Damniel
Openly Wolfing
WeAyyye! Super stoked weknocked out scum D1. let's hope whoever has the bomb throws it at scum tonight o;
##VOTE: Call me Daniel
?Que we?
WeAyyye! Super stoked weknocked out scum D1. let's hope whoever has the bomb throws it at scum tonight o;
##VOTE: Call me Daniel
?Que we?
TESTING
Ayaya was just saying (or at least, I think) how m3ow brought up good points, but she necessarily doesn't have to agree with them.Again, Ayaya contradicts herself:
Now the contradiction here isn't as obvious, but look at the tone of the how she says it. With her read of me, she says "she posts a lot to make it harder for town to find info" and followed it by "Thought unlike..." and gave things that I did that were pro-town, making the 1st item seem like her problem with me. However, in Panda's post, she says "I don't think someone who's trying to contribute should be seen as scum" and "she posts a lot that it's easier to find slips if she is scum", which is basically what was said about me in a positive light (whereas when she said the same thing to me, it was spun into a more negative light).Ayaya said:Afterwards is Panda. M3ow brought up good points but I personally don't think someone who's trying to contribute should be seen as scum simply because they posted a lot of filler (I made that assumption on Kat on the last game, after all) if anything, she posts a lot that it's easier to find slips if she is scum. Null on her but I'll be reading through her replies throughout the game, and it would help if you post less so it's easier for me and others to read through x_x
Haha, thanks! Yeah I saw that once Ness flipped scum and was like, "Wow ok lol"@SarasaKat- I actually just read through it all. Jeez these reads are like incredibly long. x__x I guess I'll need to start taking more time on reading people & to write mine out ha.
Anyways, I do agree with most of your points, and you actually pointed out a lot of things I had missed. Like how she pretty much defended Ness after stating was null on him. Some contradictions you pointed out weren't really contradictions though. For example
Ayaya was just saying (or at least, I think) how m3ow brought up good points, but she necessarily doesn't have to agree with them.
Of course that's just one tiny bit in your entire post that I don't agree with, so not like it matters much. Anyways, nice finds.
Because I don't want to get modkilled from not voting. I received quite a few warnings on the last game, so that's why. It's just a placeholder LOL if you want me to change it I will.
Finally had a chance to come on and see what's happened.... and LOL Ness trying to scare off new players D1 plus defending Rune's joke on inactivity... two strikes. Three strikes and I'll switch my shtlynch vote over to you because you're coming off scummy to me this is D1 mind you, I have nothing else to go off of, and choosing not to lynch is going to hurt us more than help
...
^ I already answered that.
I pushed almost being modkilled in the last game I played, which is why I'm voting everyday. Like I said, it's a placeholder. If you want me to change it just tell me
Not explaining reasoning? Jfc are you blind
Just got a chance to come on this morning. I've only had time to skim, so it'll be until later before I make any reads
I've asked before, and I'll ask again. Are you blind?
I haven't changed my vote to Ness yet, and I don't think I will after seeing Daniel flip-flop like a fish.
Um... I live in a different timezone than most of you, and I don't get on until later in the day.
If that's the true reason you're voting me, I see this as a cheap excuse for scum to jump on a bandwagon.
As far as the accusations against me, know this: my death will do nothing but show everyone's true colors. Most of the reasons I see people voting me, as previously stated, are of weak logic; and I like it was said, I can see this as a way for scum to easily knock out a shtty townie via bandwagon to get closer to their win con. LOL I honestly wouldn't be surprised if 90% of the people pushing my lynch end up bleeding red or yellow later on in the game.
As far as why I haven't changed my vote on Daniel yet, it's because after seeing how he's reacting, I think it'd be better if it just stayed there. Besides, I'm on the chopping block, so why does it even matter?
Nosotros, como en el pueblo.
I left the vote on you because I still suspected you as scum at that time.
