Mafia [GAME THREAD] Karen Mafia (Endgame - Mafia Wins)

Well, given you're town, lynching anyone is a 3/14 chance of them being maf right? Just based on RNG. A lynch on you would be a 0% chance of hitting maf, and a 3/14 chance is bigger than 0/14.

But you'd basically be RNGing it?
it seems that way rn, yeah.
 
But the RNG thing isn't what drew attention, it was Aerious' claim that Antonio could be faking a question regarding the setup of the game. That's what the debate was about in the end.
I'm referring to your reasoning for townreading Antonio, not the discussion between Aerious and Antonio. (Which I've addressed elsewhere.)
Re: The AI roll I don't think I ever actually explained my justification there, but basically the idea is that he was trying to generate discussion. The way he worded it didn't feel like a meme. It felt like bad logic, yeah, but I got the sense that mafia!him wouldn't want to do that because it'd draw eyes to him for faulty logic, whereas town!him wouldn't mind making that sacrifice to get people to actually talk. In the end no one found him sus for it (even the newbies) and I'm slightly surprised tbh.
Post automatically merged:

The RNG voting roll* askldfjk I just woke up
Bolded portion for relevance.


Additionally, adding epona to my townread bucket based on her defense of specifically glow's push on dedenne, which was fairly logical and plain reasonable.

I'm curious about something though; Kat, you just stated you now trust Ace based on him adhering to his "town meta".
Maybe I have my facts wrong, but I'm under the impression that Ace has never flipped mafia. Since he doesn't have a "mafia meta", no behaviours should be "town meta". They should just be "meta".
Could you elaborate on this a little more for me?
 
I'm caught up and I'm still not completely sure who to vote for.

Regarding dede, I don't think her being hesitant is really AI. She's a NULL read on my end.

I do notice the difference in Ace's playstyle, particularly the lack of seriousness compared to the other game I played. I miss serious Ace. 💔

Everyone guess a number 1-10.
Post automatically merged:

Ace is still a Null btw, since I'm not sure if his meming is more normal compared to previous game.
 
honestly, the reasoning regarding dedenne sus could be applied to mog as well, except that mog is way less active
Post automatically merged:

6
 
I'm curious about something though; Kat, you just stated you now trust Ace based on him adhering to his "town meta".
Maybe I have my facts wrong, but I'm under the impression that Ace has never flipped mafia. Since he doesn't have a "mafia meta", no behaviours should be "town meta". They should just be "meta".
Could you elaborate on this a little more for me?

I will answer that myself, and you are right my meta is my meta, I have never flipped mafia, what's is different these games, is that I learned that even though I'm enjoying the game, if I make it no fun for others is not fair. So I working on finding the right balance of being Nene but at the same time having Daniel's level of solviness, if that make sense.




I will chose the number 7
 
I'm referring to your reasoning for townreading Antonio, not the discussion between Aerious and Antonio. (Which I've addressed elsewhere.)
I feel like we're going to get into a semantics argument, but "the post" I was referring to was regarding RNG. The surprise he demonstrated due to pressure was in the Aerious/Antonio discussion. There was no significant attention garnered from "the post" he made regarding RNG, aside from aerious' comment about not wanting you to be on the lynching block and my questioning of him of his motives.

I'm curious about something though; Kat, you just stated you now trust Ace based on him adhering to his "town meta".
Maybe I have my facts wrong, but I'm under the impression that Ace has never flipped mafia. Since he doesn't have a "mafia meta", no behaviours should be "town meta". They should just be "meta".
Could you elaborate on this a little more for me?
I do not trust Ace at all, nor do I townread him. This is my second game with him. Where'd you get that impression?
 
[QUOTE="Antonio, post: 9496375, member: bruh i backspaced too much

Everyone guess
[/QUOTE]
...
2
i guess 2
i ruined the quote somehow
 
honestly, the reasoning regarding dedenne sus could be applied to mog as well, except that mog is way less active
Post automatically merged:

6
6 was the correct number! it's the Devils number which means I'm voting for ya.

I'm not too confident in my own opinions to have a legit vote so I'm doing this.
 
The only non null reads I have is a slight TL on mog but that's based off of meta.
 
6 was the correct number! it's the Devils number which means I'm voting for ya.

I'm not too confident in my own opinions to have a legit vote so I'm doing this.
you mention rnging originally as a joke to garner discussion, that you wouldn’t do it, and now you’re dead set on rnging again

we should at least agree on plausible reasons to nuke people instead of settling to kill random numbers. i’m not averse to getting rid of inactives to make this game easier for us in subsequent days

i also don’t understand the few TLs on mog when she has next to no posts. how do u deduce that from what she’s stated thus far?
 
I could’ve sworn there was a way to see post counts per person for a thread in the past. I haven’t been able to find it lately though.

also number 4
im pretty sure it got removed in the tbt 3.0 update (maybe idk)
 
you mention rnging originally as a joke to garner discussion, that you wouldn’t do it, and now you’re dead set on rnging again

we should at least agree on plausible reasons to nuke people instead of settling to kill random numbers. i’m not averse to getting rid of inactives to make this game easier for us in subsequent days

i also don’t understand the few TLs on mog when she has next to no posts. how do u deduce that from what she’s stated thus far?
yeah i don't understand it either, I guess it about familiarity but her posts basically give nothing and are pretty safe. inactive lynches are basically NL since they are going to get MK so I guess I would be down to vote for mog for a combo of inactivity and something that looks like maf playing safe
 
no offence but i have nothing to contribute to this discussion as it seems pointless and cloggy, it's also midnight so i'm mostly catching up on the thread, antonio is just being kind of defensive but i think he usually is lol
omg tbh tho??? does this time zone work???? i'm absolutely not getting up at 9am lmaoooo

i do agree aerious and all discussion is helpful blah blah but it's just gonna intimidate people having to read through a lot of pointless discussion imo, i'm sure conversation will liven up as people contribute more hopefully, mafia can't exactly coast thanks to the rules now which is good
I like her tone here. I don't really have much more substantial but when there's as little in the way of opinion as there is now, I'm gonna voice based on my gut.
 
i'm against a mog lynch bc i'm against lynching for inactivity but conversely townreading her off 4 posts is a stretch
 
Back
Top