Mafia [GAME THREAD] Karen Mafia (Endgame - Mafia Wins)

[Antonio]

you mention rnging originally as a joke to garner discussion, that you wouldn’t do it, and now you’re dead set on rnging again

we should at least agree on plausible reasons to nuke people instead of settling to kill random numbers. i’m not averse to getting rid of inactives to make this game easier for us in subsequent days

i also don’t understand the few TLs on mog when she has next to no posts. how do u deduce that from what she’s stated thus far?

I agree but there's so little time to come to a plausible reason. I literally have read everyone thoughts but my opinions are neutral on the majority. I don't think anyone is sus right now and that worries me. I would've preferred voting off an inactive user, incase they get mod killed to lower the number of people being voted off today but I'm not sure how the modkilling goes tbh and the OP confuses me. RNG makes more sense then voting for someone without a plausible reason.

Regarding Mog, me and her were Masons together so I had to closely read her posts during that game. All her current posts feels town-aligned regarding tone and grammar and the only noticeable difference is her lack of posts.

 

[Ace Marvel]

Guava was right out of the 241 post only 28 are mine, I only have like 11% of the thread. SAD. I like to be around 25% at least.

 

[Endless]

Not a fan of Antonio opting to random vote despite multiple lynches existing.
I just don't think he thinks that there's any way volt will be lynched here, so (if he's town) he's voluntarily giving up his vote as town.
Rubs me a little the wrong way, imma scrap my earlier townlean on him.

I feel like we're going to get into a semantics argument, but "the post" I was referring to was regarding RNG. The surprise he demonstrated due to pressure was in the Aerious/Antonio discussion. There was no significant attention garnered from "the post" he made regarding RNG, aside from aerious' comment about not wanting you to be on the lynching block and my questioning of him of his motives.

So you're saying he expected to get attention from the RNG post, but not from his comment re: Aerious, so if someone pressured him over the RNG post it would've been a much less defensive reaction?
I dunno I just don't really agree with that. If you're prepared to receive attention you're prepared to receive attention. I don't think what he received attention from is all that relevant.

I do not trust Ace at all, nor do I townread him. This is my second game with him. Where'd you get that impression?

Honestly feel like I'm grasping at shadows at this point.
Did I misinterpret the following?

omg ace did you make a tarot reading of the game that's iconic

I was slight SLing Ace but above brings me back to null for him. I think the nervousness in his posting was because of that more than alignment-related reasons.

 

[voltairenism]

i'm against a mog lynch bc i'm against lynching for inactivity but conversely townreading her off 4 posts is a stretch

actually I wasnt recognizing the names on OP so i thought there were like 3 inactives, but the only inactives are mog and amazon so Idk how I feel about it now

 

[Aerious]

i'm against a mog lynch bc i'm against lynching for inactivity but conversely townreading her off 4 posts is a stretch

the thing is that it’s mountainous and we need to trust each other late game. there needs to be posts to compare things to and analyze. i’m very pro voting off an inactive bc it’s to the benefit of town

 

[Antonio]

I suggested voting for an inactive earlier but tons of people where against it, originally. Therefore, I let it died along with the rest of my dreams.

 

[Aerious]

I suggested voting for an inactive earlier but tons of people where against it, originally. Therefore, I let it died along with the rest of my dreams.

why would what other people think alter your vote though? if you’re for it, why would you let it die instead of defending it? why swap to rnging a vote instead of voting for who YOU want?

 

[voltairenism]

the thing is that it’s mountainous and we need to trust each other late game. there needs to be posts to compare things to and analyze. i’m very pro voting off an inactive bc it’s to the benefit of town

inactive lynch basically no-lynch because with the new rules they will be modkilled soon, it's a waste

 

[dedenne]

voting off an inactive doesnt help town because theres literally no info to gain and theyre gonna get modkilled anyway. theres not much point in wasting a lynch on someone who hasnt said much if theyll get mked. imo its much better to lynch someone who we actually think is scum

 

[Aerious]

voting off an inactive doesnt help town because theres literally no info to gain and theyre gonna get modkilled anyway. theres not much point in wasting a lynch on someone who hasnt said much if theyll get mked. imo its much better to lynch someone who we actually think is scum

why would you be for a modkill??? i’d rather vote an inactive than have multiple people dying off and forcing us into a mylo situation

 

[Tensu]

the thing is that it’s mountainous and we need to trust each other late game. there needs to be posts to compare things to and analyze. i’m very pro voting off an inactive bc it’s to the benefit of town

I understand but voting for an inactive could likely be a mislynch. Idk if we have any other ideas but it’s true that: a. inactives are no help because they’re... inactive. And b. they could end up modkilled in this game if we don’t lynch them possibly causing us to lose yet another townie. Just saying it’s important to weigh out our options.