Uh
it didn't say that chub won't contribute to KP if he used an action in the role description
*shrugs shoulders*
This is scummy as hell, and you're misrepresenting me in that last post I made by 1000% percent than it actually is. There isn't anything in that post I made that is trying to "scare away" any of the newcomers, as literally the only person i've acknowledged thats new at this point is Alexi. It was obviously a very throw away post in the trash that i've made, since i've acted like this before in TBT mafia, acting in an unkindly and upset way. Also, in defense of Rune, if I see that someone has faulty logic being strung at someone in a way like this then yes i'm going to defend them because it shouldn't be something to call someone scum. Also, we clearly have some discussion going on already, like M3ow pointing out her points on Panda. Instead of choosing to "shtlynch" me, why not instead try to test other players, and figure out whos scum that way so we'd have a shot at lynching scum?
In this post here, i'm not trying to come off as defensive but just generally explain something to the new player. I think I just over did it too much to where I came off as rude and overly defensive. It was also trying to explain that if Rune was really serious and was trying to lurk the game out, which if you look at his current posts he hasn't, then that would just be putting a stake in his heart, guaranteeing a lynch on him later in the game and ruining possible KP for his scum team.
Going back to the first time I defended Rune...
This is the first time I defended rune, and literally all I did was say that it was obviously a joke on Rune's part, since he's done this before in basically every game i've played with him. Lucanosa just said that the fact that I said this was a joke was suspicious just a few posts later, when Jacob also clearly just said the exact same thing as me.
Also...
I really don't understand the train of thought at all, how is me defending an obvious jokes on bad logic with someone, suspicious? If its because I looked overly defensive (which, you can read any game ever on TBT that i've played in, i'm always defensive like this) If I really need to spell this out for you, then i'll do it.
Either way, i'm generally having a Null read on Lucanosa right now. 1 because he's acting like he always does, but 2 is that he's voting Daniel when he's suspicious of me, which he really shouldn't be doing a placeholder considering we have plenty to talk about right now, and that his train of thought is misrepresenting me.
Anyway, I need to go ISO the posts right now. And geez this is probably the lengthiest post i've made in TBT mafia yet on someone. I need to reply to Alexi and co.
Excuse me, you just said that you think that Runeraider and Lucanosa are the best lynches for today. You only just now happened to have mentioned it being Panda in this post here.
You also just did a direct word vomit of M3ow's entire ISO on Panda. This is hypocritical, since you yourself have barely made any posts that are actually contributing to anything. All of your posts this game is you posting one liners that all agree to something that has been said before, without actually saying anything useful.
Panda, how do you feel about this sudden attack on you?
I don't expect much, since obviously Day 1 doesn't give anyone much of a chance to be suspicious. It it was only a 3 hour difference when you said you 1st suspected Panda, but only 20 minutes before this post you clearly say that you want a Runeraider/Lucanosa lynch, or at the very least suggest them as great lynches for today.
I also just made my giant post on Lucanosa, which I expected you to comment on because you said you thought he would be a good lynch. I also saw you in the currently browsing bar when I posted it, so I know you saw it.
So in other words, I don't understand.
- - - Post Merge - - -
I'm also seeing Iggy Koopa down their for the first time this game.
Panda is playing a lot like a townie right now. In all honesty this is what happens every game and this is her obvious town behavior.
I can't get that ISO up since i'm doing History homework, right after i have my math. We still have several hours to decide on a lynch.
- - - Post Merge - - -
Also I agree with 2/5ths of this. Panda and Oath i'm feeling town, Kat is null, but I don't really agree with the Ayaya scum thoughts.
I can take a snapshot of my work for you if you're that disbelieving.
I've already showed some reasons as to why I think its Daniel, i'm too tired to do anything so good night.
Ok so i'm dead rn but if i don't post this now i'll never be able to post it. I think that Call me Daniel is mafia. Lets start off with meta, with 1 game as scum the other as town.
When CMD is town, he makes logically, well thought out posts that are generally just plain logical and not out of the ordinary. He actually helps town quiet a bit when he's town, like all of these quotes being town tells.
I'd like to take a minute to note that this entire scum ISO he made on Panda in this game is incredibly similar to our current situation.
Daniel usually goes after whomever he thinks is weakest in the thread, this game namely being Panda and Lucanosa He also makes really bad cases on people, and even looking at his Panda case this game, its literally exactly the same situation as we're in here with him and her.
With that done lets go to our in game behavior.
Like I said, he has some huge wash here. He says this 20 minutes before shifting right towards panda.
