Mafia Make Mafia Grate Again! Game Over! Town wins!

I do agree with Toadsworthy on the last two parts of his post, the rest sounds like nitpicking. Telling me "The mafia won't shoot you " does sound like a ploy to get me to not protect myself and get shot, although I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt on that one and say that wasn't your intention. Asking for roles is a red flag, however. I don't know how to justify that one.
 
@Point one Yeah, I found it suspicious. Her tone was weird, and that was the best thing to go off of, at the time. What would you have perferred me do? Not bring up anything and let the thread die?

@Point 2 Where was I bluehunting (guessing thats what you mean by feeling out roles)? Your trail of logic is: I'm asking people questions about their stances > ??? > I'm PR hunting. Your logic doesn't follow. And literally the only lurker I called out was Curry. I even defended Cad and Curry later.

@Point 3 Well I had taken it seriously as a scum slip. If you thought someone did something that confirmed themselves as mafia, what would you do? Him and haw over it? No, you'd advocate for their lynch.

@Point 4 I was explaining his reasoning. So clarification/asking for him to contribute is suspicious?

@Point 5 No, I'm not asking for PRs to out themselves. I was thinking evidence from flavour might have been helpful.

@Point 6 You're right - I do want to know if he's actual Doc. Because if he's not, that's suspicious as hell. You don't want to know?
 
I really want to let you off easy because you were the first person to let me off the hook, but mafia is mafia, after all. If someone's playing suspiciously, I can't just let them go.

- - - Post Merge - - -

That being said, still not sure Toadworthy's correct. This is all just speculation, I don't have enough to go on with you.
 
I really want to let you off easy because you were the first person to let me off the hook, but mafia is mafia, after all. If someone's playing suspiciously, I can't just let them go.

- - - Post Merge - - -

That being said, still not sure Toadworthy's correct. This is all just speculation, I don't have enough to go on with you.
If you find me sus, hey, go for me. I just want a reason why. And I'm guessing you're thinking points 5 + 6? What do you think of my defense?

- - - Post Merge - - -

For clarification for 5, I was asking if there was a "dead" player. As in a yes/no answer. Not a full out claim of the role name haha
 
If you find me sus, hey, go for me. I just want a reason why. And I'm guessing you're thinking points 5 + 6? What do you think of my defense?

- - - Post Merge - - -

For clarification for 5, I was asking if there was a "dead" player. As in a yes/no answer. Not a full out claim of the role name haha

Point number 6 I say is fair enough, I still don't understand how someone could give you flavor text without at least hinting at their role though.
 
Point number 6 I say is fair enough, I still don't understand how someone could give you flavor text without at least hinting at their role though.
Eh. I figured it was safe considering I would have never associate Ronald Reagan as a doctor
 
For clarification for 5, I was asking if there was a "dead" player. As in a yes/no answer. Not a full out claim of the role name haha

I think that perhaps the unofficial role name could be possible, but I see your point towards the asking about a "dead player" can make sense. but sadly I can't help you with the question.

(sorry I'm on mobile my posts are going. to be spotty my phone screen is a pos)
 
Just got my second vote :/ Maybe even being doctor won't help this haha
 
@Point one Yeah, I found it suspicious. Her tone was weird, and that was the best thing to go off of, at the time. What would you have perferred me do? Not bring up anything and let the thread die?

@Point 2 Where was I bluehunting (guessing thats what you mean by feeling out roles)? Your trail of logic is: I'm asking people questions about their stances > ??? > I'm PR hunting. Your logic doesn't follow. And literally the only lurker I called out was Curry. I even defended Cad and Curry later.

@Point 3 Well I had taken it seriously as a scum slip. If you thought someone did something that confirmed themselves as mafia, what would you do? Him and haw over it? No, you'd advocate for their lynch.

@Point 4 I was explaining his reasoning. So clarification/asking for him to contribute is suspicious?

@Point 5 No, I'm not asking for PRs to out themselves. I was thinking evidence from flavour might have been helpful.

@Point 6 You're right - I do want to know if he's actual Doc. Because if he's not, that's suspicious as hell. You don't want to know?

I mean you have called out a ton of people either for inactivity, tone of their posts, lurking, their suspicions. It just seems like you are trying to test so many people and be everywhere, its not sitting well with me, and why are you doing all this stuff? I'm not quite sure because I know nothing about any mafia tactics especially for day 1. Hence why I wanted to bring them to attention because I'm not quite sure about intentions and stuff like that because I'm new in general to mafia. But I do know how I feel about instincts and there were plenty of things to bring up, so I felt good in bringing this to attention.

I'm not saying lets all vote for you at all, but I want others to mull these things around at least a little bit. The only actual red flag was the calling out PRs to confirm the Reagan thing. and your answer @point5 doesn't really convince me that it couldn't be what you were doing.... thats an obvious answer you could've given
 
Just finished my exams, will try to catch up on all the pages I missed!
 
It just seems like you are trying to test so many people and be everywhere

That sounds like they're being a helpful townie that isn't sitting around doing nothing and is actively working towards finding and calling out Maf to me.
 
and yeah I can also see I am being a little nitpicky for saying my first few points....

but isnt it also nitpicking to call out alexi 10 minutes into the game for her insincere tone?
or curry for just lurking around for a little bit?

so I don't know what we are getting at about the importance of nitpicking, as long as you don't act on it right away
 
It really doesn't matter if I'm doctor if I'm lynched.

Why even say that? They had swapped the topic off of you and all you did was immediately bring the spotlight right back on you.

Headed to class and a video shoot, be back in a few hours.

- - - Post Merge - - -

I'll probably still be able to lurk, but not respond until I'm back to the apartment.
 
I was excited for this game. Then I realized how inept some of these people are
 
I don't really think Kat is a scum I see her trying to help the town by putting pressure on Aronthaer. That is how I read her so far.
 
Alright, @toadsworthy: I definitely understand what you're saying. Point 5 I'm ehh about I've been thinking over but yeah the rest is just usual SarasaKat to me - reaction testing, etc.



This, though.
It really doesn't matter if I'm doctor if I'm lynched.

Why even say that? They had swapped the topic off of you and all you did was immediately bring the spotlight right back on you.

Headed to class and a video shoot, be back in a few hours.

- - - Post Merge - - -

I'll probably still be able to lurk, but not respond until I'm back to the apartment.
^Exactly what Curry said. Like... Why say that. You get most of the sus of off you, then bring it right back. Wth?
 
Back
Top