Aquilla
slow replies, reach me on discord if you need me ❄
I’m completely on board with private voting, takes a lot of the anxiety away from it as others have said.
I also agree that I think the involved people should be disqualified. That being said, I also understand staff trying to keep the identities private to protect the responsible people from bashing, removing them from the competition now would out whoever did it. Maybe a participation cooldown/ exclusion for the next event could be a solution, similar to how cheaters have been excluded from egg hunts in the past (if their cover was blown).
Having more than one vote might also help. People can’t be prevented from simply taking their campaigns (can’t believe there are campaigns for an art contest over pixels on an AC forum lmao) to other private messengers, but having more votes might at least take some pressure off. If someone’s one vote is a tiebreaker, it can be uncomfortable deciding who to give it to. Having the voting private is already a great step to eliminating this bias.
I also agree that I think the involved people should be disqualified. That being said, I also understand staff trying to keep the identities private to protect the responsible people from bashing, removing them from the competition now would out whoever did it. Maybe a participation cooldown/ exclusion for the next event could be a solution, similar to how cheaters have been excluded from egg hunts in the past (if their cover was blown).
Having more than one vote might also help. People can’t be prevented from simply taking their campaigns (can’t believe there are campaigns for an art contest over pixels on an AC forum lmao) to other private messengers, but having more votes might at least take some pressure off. If someone’s one vote is a tiebreaker, it can be uncomfortable deciding who to give it to. Having the voting private is already a great step to eliminating this bias.