What I noticed most about what Daniel did was that he didn't back out of his lynch lead, he kept his feet firm in the sand and proceeded despite the backlash. If he was scum this would be a very, very bad move. Either he's incredibly clever scum/has Tom as a teammate instructing his every move, which I guess you could try and back up a theory on with Tom's post defending him
If I recall correctly, he started the bandwagon before Tom was in the game and Haydenn was banned. He seemed to me the type to start an an easy mislynch. I saw it as him trying to get anyone lynched , and the other players seemed either not suspicious enough or too experienced for him to pin on. That left him with Starry who as I explained would be an easy mislynch.
[qoute=Kit]So we're working with two main theory's here on Daniel as far as I'm concerned. Either he is indeed just a very bold town player/bad scum or he and Tom are teamed together and planning a master mind-f*** on us. The latter of which I really doubt, especially because Daniel almost got himself lynched on D1 before Tom even came into the game. Which actually makes your theory impossible.
But he didn't. He had a close call but people wanted to lynch Starry more than him. His defense about his choice after Starry was announced as Blue Role is what makes him suspicious to me. He kept replying to Oath instead of admitting his mistake, and he did it on Night where people will likely see him as a lynch material the next day.
Though of course as you said, it might be my inexperience showing and I'm misinterpreting actions for something else entirely. I'll look back on old posts.
Kit said:
Please inform me at what point was he panicking? All he did was answer any question thrown at him. Was he really next-to-lynch? No, I don't think so.
It's a poor choice of words on my part, but from his frequency of replies and what he choose to reply, I get the impression that he was panicking, or at least wasn't sure what to do. I will try to round up his posts later when I'm not on mobile, along with rechecking my assumptions on him
Kit said:
This is really, really, really hard to believe. First off Tom isn't a player to put out a fire, he's the one who starts it and watches it burn. If he and his team could benefit off of lynching a fellow mafia player to make themselves look good, specifically one like Daniel he absolutely would jump at the opportunity and we'd probably all buy it.
I've only played one game with Tom and he seemed similar with how he made himself to be town-aligned on your game and then pointing Ness as mafia. I thought he might play similarly in this game.
I wasn't around on other games where he is mafia and I can't really take his old playstyle into consideration because I wasn't around on that game. So Tom would do this Tom would do that would not convince me atm.
Kit said:
Said right after Tom's post on Trundle.
I don't trust Tom so I wouldn't trust his reads. That was directed at other players who are not on my suspicion list.
TL;DR My read isn't the best but that is what I'm thinking right now. I still think Daniel and Tom are suspicious, and my points might not be right, and I expected people to turn on me for my lacking reading. Take that as you will. I'm gonna reread their replies now.
- - - Post Merge - - -
I screwed up the codes whoops
