@Point one Yeah, I found it suspicious. Her tone was weird, and that was the best thing to go off of, at the time. What would you have perferred me do? Not bring up anything and let the thread die?
@Point 2 Where was I bluehunting (guessing thats what you mean by feeling out roles)? Your trail of logic is: I'm asking people questions about their stances > ??? > I'm PR hunting. Your logic doesn't follow. And literally the only lurker I called out was Curry. I even defended Cad and Curry later.
@Point 3 Well I had taken it seriously as a scum slip. If you thought someone did something that confirmed themselves as mafia, what would you do? Him and haw over it? No, you'd advocate for their lynch.
@Point 4 I was explaining his reasoning. So clarification/asking for him to contribute is suspicious?
@Point 5 No, I'm not asking for PRs to out themselves. I was thinking evidence from flavour might have been helpful.
@Point 6 You're right - I do want to know if he's actual Doc. Because if he's not, that's suspicious as hell. You don't want to know?