@Dolby: fair. I don't think we're getting anywhere with this spat.
I resussed you when you got defensive about people pushing on you. If it isn't clear, my read on you is weak. (Even weaker now)
Where was Amazon opportunistic? He voted Heyden, quoting my non-scumread reasoning as to why. When my reasoning was explained to be non-scumread, he crafted an even worse reason for the vote. (Note: Heyden was the only voted player at the time)
a) he's being extremely contradictory so ofc I'm gonna pick him out for it, sussing people for thing's he's doing, it's small but it's evident. while he's someone who's usually anti-town regardless of alignment, his reasons are extremely weak and sketchy.ok rn i feel like theres a quite a bit starting to go on and i'll have to go back and read up to refresh myself on everything thats been said so far. also iirc a few people have yet to speak or they need to speak more so ill be waiting on them too.
i saw jacob's reasoning which makes sense. he responded to the heat quite well and although i disagree with him bringing up the zendal lynch i can see why he did it after he explained. but f11 seems a tad too defensive to my post, all i said was seems eager which i believe is a fair assumption given the context in which i was looking at. also heyden seems to be pushing kirby awfully hard on something really small, there was also a lot of sus on him earlier which to this point i'm still confused about so i'll go back and read when i get time...i did not get to read why amazon voted heyden so i will do so. i'm not sure what to think of endless vs. dolby, both of them had really bad cases against each other and i would expect more from both of them. i'm beginning to wonder if the entire thing was staged (but then why would endless mention dolby likes staging fake interactions?) but i really can't imagine why two top players would have d1 beef like that, and so poorly too. it just seems a little sudden and out of place.
tldr; i need to read more (which i will hopefully later tonight) because currently my reads suck but those are my current thoughts
I just feel like you been lurking a lot and avoiding the thread. Guess I didn't see your post about your SAT score. But my point on Bowie's quick reads still stands.
You might not have seen this because it merged, but I asked you for scumleans
It is a weak town lean. I have bad reads on day 1.
@KermitTea I guess the moral of the story is to post when you have time to post and actually check things.
@Dolby I guess I can see from your point of view on that one. What's your opinion on Amazonevan?
beep boop bop i am town
Endless' post did clear up some things. Turns out he wasn't really sussing you anyway, only stating if you were mafia, it'd make sense how you acted. I still sus you somewhat, and I'm not changing my vote again until I feel I have the right suspect. I don't like vote changing a lot and we still have time. But you, Dolby, and Jacob are for sure on my watch list. Makes sense?
miley what's goodWith that being said, I'm going to read over what I missed here quickly and make any addendums as needed. I still have a bad feeling about Heyden (yeah, "because I do," not good reasoning, but I'm going to switch my vote anyway like I said I would a few hours ago). RN I'm not sure who it'll go to, and I don't want to just vote Dolby because that's what we seem to be moving towards, but if we have good reasoning against him I just might.
Why am I so high on this and what happened to Jacob being on your list?All right, I get why Abe now doesn't like me. I can't and won't hide behind noobishness for my actions as I think that's a pretty lame thing to do. What I'll say is that Heyden seemed like a suspect to me because of Abe's initial analysis, then when Abe clarified I had to give a different reason to keep my vote, and it was pretty bad. Hence why I've stated multiple times I'm switching from Heyden. But between Dolby and Kirby (who seems helpful to town but I agree with Heyden that he seems quick to 180 for little reason) I'm not sure who to vote for. IK that no lynching is a terrible idea and that someone should go to collect info, but who?
Why am I so high on this and what happened to Jacob being on your list?
you stated it once like 10 mins ago and even then u lied?? wtf are you on aboutAll right, I get why Abe now doesn't like me. I can't and won't hide behind noobishness for my actions as I think that's a pretty lame thing to do. What I'll say is that Heyden seemed like a suspect to me because of Abe's initial analysis, then when Abe clarified I had to give a different reason to keep my vote, and it was pretty bad. Hence why I've stated multiple times I'm switching from Heyden. But between Dolby and Kirby (who seems helpful to town but I agree with Heyden that he seems quick to 180 for little reason) I'm not sure who to vote for. IK that no lynching is a terrible idea and that someone should go to collect info, but who?
I put you there because town seems to be voting between Heyden, you, and Kirby. Jacob has inexplicably seemingly been cleared for his rather boorish behavior earlier, but I still might vote for him. Idk.
inb4 sussed for indecisiveness when everyone has been incredibly indecisive
you stated it once like 10 mins ago and even then u lied?? wtf are you on about
- - - Post Merge - - -
whatever, i'll be back later on tonight
that's not how i read it, and what if you never found a better suspect? then you wouldn't be switching off me, you wouldn't have switched off of me, therefore you never stated you would change your vote, don't twist mine :3You're deliberately twisting my words. A few hours ago, I said I wouldn't switch until we get a better suspect. Now, a few minutes ago, I'd said I'd change, consistent with what I said prior. I'm sorry I didn't exactly say "OK GUYS I'MMA SWITCH FROM HEYDEN." But I don't appreciate your misleading everyone about my intentions. Perhaps I could have phrased it better, but everyone's paranoia is kind of nervewracking tbh.
If this is about probable lynches, Heyden has two votes, both of which said they'd move, and I have one. If this was an hour before EOD I'd understand and support this sentiment, but at this point, pretty much any lynch could happen, and it's best to go after the people who you sus the most rather than worry about them not being viable lynch candidates
that's not how i read it, and what if you never found a better suspect? then you wouldn't be switching off me, you wouldn't have switched off of me, therefore you never stated you would change your vote, don't twist mine :3
also why vote in the first place????? don't play the victim when you throw votes around with 0 reasoning
- - - Post Merge - - -
let me rephrase that, if you never found a better suspect than me, you would've kept your vote on me, correct? therefore you never stated you were going to switch off of me, it was just that you might, depending on ~what changes~
well it's hard to know your intentions when you say something different to 'what you meant', also again, any reason for your potential jacob vote besides kat and karen already bringing up that policy lynching was 'scummy' or are you just sheeping on that tooAnd I was pretty damn sure we'd find someone better by then. Again, I probably should have said it better, but I definitely intended to switch from you when I originally posted hours ago, and nothing has changed since then. You're painting me as someone who lied earlier, which I don't take very kindly to.
BTW I'm switching now, so all of your anger is now out the window.