oh my god.
- - - Post Merge - - -
HOLD THE PHONE THEY'RE SELLING KNIVES ON AMAZON US WHAT THE HELL
View attachment 195414
i mean holosexual alert it's pretty but ????? that could, like, kill somebody???????????????
10 years is probably fair
10 years is probably fair
The jabber keychains are a reall great subtle way for self defense! I have one that looks like a german shepherd, along with an assisted opening knife, and some......perfectly...legal......police grade mace from my boyfriend >___>
The thing to keep in mind with knives is, yes, you can get them off amazon, and yes, they CAN even kill. He armed me with these tools because I work night shift alone, and he wanted me safe. The condition for me having them is that he taught me how to use them in the same manner that he used to teach self defense classes when he was still an active officer. This includes the rule that I never brandish them; I am only to bring out my knife if I intend, and have reason, to use it. Mind, that's a very big decision to make in a split second if something were to happen, but that's why he gave me less lethal tools of protection as well.
I'm really anti-gun, and when we started dating, it was a very big adjustment to be around guns, since he carries when we go out. But the same rule for my knife applies with his firearm, if he draws, he's already made the decision to fire, and taught me how to react and what to do should he ever have to when I'm near.
If you're going to be armed with something potentially lethal, you need to be responsible. (Not to mention looking up your state/country's laws regarding switch/assisted open knife, but the rules can often be unclear so it's often hard to see what is legal or not.)
- - - Post Merge - - -
I'm curious about your reasoning?