This looks incredibly familiar to this first part of the case he made on Panda in Game of thrones~
I'm gonna go onto the biggest reason I think that Call me Daniel is scum right now, this post.
Lucanosa has only been scum in 1 game, that was Forest Fire. This quote, this quote makes me think he is scum.
people would be suspicious and claimed it was as a "placeholder".
I highly doubt that Lucanosa would be quick enough to think of something like this to say, and this is looking like Daniel trying to go after Lucanosa since he's a weak target. Even looking at the post where he says "placeholder" seems to be genuine right now. let me go get it~
I see this as Lucanosa's genuine town behavior now. I think that Lucanosa is town, and that Daniel is scum in our situation. This is a bit of a blunted list because i'm tired as hell right now.
- - - Post Merge - - -
Also forgot to mention:
-Panda is obvious townie and Daniel is still voting her
-Daniel is also suspicious of Lucanosa yet he isn't voting him
-Daniel is mainly suspicious of Panda just because she has been "spamming".
If you're currently alive in this game, please consider the following ~
1. **** you.
2. Please let me live past day one
3. Why do all of you assume that I get mad and overly defensive when I only made 1 post like that. I was going to play calmer this game, I didn't do ****.
4. Please remember what I said on Daniel
5. Go back to one.
- - - Post Merge - - -
Also duck you all for lynching me because of a grammatical error.
Okay, as I said, I'm gonna look at the people who participated in the KP discussion as it's likely at least one scum is contributing there so they seem active while not really contributing.
As it can be seen above, the first person who brought up the topic is Daniel. I'm null on him because it's likely he's just saying that to get a discussion going. Also getting null from the rest of his posts.
The person who answered him first is Jacob, and out of all his posts, this stands out to me:
This post seem to indicate he's not reading the thread at all, claimed to read 12 pages back yet didn't see that the convo stopped after doughssant and I pointed out that KP discussion isn't helping much beside getting a discussion going.
And why do you think PL and no lynch is favorable when we're not even close to deadline and people have started discussing their suspicions at that time? You haven't even posted your reads or try to question people to justify that conclusion.
Next to join the discussion is SarasaKat. She mentioned she wanted to change her playstyle before the game started yet I'm seeing the same playstyle as in Papers Please here, which in that game made me think she's suspicious because she posts a lot to make it harder for town to find info. Though unlike Papers Please, half of the players are not posting as much so she did get a discussion going now. She also made newbies feel welcome and speak up which is good. Null for now but I hope you're town mom instead of scum mom this game lol.
Afterwards is Panda. M3ow brought up good points but I personally don't think someone who's trying to contribute should be seen as scum simply because they posted a lot of filler (I made that assumption on Kat on the last game, after all) if anything, she posts a lot that it's easier to find slips if she is scum. Null on her but I'll be reading through her replies throughout the game, and it would help if you post less so it's easier for me and others to read through x_x
And then we have Ness. His "lets try to do some math there" kind of piqued me at first since they furthered the KP discussion. I never played with him as mafia and I always read him as scummy at some point because of how emotional he gets (ex: Scummy Mafia where he got into a heated argument with Trojan) and the only reason I didn't go after him like others in Papers Please is because he RC'd to me. I'm gonna give him another read when someone has flipped but for now null.
I'm leaning on town for Runeraider and oath2order for now, so far nothing in their replies stands out to me and Oath is acting like in Forest Fire here (tho I never played with him as scum so not sure if there are playstyle changes)
Also leaning on town for doughssant since they pointed out what I was thinking. I think if they're scum they would've stayed quiet.
I woke up 2 hours ago and have only been looking at the people I listed above, so I haven't looked through everyone else as closely. Will read through the thread once again now.
Okay, finished reading through the thread. After seeing all the discussions going on between players, I noticed some things but not enough to really pinpoint their alignment, and so far Jacob is the one I find the most suspicious still, so I'm placing my vote on him.
Other players whose names are brought up (Lucanosa, Daniel, Panda, Ness) I see more as townie so far. Lucanosa is quick to assumptions as usual, and someone pointed out that they'd probably lay low as scum which I agree. Panda, Ness, and Daniel has some posts/behavior that seem a bit odd to me but I think I'll leave that to D2 since it's not odd enough for me to agree that they seem scummy. I can also see the logic in Ness' read, but I noticed how it's a bit odd that he went back to being aggressive in this game, when he said in previous games that he's trying to be less so.
