wild blue yonder
~~~~~~~~~
please tell me dead people posting is not a usual thing on this site
please tell me dead people posting is not a usual thing on this site
please tell me dead people posting is not a usual thing on this site
Curry
Entropy
Tardis
Wild
Shiida
Miharu
These people are all unconfirmed. I'm dropping Entropy from the list for her work finding Tom and Alexi. Shiida was attacked by an oppurtunistic Cadbberry on Day One, which I don't think that Cad would do in a scum v scum situation. Tardis shot Cadbberry. Wild was among the first to suspect Tom, and pushed for the deaths of Oath2order and Alexi
The two most likely scum to me are Miharu and Curry
I'm actually really mad instead of happy lol
"OMGUS stands for 'Oh My God, You Suck (for voting for me)!'. it is sometimes used as a shorthand to indicate that you are voting for someone primarily because they voted for you."
Yeah lol, because if I was busing my teammate I'd be sure to let everyone know before they get lynched the exact role they are, because that makes sense. You've been trying to find a reason to call me scum this entire game and at this point you're basically just grabbing onto anything you possibly can. Ever since Day 1 you've been inconsistent but trying to call me scum saying that I'm following my meta but that I'm scum, then the next day saying I'm not following my meta and I'm scum, and now you're back to saying I'm showing effort. You also claimed entirely wrong information about me in your will even if Day 2 deaths weren't up, the point was still invalid because I commented on the Day 1 deaths. Now you're thinking I would share the role of one of my teammates before they get lynched? If you really think I'm scum, make a case against me that isn't shouting "you're not following meta!" because that's the best argument you've had against me this entire game.
I find it hilarious that you'll sit here and blame meta for me being scum but yet when I've already addressed you in two different posts with valid points you choose to ignore them. Yeah, I'm the scummy one for scum hunting and theorizing on what roles could be in play and who might have them. Let's not forget that I've been right both times people have flipped scum since that post. Oath's role I was wrong on, but he's part of scum like I thought. There's 12 people left in this game still. I voted for Tom, Cadbberry and was sus of oath. Do you REALLY think I'd be ballsy enough to bus THREE of my teammates and try and win a majority based game either alone or with one other partner, with no third party, when I'm on people's scum lists? What sense does that make at all?
Don't forget your other scum leans past Day 2 on Sataric:
You know who else Daniel scum read? You. So this can be directly pointed back to you as well. I'm starting to notice a pattern where everyone who you find scum in this game doesn't seem to follow their meta at some point this game, but then when someone brings up yours, you get defensive or flat out ignore it.
Hence one of your favorite your defenses is "if people would look into my meta they would see that I'm following it and I'm always scum read each game!" Meta isn't the entirety of mafia and this game matters more than what people did in the past. Look at Cad, Jacob, entropy, and probably more who all said they wanted to change meta. Meta can be helpful at times, but when it's your strongest reason for sus'ing someone and your best defense, it doesn't hold weight. Let's look at how many times you used meta alone as a defense for yourself:
Against Cad
Against Tardis
In fairness to this one, Tardis literally said "and alexi something is off about her meta." as his only explanation, which is also part of the problem (for him, not you).
Against shiida
So here you're saying you'll name people who are scummy for changing their play style but when someone calls you out for off meta you say, "oh well I can say other people who are doing it too!" and don't think it's scummy of you. Someone blames you for meta and so you try to pawn it off on other people because of another meta argument.
It's funny cause these defenses are Day 2 and later. Day 1, I can see maybe. Not much has happened in the thread and people are shouting "Meta! Meta! Meta!" but when you're using these as defenses passed Day 1 is when it starts to get scummy. One of the biggest reasons I don't participate early game is BECAUSE it's so much meta talk. I've been in one game prior to this and didn't know **** about meta then, and tbh meta talk just flat out bores me so I don't comment on it much now. Sometimes, but not always and I never use meta as my only defense unless someone just says "your meta is off Curry." with no other reasoning. If meta is determined off of one game and a micro and I have to play identical to that each time I play so I don't look like scum, then that's stupid af.
I also love how you say this when you are pushed to defend yourself
Clearly cases and defenses are useless banter to the game. It's funny because you're saying you don't see a need to defend yourself more when that was one of the reasons you criticized Daniel, one of the only people you made a valid case on, even if he did flip town.
So it's okay for you to not defend yourself, but yet when someone avoids defending themselves, it's scummy.
Again like I mentioned with tae, you're one of the people who call people out for filler posts, which is hypocritical when you post things like:
I'll be honest, you''re actually one of the least guilty of this, but if you're going to call me scum solely for filler and meta, take a look at your own posts. And before you say it, this point is a bit hypocritical to me too. I have a **** ton of filler this game, but like I said, up until I made my massive post I really just didn't give a **** about this game. Now I do, and now I'm seeing just how hypocritical people who blame filler posts as a scum read for someone are.
It's really convenient in your Day 2 will you townread (dark greened) tae but then Day 3 goes on and people start to sus tae and now all of a sudden he's a scum read for you? You admitted to flipping, but again one of your biggest reasons is that he has no scum meta. Notice in my case against tae I didn't once mention tae's meta. It shouldn't be a big point in why someone is scum read imo, especially when like me, you say he's following his aggressive meta flat out, but he has no scum meta so therefore he's scummy. Plus the Vig claim like other people have mentioned.
This whole game you've made cases on people who got mislynched, voted for a person who then flipped Doc on D3 when he showed up dead, blamed meta and poor reasoning or sometimes wrong reasoning in your wills for some of your sus reads. If you get lynched and flip green/blue I will **** a brick and happily accept any punishment given to me.
- - - Post Merge - - -
My will:
I think I was on the right track on my theory of who is playing us as the mafia. Remember to not town lock everyone and never look back because I definitely think someone is playing us and I don't want this to turn out like Xeno where it becomes too little too late when people start to recognize it. As such, here is my final color coded list:
Alexi/Chrystina
Cory
Entropy
Tardis2016/KirbyStarship
Dolby
Heyden
taesaek
Bingo/Trundle
Sataric
Oath2Order
Kevinnn
Wild Blue Yonder
Shiida
Miharu
Miharu was a town lean until her posts around Cad's death which made me rethink.
@Curry- I felt your fire in pushing Alexi today and you contributed to me feeling like she was the best lynch. What I need to look back at is how you came to focus on Alexi instead of tae today, because I can see it being strategic as scum if you two are the team today to try to distance to get one of you some more endgame credit because both of you were relatively scumread yesterday. If you have more thoughts than what you posted on how Aya2order's flip changed your feelings about there being one scum in Aya2order/Alexi, it'd help me read you.
Actually, Curry: can you clarify when this will was written relative to the pre-automerge stuff