Do you think Nintendo Was Lazy when they made this
- Thread starter Vivi
- Start date
Freddy Fro
Senior Member
I'm going to repost this to this page 'cause it was a pain to type up... Lol 
(QR)
Of course they were.
While I'm in no way saying that the game is crappy, I xxxxxxxx it! I'm saying it could've been an amazing addition to the series, I mean look at Mario Galaxy. It didn't just take Sunshine or 64 and add a section to it or add some things here and there, they made it into the game it is, completely separate atmosphere to the others.
If you say they weren't being lazy, you obviously haven't played the first two iterations. You can tell that this wasn't a true sequel, it was a "catch-up" for those who have never played an Animal Crossing before, for example I had my mom play AC:CF yesterday, her first time playing any AC game as far as I can remember, and now she's hooked. And when the next Animal Crossing comes out she'll no doubt want to play that too. So sure they added the City and took additions to both games that made them great, (IE: Rolling log effect from WW, things like that) and just somewhat rolled them into one. On IGN Wii's review of CF it hit the nail on the head I suggest reading it, but all in all if you have played the first two AC you won't notice any huge, game defining differences between this and the past versions.
I feel that Nintendo could have made a wonderful, true, sequel if they would have been given more time, but due to they had really no first-party games ready at the time for the Christmas season, they no doubt pushed the developers into getting this thing ready in time.
But again, as a veteran Animal Crosser, it's hard for me to feel that this game was pushed as far as it could have been, but at the same time the game's charm and laid back relaxation feel to it that you've come to expect from an Animal Crossing game is a extremely nice break from today's fast paced action games, and one welcomed with open arms!
Fro~
(QR)
Of course they were.
While I'm in no way saying that the game is crappy, I xxxxxxxx it! I'm saying it could've been an amazing addition to the series, I mean look at Mario Galaxy. It didn't just take Sunshine or 64 and add a section to it or add some things here and there, they made it into the game it is, completely separate atmosphere to the others.
If you say they weren't being lazy, you obviously haven't played the first two iterations. You can tell that this wasn't a true sequel, it was a "catch-up" for those who have never played an Animal Crossing before, for example I had my mom play AC:CF yesterday, her first time playing any AC game as far as I can remember, and now she's hooked. And when the next Animal Crossing comes out she'll no doubt want to play that too. So sure they added the City and took additions to both games that made them great, (IE: Rolling log effect from WW, things like that) and just somewhat rolled them into one. On IGN Wii's review of CF it hit the nail on the head I suggest reading it, but all in all if you have played the first two AC you won't notice any huge, game defining differences between this and the past versions.
I feel that Nintendo could have made a wonderful, true, sequel if they would have been given more time, but due to they had really no first-party games ready at the time for the Christmas season, they no doubt pushed the developers into getting this thing ready in time.
But again, as a veteran Animal Crosser, it's hard for me to feel that this game was pushed as far as it could have been, but at the same time the game's charm and laid back relaxation feel to it that you've come to expect from an Animal Crossing game is a extremely nice break from today's fast paced action games, and one welcomed with open arms!
Fro~
CoDe_RaNDoM
Senior Member
It could be better.
But overall, no.
They got lazy with Wild World.
Not City Folk.
But overall, no.
They got lazy with Wild World.
Not City Folk.
Kpspen said:Like N64 or the classic Nintendo, which I never really played. I just played the console games on the Wii, since I was born after the super nintendo era.[/quote the nintendo era has good games#gsw1996 said:true dat
bellabear5899
Junior Member
well i have ac for ds and i thought it was a fun game... until i borrowed it from my bro the game cube 1 i just got a wii for christmas but have not played cf yet...
Freddy Fro
Senior Member
I don't think they were lazy with Wild World at all! I mean they practically took a Gamecube(N64) game and put it on a small, limited space cartridge for the DS, and not to mention that WW introduced hats and accessories, and some would argue that that is one huge addition to AC.CoDe_RaNDoM said:
And also some people forget that WW was indeed the game that introduced Wifi playing to the Animal Crossing world, and that's also a huge step for AC.
Fro~
gerardo781
Senior Member
They weren`t lazy. They just didnt put in enough effort.
Little Miss
Senior Member
So not lazy! Amazing! I thought Wild World wasn't the best, so it's so better. Plus, the city area must've took ages!!!
dsmaster64
Senior Member
Well, I'd say they weren't lazy with the new content, but they were lazy with not that many changes.
Similar threads
- Poll