Don't have reads for any other players so far that's worth pointing out.
That's because you're as experienced as Daniel and Ness here yet you're not contributing as enough as them (you've played more games than I did, even!)
Please post more and post seriously </3
I haven't really read much from this game so far, but this post kinda seems weird to me. I'm pretty sure Kat was reaction testing for the vote.
I bolded what stuck out to me. It kinda reads scummy to me, although I'm not exactly sure. I feel like there is an underlying tone of a mafia trying to keep composed even though attention has been brought to them so early in the game for literally no reason.
I also think her answer to #2 was a bit indicative. If I read it assuming she is town, it heavily implies that she isn't a townie. She would have worded it differently, I believe, if she were a townie. That hints at blue or scum. Overall, I am going to place my vote on Beardo for the time being, just to show indication that I believe this person may be scum.
Now that I'm caught up, I actually agree with Ness' arguments. I also have something to add about behaviour.
- When Call Me Daniel plays as town, he plays a lot less serious. You often see jokes, memes, or just more lighthearted wording of posts.
- When Call Me Daniel plays as scum, he plays more serious. He is down to the point (even if his point isn't very good), direct, and actively searching for "scum".
There have been a few games with small exceptions to this. The only issue with the whole scenario is that I am currently reading his posts as town regardless of how he is playing.
I have my suspicions for both Daniel and Lucanosa, but since I don't really favor one over the other in terms of lynches, and I see a greater chance of Daniel being lynched than Lucanosa, I put my vote on Daniel. See you guys in the morning.
Being stuck in a room can give you a lot of patienceDamn, thought I was almost finished but there's still a whole other half. This is gonna take years to quote.
Props to Kat for actually having the patience to write it out.
This seemed like she was trying to cut off conversation to the point of calling people who were in it scummy.
She never responded. She even quoted my question in her analysis of this discussion (her 3rd post), but she never answered. So I know she saw it. But here we are, without an answer. And without one, the only thing I can assume she was doing was trying to cut off discussion out of intimidation.
I think this was a little psychological manipulation on her part.
First off, you pretty blatantly omitted some relevant posts.
Now onto the reads you made:
So getting a discussion going is scummy if it's done by Jacob, and null if it's done by Daniel? That seems a bit shady.
Written by Ayaya: This post seem to indicate he's not reading the thread at all, claimed to read 12 pages back yet didn't see that the convo stopped after doughssant and I pointed out that KP discussion isn't helping much beside getting a discussion going.
As it can be seen above, the first person who brought up the topic is Daniel. I'm null on him because it's likely he's just saying that to get a discussion going.
Again, Ayaya contradicts herself:
Now the contradiction here isn't as obvious, but look at the tone of the how she says it. With her read of me, she says "she posts a lot to make it harder for town to find info" and followed it by "Thought unlike..." and gave things that I did that were pro-town, making the 1st item seem like her problem with me. However, in Panda's post, she says "I don't think someone who's trying to contribute should be seen as scum" and "she posts a lot that it's easier to find slips if she is scum", which is basically what was said about me in a positive light (whereas when she said the same thing to me, it was spun into a more negative light).
Huh, and you don't find it fit to give Rune a reason besides nothing stood out to you about him? That seems like a very null indicator - a town read off of that seems kind of odd.
And I kind of pointed this out already, but dough did join in on the conversation you considered suspicious so.
I'm relatively OK with the post content itself, but I find it interesting she's defending Ness (the bolded) after she just got done saying she null read him. And it wasn't a perfectly neutral null either.
She points out something suspicious Ness did but then goes on to say "I always read him as scummy at some point." so if she can't find anything good that Ness did, that implies a slight scum lean. Yet she posted here defending him.
-snip-
Again, she's defending a mafian as a townie but that isn't the main point here. She is extremely vague here. "I noticed some things"? " 'x' has some posts/behavior that seem a bit odd to me"?
No your first impressions. You said Ness was scummy the whole game, though you only mentioned Trojan/me in your first post.