Part of me feels like scum wouldn’t be inactive, and that they’re blending in with other contributing townies. But don’t get me wrong, I don’t understand townreading mog from her three posts. She’s definitely null for me.

 

[Antonio]

why would what other people think alter your vote though? if you’re for it, why would you let it die instead of defending it? why swap to rnging a vote instead of voting for who YOU want?

I came to the conclusion that voting for an inactive person wouldn't lead to much information coming from their lynch. I had doubts for the suggestion and I felt like defending it would be useless due to the responses.

Post automatically merged: Aug 15, 2020

inactive lynch basically no-lynch because with the new rules they will be modkilled soon, it's a waste

Yes but if we let them be mod killed, it would increase the amount of people dying during day 1. The more people we have alive, the better.

 

[g u a v a]

i would vote for the inactive personally. why's everyone so certain that they're not maf? tbh they could've just forgotten abt it

 

[Aerious]

evan hasn’t posted anything and they’re more than likely going to die. mog has 3 posts (?)

I came to the conclusion that voting for an inactive person wouldn't lead to much information coming from their lynch. I had doubts for the suggestion and I felt like defending it would be useless due to the responses.

hard disagree. most people posting have no idea who to go for, so i genuinely don’t believe much info will be garnered from whoever is eliminated today. maf is easily within one of the people confused on who to vote for just bc that’s most people in this game rn (inc me) — that’s why i want a game plan on who to vote for

I understand but voting for an inactive could likely be a mislynch. Idk if we have any other ideas but it’s true that: a. inactives are no help because they’re... inactive. And b. they could end up modkilled in this game if we don’t lynch them possibly causing us to lose yet another townie. Just saying it’s important to weigh out our options.

Part of me feels like scum wouldn’t be inactive, and that they’re blending in with other contributing townies. But don’t get me wrong, I don’t understand townreading mog from her three posts. She’s definitely null for me.

i agree with your last point, which is why i’m ok with anyone under the post limit. i don’t see how mog is tl’d here

 

[Endless]

Lynching an inactive is a huge waste of a day phase.

Let me put it like this to really drive it home: Option a) Town doesn't lynch, the inactive player dies to a modkill. b) Town lynches the inactive player, no modkill occurs. In both scenarios the only dead player is the inactive.

This example illustrates that lynching an inactive is essentially no voting. I shouldn't need to drive in how bad no voting is.

Additionally, voting for an inactive is something mafia can do without any effort, so you'd just let mafia blend in with the crowd.
And finally, aren't there replacements? So the inactives shouldn't even be modkilled.

 

[voltairenism]

Yes but if we let them be mod killed, it would increase the amount of people dying during day 1. The more people we have alive, the better.

ngl didnt think about it, it's not a NL, it could be 2 ML in a row

ok lets do mog them, shes been poising us with vaccine and masks??? i cant do this

 

[Ace Marvel]

15>14 /13 D/N1
13>12 / 11 D/N2
11>10 /9 D/N3
9>8 /7 D/N4
7>6 D5 with no mafia kills

with modkills and another misvote
15>14 /11 D/N1
11>10 /9 D/N2
9>8 /7 D/N3
7>6 D4 with no mafia kills

So we have 4-5 days to find anyone in the mafia team.

 

[Antonio]

hard disagree. most people posting have no idea who to go for, so i genuinely don’t believe much info will be garnered from whoever is eliminated today. maf is easily within one of the people confused on who to vote for just bc that’s most people in this game rn (inc me) — that’s why i want a game plan on who to vote for

This was earlier ofc, when there was still time to come to a proper gameplan. We literally have 50 minutes and most of that time, I won't be here.

 

[g u a v a]

Lynching an inactive is a huge waste of a day phase.

Let me put it like this to really drive it home: Option a) Town doesn't lynch, the inactive player dies to a modkill. b) Town lynches the inactive player, no modkill occurs. In both scenarios the only dead player is the inactive.

This example illustrates that lynching an inactive is essentially no voting. I shouldn't need to drive in how bad no voting is.

Additionally, voting for an inactive is something mafia can do without any effort, so you'd just let mafia blend in with the crowd.
And finally, aren't there replacements? So the inactives shouldn't even be modkilled.

eh you dont know they're not maf tho so,....,.,.,.

 

[Antonio]

Lynching an inactive is a huge waste of a day phase.

Let me put it like this to really drive it home: Option a) Town doesn't lynch, the inactive player dies to a modkill. b) Town lynches the inactive player, no modkill occurs. In both scenarios the only dead player is the inactive.

This example illustrates that lynching an inactive is essentially no voting. I shouldn't need to drive in how bad no voting is.

Additionally, voting for an inactive is something mafia can do without any effort, so you'd just let mafia blend in with the crowd.
And finally, aren't there replacements? So the inactives shouldn't even be modkilled.

I literally forgot about replacements.