St. Patrick's Bell Boom Week starts now!

Status
Not open for further replies.
And while suggesting we need to make something more clear or other feedback and criticism is always welcome, comments like 'just remove the lotto feature entirely...' as if it's not possible to make improvements or correct mistakes in the future can come off as a bit over the top.

Yeah, sorry. That bit was just frustration talking because I wasted a ticket. s:
 
Congratulations to the latest winners! Good luck to everyone in the last draw!

It was very nice to give those who haven't won extra chances. I hope there's a ton of winners this time! Thank you also for the TBT giveaway!
 
110 Bells... one last price change tonight. I'M GOING FOR IT, BRING ON THE 300+ BELLS!
 
Ya know what? I'm gonna put my clovers in my lineup for some clover luck. Cause the only thing I've got to loose at this point was a bunch of tbt I could have saved for collectables that I 'definitely' would have got ;_;
 
oh heck i think i got 3 too many, can someone just remove those *slaps head* ofc i cant read lol.. did not mean to do it, or if u dont see this feel free to exclude me i'll try to buy others.
 
Last edited:
I wish everyone the best of luck (especially the ones who have been trying the entire event) and I hope a lot of people win tonight! :D The Kaleidoclover is my favorite collectible and I hope many are able to have one grace their lineup! :)
 
110 Bells... one last price change tonight. I'M GOING FOR IT, BRING ON THE 300+ BELLS!

honestly, go big or go home

99 bells is nothing that can't be easily made up. even if the last price does end up being trash, just w/e



also, random thought, but just imagine the sheer irony if this last draw ends up having the fewest number of winners
 
the only day i missed to check the turnpis was the 200+ one...
well here we go i guess. hit me with that 1 bell buyback price i dare you
 
also, random thought, but just imagine the sheer irony if this last draw ends up having the fewest number of winners

I am honestly concerned of that possibility as well my friend knowing what happened when the number of winners increased in past drawings. :/ Realistically though, I think the increased 6 ticket limit for certain people will prevent that trend from re-occurring since those people have a 6/28 chance of winning which is very impressive if you ask me!
 
Last edited:
I am honestly concerned of that possibility as well my friend knowing what happened when the number of winners increased in past drawings. :/ Realistically though, I think the increased 6 ticket limit for certain people will prevent that trend from re-occurring since those people have a 6/28 chance of winning which is very impressive if you ask me!

maybe if there are a minimal number of winners, staff will bend the rules a slight bit more and just roll two extra numbers on their own

I mean it wouldn't hurt anything at least, given this drawing can only net people 1 kaleidoclover. so even if someone does win twice, it's no huge issue
 
Good luck to everyone tonight! Also, thanks staff for the second 30 bells giveaway earlier (forgot to mention this in one of my last posts)! :)
 
maybe if there are a minimal number of winners, staff will bend the rules a slight bit more and just roll two extra numbers on their own

I mean it wouldn't hurt anything at least, given this drawing can only net people 1 kaleidoclover. so even if someone does win twice, it's no huge issue

That would be very nice if they did that especially if it made more people happy with the outcome, but I think they should only do that if the outcome is around the same of a normal drawing where there was a 3 ticket restriction (4-~11 winners)! :)
 
That would be very nice if they did that especially if it made more people happy with the outcome, but I think they should only do that if the outcome is around the same of a normal drawing where there was a 3 ticket restriction (4-~11 winners)! :)

oh yeah, I'm talking like really low 5 winners max (with that being pushing it really hard)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top