Evidence against a person presented and gathered in a way that makes it so I am not biased towards townreading anyone. For example, if someone, say, Oath, jumped on a bandwagon of voting someone, say, Tessa, without thinking, I would take note of that and consider that sus.
Lady Naga guide us
Trent the Paladin will wait patiently for his justice, but only for one day/night cycle. After that, he will enter the fray.
Regardless of alignment, Trent has put himself in a position where people expect him to vote for no one if king. I don’t think kinging him would give us any information at all
Most wolf reads early on are mostly throwing stuff at a wall and seeing what sticks. I think finding town and building trust is a much stronger tactic. Process of elimination is a strong tool
Is there more to your method here, would kinda insist on just joining myself and others in poking and prodding if so. You don't exactly need to vocalize town reads but it would be ideal to not sit back and watch. Folks are just going to hone in on that and it will probably derail day.
No, my strategy is to try and fly under the radar by staying neutral, no biases, sit on sidelines and gather evidence. Basically, my strategy is to be antisocial for a benefit of possibly not dying.
A bit anti-town, but I can't argue when I want to be king for 1) a bit 2) live past day one.
Is that necessarily inherently suspicious though? What if Oath jumped on Tessa as a play to get reactions? What if Oath was just genuinely really busy and felt the vote was important but didn't have enough time to say something before end of day?
Y'know, fair point, I completely forgot about variable KP. 3 maf sounds right in my head, and a maf king could totally lie about killing someone when they didn't. Or use their delayed kill for someone else to claim an attack + heal.
I'm not trying to be anti-town, I'm just trying to help from afar. That way, even if mafia tries to come after me, I could serve as a decoy of sorts while everyone else finds evidence so they can find the mafia.
yeah if we agree on no vote i think mafia would just vote someone that isnt posting much or someone slightly mafia looking. like mafia wouldnt try to do mind games at all and bc i think voting for king wouldnt give as much info as your usual chop vote
But why would they come after you when if anything your behavior helps them blend or lead? You are a decoy yes, but you serve the mafia in that regard.
if you wanna be a decoy, when I'm maf, I prioritize killing the chatty ones over the right ones
I think a king killing an inactive/low hanging fruit is better than killing no one. Leaving those types of players alive at the end is always risky since they tend to become the center of attention when there’s so much more that can be discussed. They can always be town and mafia will leave them alive for the purposes of using them to derail
agree that their current opinion isn't alignment indicative, but I do think its important to help them out. Especially if we are going to have more than 1 mafia game this year
No, it does not.
I could be gathering evidence to present against them. If I present it, I could pose a threat to their survival and possibly get them voted off. Then they would try to come after me to silence me and get rid of an evidence resource.
always down for policy chops ngl
