Dang, I just came back, I got beaten to saying “omnisexual” lol. I might fall under that too, but I can’t say I have enough experience with enbies to know. As it is, I extremely rarely experience attraction to cis people, so I’d be overthinking and very, very heavily theorising. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Theoretically speaking- I don’t see why I would be unattracted to someone for being enby. I’m not cisgender myself. As for preferred gender? It shifts a lot with the day. But there’s a consistent bias to masc. I don’t even have experience dating girls… There’s probably a term for fluid attraction but this kinda just seems like normal bisexual confusion/shifts, I think it’s really common for that orientation. My real preference is like- prettyboys, I guess? Like men who just put in some effort to look good… also, suits and ties, suits and ties are extremely attractive. Yet when someone is just masc, that feels “plain” and more boring to me? I don’t want to sound judgemental, but eh. I know I’m more drawn to men, but not men who are outright rough/stoic and I find a lot of “attractive men” unattractive to me personally, it’s just that the kind of man I want is like finding a needle in a haystack…
To be fair, the omnisexual flag also goes really hard and I’ve never been completely satisfied with the shades on the bigender flag lol (pink, purple, blue is totally the right choice and even fits my aesthetic, but there’s something about the particular shades they used… especially the purple). That’s just more funny for me than anything though. I say I’m bisexual because it’s easiest and I’m happy leaving it at that, any other tags feel like fun theory for me. Not saying they’re invalid or anything, I just don’t need them for myself. I think I fit omnisexual, but I say bisexual because some people use bisexual as an umbrella term anyway, and more people know what it means.
I don’t feel like I need a term for this persay- but is there one for, well, needing a certain context, enough effort, etc. to experience attraction to someone?
As time goes on, I’ve always thought this, but I’m definitely demiromantic+demisexual. 100% at this point. I‘m only really physically attracted to someone with romantic attraction, and I’m only romantically attracted if I know someone and we have some history and context and special moments you know?
But even then it feels like I still need that to be kept up. I need buildup and anticipation to really feel attraction. I need to really feel a connection, some way or another. Libido isn’t the same as attraction, when I’m desperate I might get libido but it doesn’t change how finicky my attraction is. As long as I don’t go blaming partners or anything, it’s just a problem for me lol.
I also might be sapioromantic/sapiosexual, but it’s more about someone being able to articulate themselves than intellect, smarts, etc. I don’t think I feel attracted because I’m impressed at what someone knows, but instead, if they’re good at describing, solving, philosophy, introspection, etc.
It’s really sad but- my partner can’t articulate themselves well at all, I’m really trying to be patient and help them, but that... just makes it feel like a friendship instead of a relationship. If I can’t express myself intellectually with some real conversation and hear from them, it isn’t working for me. I don’t need them to find solutions for everything but… whenever we try to voice chat my partner ends up stammering and confused and more upset and stuff, it’s like trying to have those conversations makes it worse. I can’t help but feel at this point that if I don’t amicably end the relationship it’s going to end up with me bottled up and bitter. It isn’t fair for either of us. I am on a different page from my partner, it isn’t even like I move on by the time they catch up, they just don’t seem to catch up to where I was. Oversharing woo.
All of this sounds fairly theoretical. Woop