Oh, THIS topic...
I'm not in the mood right now to write an essay either... Let's see if I can keep it short.
I think that (for example) the bible is a fascinating book as it has survived as one of the central works of humanity across a long period of time. I think that it's obvious that it was written by (many) "normal people" as a collection of stories that try to teach others how to conduct properly in the world so people can make the best of it. It puts realizations about life into archetypical stories that teach life lessons. As such I don't believe that it has any connection to whatever "otherly divine being" [as god is commonly understood] there might be, much less a planning creator figure.
I think that people are doing a disservice to the bible by ignoring it just because they don't have "faith" in a god or something like that. I think that the bible requires
much more nuanced reading than just the surface level of "there is a God and they say this and that". If you actually try to put yourself in the position of the bible protagonists, you should discover that it's more about the battle of "good and evil" inside the human than about a heavenly god or hellish devil. So when "God says this and that" it's actually more like the conscious of the person is saying this and that.
I think that the religious touch is there so that people who hear these stories incoperate the lessons in their lives and stop questioning them too much. The intention might have been good, but I think that it has led to questionable outcomes in many ways (exploitation of people who learn to not question things enough, you know). Ya'll know about rituals, how they shape life? Like how brushing your teeth every morning is a ritual to keep your mouth healthy, not just clean? The same way, there can be (religious) rituals that do one thing to achieve a more hidden outcome.
So I don't think that there is an inherent link between Christianity and a divine creator figure ("God").
I acknowledge that the world in all its complexity seems quite magical though, so I don't deny the possibility of there being dimensions to the world that we have no idea about. Like what's up with the many reports of near-death experiences, where people basically die for a while, and they often claim to have floated out of their bodies and observed what's happening to their dying body - but then they are "resurrected". Or what's up with the weird and matching reports from people who take certain drugs? Or what's up with this whole concept of atoms and them making up everything, including living beings. And how often do you stop to think about how seriously weird and complex humans are?
Just as silly as it seems to me to think that "The Bible" is "the word of God" (or even just taking the concept of God presented there 100% at face value), just as silly it seems to me to claim to be 100% an atheist. This would mean
denying the possibility of there being anything "out of this world" that we can't conceptualize with science, such as reducing the thoughts of humans to neurochemical activity only. Please
actually stop here to think for a minute or two about the concept of thoughts and memory (of humans) and think about if you are ready to reduce that to ("scientifically measurable") neurochemical activity.
Meanwhile I think that we just don't know enough and the world is too weird and complex so people shouldn't have strong opinions about the existence of god(s) (as creators/allmighty beings). For all we know, we might be in some kind of
weird simulation - and I'm not saying that we are, we just really can't know for sure if we aren't.
I could expand on why I stressed the concept of "god as a creator", the short version is that I believe that a case of "the regular human conscious as something like god" (as always watching and judging you) could be put forward, but I'll stop for now.