Mafia TBT Newbie Mini Mafia II: On The Run (Game Over/Town Win)

[Murray]

That makes things go quicker than regular mafia. In the current game of 30 there's only 3 maf (now 2) plus cult.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Still leaving this question up: Murray, why did you just automatically vote Pom?

Yes
Murray was posting a lot that time

Was Murray online then?

sorry that the quotes are not in order but you get the idea~ this was at like 6am for me so no i wasn't online lol. So anyone saying im purposefully not replying is lying and pulling at strings. (Don't expect someone to be viewing this thread 18 hours a day; this is just unreasonable).

I voted Pom in order to create a d1 dynamic; organising players into groups, letting us see how players generate their opinions. If lynching me gives you leads on other people on future days then I am happy to go. The interesting thing is that I gave no reasoning to why I voted Pom, so people try to generate reasons out of thin air.

Considering previously how noone was posting/having opinions, now we can actually cast judgement. I see as what I did as very contributory to the town, even if you don't lynch Pom or even if you lynch me.

 

[Kammeh]

I'm not trying to defend Murray or anything, but why would Mafia do something like this on Day 1?

This is a good point. Murray just posted above their reasoning for their vote, too.
I think Murray is still slightly suspicious and that we should keep an eye on him, but I don't think we should lynch him just because he didn't explain his vote right away.

 

[Geoni]

I'm honestly not going to point my fingers of suspicion at you yet, Murry, since I think part of this suspicion is based on you being the first person to vote. And I don't agree with the vote.

I'm probably going to say we should lynch an inactive. It's day one, and lynching 'potential scum' has a high likelihood of lynching an active townie. I'd rather accidentally lynch a townie who is inactive than lynch an active one. In future days, it might become a little more clear who the potential scum really is.

 

[Aerious]

This is a good point. Murray just posted above their reasoning for their vote, too.
I think Murray is still slightly suspicious and that we should keep an eye on him, but I don't think we should lynch him just because he didn't explain his vote right away.

I still do think that Murray is suspicious and I'm hoping that the det investigates Murray tonight.

 

[Lio Fotia]

I'm honestly not going to point my fingers of suspicion at you yet, Murry, since I think part of this suspicion is based on you being the first person to vote. And I don't agree with the vote.

I'm probably going to say we should lynch an inactive. It's day one, and lynching 'potential scum' has a high likelihood of lynching an active townie. I'd rather accidentally lynch a townie who is inactive than lynch an active one. In future days, it might become a little more clear who the potential scum really is.

I fully agree with this logic. For now we want an active game and if we ignore the inactive players and lynch willy nilly, then mafia could get a foot up. So for right now we should play it safe and lynch inactive people.​

 

[Aerious]

I'm honestly not going to point my fingers of suspicion at you yet, Murry, since I think part of this suspicion is based on you being the first person to vote. And I don't agree with the vote.

It's because he was easily pointing fingers at people without reasoning.

 

[Geoni]

Hm. Problem though: everyone on the list has at least checked in.

 

[Murray]

I still do think that Murray is suspicious and I'm hoping that the det investigates Murray tonight.

Please don't try and influence the detective, they need to try and make an objective decision of who to investigate

 

[Aerious]

Please don't try and influence the detective, they need to try and make an objective decision of who to investigate

Why? Because they'll find something out?

 

[in-a-pickle]

Hm. Problem though: everyone on the list has at least checked in.

yeah, I think that they're won't be many inactive players this game, seeming as everyone is new and wants to try and play.

 

[Geoni]

The detective can be a power role, whether or not he thinks or doesn't think he is. It's the job of the villagers to try and persuade him to investigate an agreed upon target.

 

[Murray]

The detective can be a power role, whether or not he thinks or doesn't think he is. It's the job of the villagers to try and persuade him to investigate an agreed upon target.

No, it's the job of the mafia to try and persuade him to investigate a desired target.

 

[Geoni]

If you're mafia lmao.

 

[Murray]

If you're mafia lmao.

I'm just telling you what the mafia will be trying to do. If you want to ignore this fact then your loss.

 

[Geoni]

It's what both sides are going to do. It seems as if you're trying to dance around being targeted by the detective if we agree that we want him to investigate you. If the mafia persuades the detective to investigate you and you turn out to be innocent then it's more information for the villager side and if you're not scum, it's beneficial to you.

tbh you're seeming pretty scummy at this point Murray

 

[Murray]

It's what both sides are going to do. It seems as if you're trying to dance around being targeted by the detective if we agree that we want him to investigate you. If the mafia persuades the detective to investigate you and you turn out to be innocent then it's more information for the villager side and if you're not scum, it's beneficial to you.

tbh you're seeming pretty scummy at this point Murray

detective can investigate whoever they want, investigate me for all I care. I'm just saying that you need to consider that when people 'agree' on who to investigate, that the original decision and the act of persuasion is likely done by a mafia. You're arguing that if the detective gets an innocent report, then that's alright too (which it is, although not as helpful as a guilty report). In this case, if you don't care whether we get an innocent or guilty report, then it shouldn't matter who is investigated.

 

[Aerious]

I'm just telling you what the mafia will be trying to do. If you want to ignore this fact then your loss.

Most mafia actually act extremely similar to you. If someone blames them, they try to say the accuser is the one who's actually guilty because they're trapped in a corner. You probably made a mistake and then your coach is trying to convince you to cover it up but you're still sus.

 

[Geoni]

The detective can decide to go with or deviate from the agreed upon investigation target. And no, the villagers are going to be as fast to try and persuade as any mafia will be, because they're a powerless role but want to have an impact.

 

[Murray]

Most mafia actually act extremely similar to you. If someone blames them, they try to say the accuser is the one who's actually guilty because they're trapped in a corner. You probably made a mistake and then your coach is trying to convince you to cover it up but you're still sus.

who am I accusing as a rebound?

If you mean Moron I haven't said he is suspicious?

Once again trying to pull reasoning out of thin air.

 

[epona]

okay after reading through everything i am still suspicious of murray but i don't want to vote to lynch as an investigation would probably be more beneficial and wouldn't risk losing a townie
i'm for lynching an inactive, but nobody has been totally inactive and as in-a-pickle pointed out, seeing as a lot of players are new, inactivity mightn't be a big issue in this game