Just about to explain this as well as yell at literally everyone because they missed this. It's SO OBVIOUS THAT IT'S DANIEL THAT IT HURTS AND I WILL SHOW WHY.??????????????????
I think Rune is trying a lot harder this game to appear active and like he's trying to help town because I had his scum behaviour pegged from last game. The trouble is that this still follows the scum meta of **** voting just to not get modkilled. There's no good or valid reasoning behind his votes as he's just bandwagoning with everyone else.
Okay this is going to be a wordy post because I'm getting all my thoughts out in one go. Just try and read it please. First up:
Lucanosa
I've said why this pisses me off earlier. You don't just go "if you want me to change my vote, I will teehee!" That's not something that a town aligned player would say. It's called using your brain and thinking logically to then make a decision on who to vote for based on behaviour. Not LOL PLACEHOLDER!!11!
I feel like this is Lucanosa's attempt to lightly bus Ness. They slightly referenced each other, but it was more like "I'd like to lynch -my scum buddy- and x player, but I think x player is MORE sus". Ness said he "null read" Lucanosa, then "town read" him to push hard for Daniel's lynch.
THERE WERE PEOPLE POSTING READS AT THIS POINT IN THE GAME AND HE STILL JUST HAS A ****ING PLACEHOLDER.
Meow actually made a super solid case on Ness, yet Lucanosa still sits on Daniel with his scumbuddy. Honestly I think that is the absolute worst reasoning ever to vote for someone. If you're voting to just not get modkilled, then give up your spot to someone that will vote because they're actually playing. I will be surprised if Lucanosa is town aligned in this game. All he does is threaten town if he's lynched "you'll really regret lynching me" instead of providing anything of substance. My gut is screaming at these posts.
The Ness Reads
THIS SOFTCLAIM THO OFC HE WOULD KNOW
I'm going to put the posts themselves in a spoiler so that page doesn't drag on as there's a lot of text. This is only here for reference of what Ness has said in the game. I'll post my own tl;dr at the end instead of responding to every post:
Safe to assume that Daniel MIGHT not be mafia, but doesn't rule him out as a third party member.
TL;DR
-Defended Rune
-Null read Lucanosa and Sarasakat, THEN town read Lucanosa in order to push for Daniel
-Pushed hard for Daniel
-Said Panda is "obvious town"
-Town read Panda and Oath
-Specifically stated that Ayaya "wasn't scum"
Ayaya
Sarasa essentially summed up most of what I was thinking reading through Ayaya's posts. If you haven't read her post on Ayaya, go do it now.
Ayaya is usually pretty solid in posting reads, but I feel like all of these were very non-accusatory because it was all town and null reads with the exception of Jacob who is a fairly weak player. I feel like her posts so far come off as a lot of overview of what players have said to try and look like they're contributing a lot of text.
TL;DR
-Town read Runeraider, Oath, Doughssant, Panda, Ness and Daniel
-Scum read Jacob and voted for him
-Go read Sarasa's post
Other tidbits that stuck out to me as I reread the thread, feel free to comment on them:
Voting for Beardo based on the 3 questions? Is it just me or does this seem rushed and like Trundle's usual **** scum logic.
Here we have Trundle agreeing with Ness on Daniel, but then just town reading him at the end? Ness tried to get Daniel lynched for the who game, so how can you agree with Ness but then town read Daniel?
??????????????????
I think Rune is trying a lot harder this game to appear active and like he's trying to help town because I had his scum behaviour pegged from last game. The trouble is that this still follows the scum meta of **** voting just to not get modkilled. There's no good or valid reasoning behind his votes as he's just bandwagoning with everyone else.
Huh, I really dug myself in a deep hole. </3
It's okay though, If I don't die today, I'll continue wasting towns time on pressuring me. Might as well spare you guys the headache.
rune why can't you automatically quote instead of manually doing it, its hard to determine who said what...
Well, I agree with most of Minties case, not so much on the Ayaya part, but then again, its hard to determine who's who with 2 scum teams on the loose
@Rune why do all the quotes you pulled for that post not have the "originally posted by" at the top it makes it really hard to follow and i also don't like that you are tampering with the quotes, might be taking things out of context and what not.